Mergers and Acquisitions in India’s Steel Sector: Evaluating Corporate and Shareholder Growth through VRIO

This study examines whether domestic mergers and acquisitions (M&A) undertaken by listed Indian steel companies between 2010 and 2024 create shareholder and operational value, and how strategic resource complementarities influence outcomes. It integrates market reactions, post-merger performance, and VRIO-based synergies in a capital-intensive, cyclical industry. An event study with the NIFTY50 benchmark measures short-term market reactions. A matched difference-in-differences (DiD) framework evaluates three-year pre- and post-merger changes in return on assets, asset turnover, and sales growth. VRIO scoring, based on valuable, rare, inimitable, and well-organised resource attributes, assesses strategic fit. Robust standard errors and matched controls mitigate selection bias. Target firms earned +5.0% cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) over [−1, +1] days (p<0.01); acquirers posted 0.8–1.2% CAR (p<0.05). Post-merger, acquirers saw ROA rise by 1.1 percentage points (p=0.02), asset turnover by 0.18 (p=0.04), and sales growth by 3.5% (p=0.01). High-VRIO deals achieved an additional 0.55pp ROA improvement (p=0.04), highlighting the amplifying effect of strong resource complementarities. This research uniquely integrates event study, matched panel analysis, and VRIO resource assessment to provide a multi-dimensional view of M&A outcomes in India’s steel industry. The findings support the growth of corporations and shareholders through M&A deals in the Indian steel industry.

Keywords: M&A, VRIO, CAR, ROA, Turnover, Growth

1. Alexandridis, G., Mavrovitis, C. F., & Travlos, N. G. (2012). How have M&As changed? Evidence from the sixth merger wave. The European Journal of Finance, 18(8), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2011.628701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., & Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Beena, P. L. (2004). Towards understanding the merger wave in the Indian corporate sector—a comparative perspective. Working Paper 355, CDS Trivandrum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bhattacharyya, S., & Nain, A. (2011). Horizontal acquisitions and buying power: A product market analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chakrabarti, R., Gupta-Mukherjee, S., & Jayaraman, N. (2009). Mars–Venus marriages: Culture and cross-border M&A. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(2), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400414 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dutta, S., & Bose, S. (2015). Impact of mergers and acquisitions on firm performance: Evidence from India. Decision, 42(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-015-0093-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gaughan, P. A. (2017). Mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructurings (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Haleblian, J., Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M. A., & Davison, R. B. (2009). Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330554 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(83)90004-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. King, D. R., Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., & Covin, J. G. (2004). Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. King, D. R., Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., & Covin, J. G. (2004). Meta‐analyses of post‐acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. KPMG. (2022). Indian metals and mining industry: Trends and outlook. KPMG in India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kumar, R. (2012). Post-merger corporate performance: An Indian perspective. Management Research Review, 35(3-4), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211210113 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kumar, R., & Bansal, L. K. (2008). The impact of mergers and acquisitions on corporate performance in India. Management Decision, 46(10), 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810920029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lin, B. W. (2018). Knowledge resources and competitive advantage: The perspective of VRIO. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(8), 1732–1757. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2017-0148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mukherjee, P., & Sinha, M. (2019). Insolvency reforms and the consolidation of the Indian steel sector. Economic & Political Weekly, 54(48), 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Pandey, A., & Sahu, T. N. (2019). Mergers and acquisitions in India: Performance evaluation of acquiring companies. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(3), 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2017-0287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pawaskar, V. (2001). Effect of mergers on corporate performance in India. Vikalpa, 26(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920010103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. PwC. (2021). Mergers and acquisitions in India: Navigating the new normal. PricewaterhouseCoopers India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tuch, C., & O’Sullivan, N. (2007). The impact of acquisitions on firm performance: A review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(2), 141–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00210.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study