Teachers' Effectiveness in Using Innovative Teaching Methods in Classroom Teaching

Authors

T. Kirubalan

Faculty of Education, University of Colombo (Sri Lanka)

P. Sivananthan

Faculty of Education, University of Colombo (Sri Lanka)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13010188

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 13/1 | Page No: 2125-2132

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-28

Accepted: 2026-02-02

Published: 2026-02-14

Abstract

Teaching methods play a vital role in developing an intellectually capable and skilful student community within the education sector. Traditional teacher-centred instructional approaches alone are no longer sufficient to address the challenges of today’s fast-paced and information-rich world. Consequently, innovative teaching methods have become increasingly important for enhancing students’ learning experiences and fostering deep understanding. The results of schools located in difficult (underprivileged) areas within the Chankanai Education Division have had a significant impact on this situation. Based on this context, the present study was conducted with the objective of examining the challenges faced by teachers in using innovative teaching methods in classroom instruction in difficult-area schools of the Chankanai Education Division, and to explore how these challenges affect students’ achievement levels, with the ultimate aim of improving student achievement in these schools. As both quantitative and qualitative data were employed, this study adopts a mixed-methods research design. A descriptive survey method was used to conduct the study. The study population comprised 133 teachers from seven difficult-area schools with secondary sections in the Chankanai Education Division of the Valigamam Education Zone. Using a stratified simple random sampling technique based on gender and subject specialization, and applying Krejcie and Morgan’s table, a sample of 100 teachers and 7 principals was selected. Primary data were collected through questionnaires and interviews with principals and teachers. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis, while quantitative data were analysed descriptively using tables and charts. The findings of the study reveal that the use of innovative teaching methods in classroom instruction is limited. Schools lack adequate facilities to implement innovative teaching approaches, professional development opportunities for teachers are insufficient, support from school management is inadequate, students interest in learning is low, students demonstrate limited independent learning skills, modern teaching aids are underutilized, instruction is not adapted to individual differences, subject-based activity rooms are unavailable and there is a shortage of suitably qualified subject teachers. Based on these findings, the study recommends encouraging teachers to adopt innovative teaching methods, while principals, deputy principals, and sectional heads should ensure that such methods are effectively implemented by teachers.

Keywords

Classroom teaching and learning, innovative teaching methods, difficult areas

Downloads

References

1. Anderson, J. (2019). In search of reflection-in-action: A video-stimulated recall study of experienced EFL teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aruna, S., & Swarna, K. (2022). Cognitive perception for scholastic purposes using innovative teaching strategies. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience, 23(4), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.12694/scpe.v23i4.2011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Azman, M. N. B., Shuraimi, F. B. M., & Yunus, M. M. (2018). Enhancing English language learning and teaching via Qgram (Telegram and Quizlet) innovation. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(3), 435–446. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cabero-Almenara, J., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2021). Digital competence of higher education professors according to DigCompEdu: Statistical research methods with ANOVA. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4691–4708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10476-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chandrakumara, D. P. S. (2015). Regional imbalances in the distribution of educational resources in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(11), 13–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Flores, B. B., Hernández, A., García, C. T., & Claeys, L. (2011). Teacher Academy Induction Learning Community: Guiding Teachers Through Their Zone of Proximal Development. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19(3), 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2011.597124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gopinathan, S. (Ed.). (2016). Teacher development: Dimensions & perspectives (THF Workshop Reports No. 4). The HEAD Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Johnson, A. M., Jacovina, M. E., Russell, D. G., & Soto, C. M. (2016). Challenges and solutions when using technologies in the classroom. In S. A. Crossley & D. S. McNamara (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 13–29). Routledge. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED577147.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kalarajani, K. (2013). Challenges faced by schools in promoting quality education (Unpublished master’s thesis). Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kalyani, D., & Rajasekaran, K. (2018). Innovative teaching and learning. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, Suppl. 1, S23-S25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325090377 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ma, M., Lu, W., Zhang, R., Xie, W., & Qin, Q. (2023). Research on the application and effect of innovative teaching methods in college student education. Contemporary Education and Teaching Research, 4(11), 573–578. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377578964 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mikheeva, T., & Pankova, V. (2021). On the theory of innovative education. E3S Web of Conferences, 273, 12111. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. National Education Commission. (2016). Proposals for a national general education policy of Sri Lanka. Nugegoda, Sri Lanka: National Education Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sivananthan, P., (2022). Challenges Facing the Teacher Professional Development Centre in the Implementation of the Efficiency Bar Examination Programme for Teachers. Proceedings of the 2nd International Research Symposium - Faculty of Education, University of Colombo. (217 – 221). Retrieved from: https://edu.cmb.ac.lk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Symposium-Proceedings-2022-FoE-Online_-ISSN-2961-5364-2-1.pdf#page=242 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sivananthan, P., & Wedikandage, L., (2023). The Impact of Community Contribution on the Academic Achievement of Students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vii(x), 2392 – 2397. Retrieved from: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.701179 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles