Navigating Academic Integrity: Teachers’ Challenges, Responses, and Insights to Student Cheating

With the rapid advancement of technology, maintaining academic integrity has become an increasingly pressing concern in educational institutions, affecting both the credibility of academic achievements and the learning process. This phenomenological study explored the phenomenon of student cheating from the perspective of teachers in a public school in Pantukan, Davao de Oro. This is guided by the Deterrence Theory by Beccaria (1764), which posits that individuals are less likely to engage in certain behaviors if they perceive the potential consequences as severe. The participants in this study were six purposively selected public school teachers; three participated in focus group discussions (FGDs) and three in in-depth interviews (IDIs) using open-ended interview guide questions. Results revealed four major challenges: over-reliance on AI tools, similar or duplicated answers in assessments, plagiarized outputs, and mobile device-facilitated cheating. Teachers responded with strategies including establishing clear classroom rules, imposing disciplinary sanctions, monitoring and constant guidance, promoting a culture of honesty, and using AI detection tools. Their insights highlighted flexible teaching approaches, fairness and ethical responsibility, fostering independent learning, and guiding the proper use of AI tools. These findings imply that addressing academic dishonesty requires a balanced approach that combines clear rules, ethical guidance, and the strategic use of technology to uphold integrity while supporting student learning. Additionally, adopting flexible teaching methods, promoting fairness, encouraging independent learning, and providing guidance on responsible AI use can help educators prevent cheating and cultivate a culture of academic honesty.

Integrity, cheating, challenges, strategies, responses

1. Aguilar, J. (2021). The impact of online learning on academic dishonesty in secondary education. Journal of Educational Integrity, 17(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alguacil, M., Herranz Zarzoso, N., Pernías, J. C., & Sabater Grande, G. (2024). Academic dishonesty and monitoring in online exams: a randomized field experiment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36, 835–851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Avello, D., & Aranguren Zurita, S. (2025). Exploring the nexus of academic integrity and artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 21, 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-025-00199-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Balalle, H., & Pannilage, S. (2025). Reassessing academic integrity in the age of AI: A systematic literature review on AI and academic integrity. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Balbay, S., & Kilis, S. (2019). Perceived effectiveness of Turnitin® in detecting plagiarism in presentation slides. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 25-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Benson, L., & Enstroem, R. (2023). A model for preventing academic misconduct: evidence from a large scale intervention. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(25). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beruin, M. (2022). Understanding cheating behavior in secondary schools: Internal and external influences. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 78–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Birt, J., Wells, P., & Karanasios, S. (2020). The rise of essay mills and academic ghostwriting: A UK perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 45(7), 1034– 1050. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1712693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Brickhill, M., Andrews, G., & Nieuwoudt, J. (2024). Developing student agency towards academic integrity through an educative approach. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 951 975. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Çelik, Ö., & Razı, S. (2023). Facilitators and barriers to creating a culture of academic integrity at secondary schools: an exploratory case study. International Journal for Educational Integrity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cheng, Y. C., Hung, F. C., & Hsu, H. M. (2021). The relationship between academic dishonesty, ethical attitude and ethical climate: The evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability, 13(21), 11615. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Désiron, J. C. (2022). Academic dishonesty when doing homework: Digitally‑supported cheating and its predictors. Frontiers in Education, 7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Eaton, S. E. (2021). Academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and contract cheating. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00070-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. El Galad, A., Betts, D. H., & Campbell, N. (2024, April). Flexible learning dimensions in higher education: aligning students’ and educators’ perspectives for more inclusive practices. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1347432). Frontiers Media SA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Elkhatat, A. M., Elsaid, K., & Almeer, S. (2023). Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Eshet, Y. (2024). Academic integrity crisis: Exploring undergraduates’ learning motivation and personality traits. Education Sciences, 14(9), 986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Eshet, Y., & Margaliot, M. (2024). Examining the dynamics of plagiarism: A comparative analysis before, during, and after the COVID 19 pandemic. International Journal for Educational Integrity [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Furze, L., Perkins, M., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI supported assessment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gabriel, L. F. M. P., Barbosa, C. M. M. D. O., & Santos, C. M. N. (2018). A critical review of mobile learning integration in formal educational contexts. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(10). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Garg, M. (2022). A systematic literature review on online assessment security: current challenges and integrity strategies.Computers & Security, 113, 102544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102544 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gupit, E. F. E., & Cuevas, J. F. Jr. (2023). Academic dishonesty in the digital era: A case study. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Harper, R., & Prentice, F. (2024). ‘We’share but ‘They’cheat: student qualitative perspectives on cheating in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Holden, O. L. (2021). Academic integrity in online assessment: a research review. Frontiers in Education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Holden, O. L., Norris, M. E., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2021). Academic integrity in online assessment: A research review. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.639814 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Jalilzadeh, K., Rashtchi, M., & Mirzapour, F. (2024). Cheating in online assessment: a qualitative study on reasons and coping strategies focusing on EFL teachers’ perceptions. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1), 29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Janinovic, J. (2024). How can honor code and severe punishments deter academic dishonesty? (Article review). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241307430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Johnson, T., & McDonald, R. (2020). The smartphone dilemma: Cheating in the modern classroom. Journal of Educational Technology, 21(4), 199–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kaisara, G., & Barrable, A. (2023). Mobile devices and academic dishonesty in traditional face‑to‑face assessments. Strategies for Enhancing Assessment Information Integrity, 10(1), 29–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kofinas, A. K. (2025). The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Leckrone, B. (2024, August 8). College students, instructors expect more cheating due to AI: Report. BestColleges. https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/college-students-cheating-with-ai-wiley/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Lee, H. (2022). AI as a learning tool: Benefits and pitfalls. Journal of Digital Education, 19(4), 88–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ma, M., Ng, D. T. K., Liu, Z., & Wong, G. K. (2025). Fostering responsible AI literacy: A systematic review of K-12 AI ethics education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Miranda Rodríguez, R. A., Sánchez Nieto, J. M., & Ruiz Rodríguez, A. K. (2024). Effectiveness of intervention programs in reducing plagiarism by university students: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Morales, C., & Singh, V. (2020). The impact of disciplinary sanctions on academic behavior. Education and Law Journal, 16(1), 101–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Morse, A. (2022). The role of AI in academic misconduct: Challenges and prevention strategies. Journal of Digital Ethics, 19(4), 56–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Nowell, C., Norris, D., White, D., & Mouat, C. (2019). Academic integrity and technology: Addressing challenges in the digital age. Journal of Academic Ethics, 17(3), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09342-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Park, J., & Kim, H. (2024). AI as a partner in ethical education. Education & AI Integration Journal, 6(1), 14–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Prashar, A. (2024). Plagiarism awareness efforts, students’ ethical judgment and academic integrity. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2253835 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Perkins, M., Gezgin, U. B., & Roe, J. (2020). Reducing plagiarism through academic misconduct education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(1), 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ramirez, J. L. (2021). Understanding the impact of academic policies on cheating in higher education. International Journal of Educational Policy, 33(4), 301–318. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Santos, L., & Rivera, J. (2020). Designing cheating-resistant assessments. Assessment Strategies Quarterly, 5(3), 22–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Smith, K., & Jones, A. (2021). The impact of AI on student thinking skills. Technology and Learning Journal, 12(3), 56–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Smith, T. A., & Nguyen, L. (2020). Clarity and consistency: Determinants of academic integrity cultures in secondary schools. Educational Integrity Quarterly, 5(1), 22–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Thompson, J., Martinez, B., & Singh, M. (2023). AI-generated content and academic integrity. International Review of Academic Misconduct, 4(1), 89–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. UNESCO. (2026). Artificial intelligence in education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/en/digital-education/artificial-intelligence [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Wiley. (2024). AI has hurt academic integrity in college courses but can also enhance learning, say instructors, students. Wiley. https://newsroom.wiley.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2024/AI-Has-Hurt-Academic-Integrity-in-College-Courses-but-Can-Also-Enhance-Learning-Say-Instructors-Students/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Zhao, L., Mao, H., Compton, B. J., Peng, J., Fu, G., Fang, F., ... & Lee, K. (2022). Academic dishonesty and its relations to peer cheating and culture: A meta-analysis of the perceived peer cheating effect. Educational Research Review, 36, 100455. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study