Emotional Intelligence and Job Effectiveness among Special School Teachers in Kerala: A Descriptive and Comparative Study
Authors
Assistant Professor, Sree Kerala Varma College, Thrissur, University of Calicut (India)
Associate Professor, Christ College (Autonomous), Irinjalakuda, University of Calicut (India)
Assistant Professor, Christ College (Autonomous), Irinjalakuda, University of Calicut (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12120133
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 12/12 | Page No: 1558-1563
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-07
Accepted: 2026-01-12
Published: 2026-01-16
Abstract
Teaching in special education settings necessitates advanced emotional competence owing to the intricate emotional and behavioral requirements of pupils. This study investigates the emotional intelligence and job efficacy of special school teachers in Kerala, while also analyzing variations across certain socio-demographic characteristics. Employing a descriptive and comparative research approach, data were gathered from 606 special school instructors via a structured questionnaire. Emotional intelligence was evaluated through personal and social competence aspects, while job effectiveness was analyzed utilizing indications such as job dedication. Statistical analyses encompassed percentage analysis, one-sample t-tests, independent t-tests, and one-way ANOVA. The findings demonstrate that special school educators possess markedly elevated emotional intelligence and robust job dedication. There were big disparities in emotional intelligence based on gender, age, experience, and wealth. However, marital status had no effect. The results show that special school teachers are emotionally strong and stress the need for programs that help them enhance their emotional intelligence so they can do their jobs better and be happier at work.
Keywords
Emotional Intelligence, Job Effectiveness, Special School Teachers, Socio-Demographic Factors, Kerala
Downloads
References
1. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197–215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Brackett, M. A., & Katulak, N. A. (2006). Emotional intelligence in the classroom. In J. Ciarrochi, J. Forgas, & J. Mayer (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in everyday life (pp. 1–27). New York: Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327–358. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE). (2014). Teacher education in India: Vision and mission. New Delhi: NCTE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Government of Kerala. (2020). Status of special education institutions in Kerala. Thiruvananthapuram. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study