Advancing Teacher Education through the Free Senior High School (Free SHS) Policy in Ghana: An Integrated Framework of Learning Theories

This article develops a framework by examining how the Free Senior High School (Free SHS) Policy can advance mathematics teacher education at the teacher training institutions in Ghana. Combining Social Cognitive Theory, Constructivist Learning Theory, Contextual Interaction Theory, and Education for Sustainable Development, this framework pays special attention to how teacher self-efficacy, pedagogical practices, and the implementation of the Free SHS policy support the policy system in enhancing student teachers’ instructional quality and sustainability competencies. This framework provides a conceptual model that connects policy, student teacher preparation, and STEM outcomes, suggesting guidance for research and practices that can strengthen mathematics education at teacher training institutions, thereby contributing to the promotion of Ghana’s national sustainable development goal.

STEM Education, Sustainable Development, Teacher Quality, Free Senior High School Policy

1. Abanyam, F. E., Abanyam, V. A., Ibelegbu, A. N., & Odozua, L. O. (2025). Effectiveness of inquiry and evidence-based pedagogies on achievement, retention, and 21st-century skills of marketing students in Nigeria. Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science, 4(03), 581-599. https://doi.org/10.56741/IISTR.jpes.001091 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akosah, E. F., Yarhands, A. D., & Obeng, B. A. (2024). Examining the mediating role of teachers’ self-efficacy on realistic mathematics education: A structural equation modeling approach. Educational Point, 1(2), e107. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/15020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al Anqodi, N., & Elgeddawy, M. (2025). AI for Enhanced Communication Skills in Dietetics: A Conceptual Framework Based on Constructivist Pedagogy. In AI and IoT: Driving Business Success and Sustainability in the Digital Age: Volume 1 (pp. 885-890). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92240-4_82 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asante Opoku, A. (2025). A comprehensive analysis of the Free Senior High School (SHS) policy in Ghana using the policy triangle framework. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14776/9876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Vol. 11). Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28), 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bano, S., Minaz, M., & Idris, Muhammad (2025). Overcrowded Classroom: Challenges for Elementary School Teachers. ProScholar Insights, 4(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.62997/psi.2025a-41036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Boaler, J. (2015). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bressers, H., & de Boer, C. (2013). Contextual Interaction Theory for Assessing water Governance, Policy and Knowledge transfer. In Water governance, policy and knowledge transfer (pp. 36-54). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bressers, H. (2009). From public administration to policy networks: Contextual interaction analysis. Rediscovering public law and public administration in comparative policy analysis: A tribute to Peter Knoepfel, 123-142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Brown, J.P., Stillman, G.A., Galbraith, P.L., Ng, K.E.D. (2024). Mathematical Modelling of Real-World Phenomena. In: Mesiti, C., et al. Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2020–2023. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1964-8_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bybee, R. W. (2018). STEM education now more than ever (pp. 1-35). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cajandig, A. J. S., & Ledesma, Z. C. (2025). The Synergy Between 21st-Century Skills and Mathematical Proficiency. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(4), 1470-1475. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cevikbas, M., Mießeler, D., & Kaiser, G. (2025). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ experiences and insights into the benefits and challenges of using explanatory videos in flipped modelling education. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 1-14.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01650-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chaiarwut, S., Srikoon, S., Siritaratiwat, A., & Kwangmuang, P. (2025). Enhancing executive mathematics problem-solving through a constructivist digital learning platform: Design, development and evaluation. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Chand, S. P. (2024). Bridging the gaps in quality education. The Educational Review, USA, 8(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.02.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Coburn, C. E., Hill, H. C., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation: The Common Core State Standards and implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243-251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16651080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Dadzie, J., Anaan-Brew, R. K., & Danso, E. (2025). Gamification in Ghanaian mathematics classrooms: Examining the roles of teacher knowledge, motivation, and self-efficacy on student engagement. American Journal of STEM Education, 15, 45-86. https://doi.org/10.32674/6b6sns36 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Darling-Hammond, L. (2023). Response to how teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 74(2), 157-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231160378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. David, K. N., & Andrews, L. (2022). Free senior high school policy in Ghana: Implementation and outcomes against policy purposes. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 6(6), 1207-1222. http://eprints.umsida.ac.id/id/eprint/10385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Dzordzormenyoh, M. K., Amoah, E., Dzordzormenyoh, C., & Domeh, J. O. (2026). Public perception of Ghana's Free Senior High School policy: A north–south comparative analysis. Review of Policy Research, 43(1), e70019. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. English, L. D. (2023). Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1219-1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01474-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(Suppl 1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. English, L. D., & Kirshner, D. (2015). Changing Agendas in International Research in Mathematics Education. In Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 3-18). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203448946 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Evans, N. (2019). Teacher education and education for sustainability. In Learning to embed sustainability in teacher education (pp. 7-21). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9536-9_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Gamage, K. A., Ekanayake, S. Y., & Dehideniya, S. C. (2022). Embedding sustainability in learning and teaching: Lessons learned and moving forward—Approaches in STEM higher education programmes. Education Sciences, 12(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hiebert, J. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1, 371. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 9(2), 187-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-1223-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Jones, L., Smith, M., Martinez, A., & Cooper, S. (2025). Using instructional coaching to support elementary preservice mathematics teachers' development of questioning strategies. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.18332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kelley, T., & Knowles, J. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Kofinti, H. K. (2025). Exploring Teachers’ Perceptions About the Implementation of Ghana’s Free Senior High School Policy Using the Contextual Interaction Theory. Interchange, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-025-09536-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Latterell, C. M., & Wilson, J. L. (2024). Mathematics, mindsets, and what it means to be do-ers of math. Irish Educational Studies, 43(3), 503-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2022.2093253 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Liu, X., Peng, M. Y. P., Anser, M. K., Chong, W. L., & Lin, B. (2020). Key teacher attitudes for sustainable development of student employability by social cognitive career theory: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and problem-based learning. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01945 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Lumpe, A., Czerniak, C., & Haney, J. (2012). Beliefs about teaching science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.551222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mapulanga, T., Jita, L. C., Murugesan, A., & Nyirenda, E. (2025). Science and Mathematics Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Enacting Learner-Centred Instructional Practices in Secondary Schools. Educational Process: International Journal, 19, e2025585. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.19.585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Australian Council of Learned Academies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. McMinn, M., Aldridge, J., & Henderson, D. (2021). Learning environment, self-efficacy for teaching mathematics, and beliefs about mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 355-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09326-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Ministry of Education. (2018). Education Strategic Plan 2018–2030. Accra: MoE. https://www.globalpartnership.org/node/document/download?file=sites/default/files/2019-05-education-strategic-plan-2018-2030.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. NaCCA. (2019). Curriculum framework for basic education. Accra, Ghana: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. https://nacca.gov.gh/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ntarmah, A. H., & Yaro, K. (2025). Teacher educational qualifications and the quality of teacher–student interactions in senior high school classrooms in Ghana: Could teacher self‐efficacy bridge the qualifications gap? Future in Educational Research, 3(2), 337-363. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.57 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Nyadzi, B., Achari, D., Tawiah, J., Koomson, M., & Mensah, R. O. (2024). Assessing the socio-economic implications of free senior high school (SHS) policy on tertiary Institutions in Ghana: a case study of the Western Region. Open Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.31586/ojer.2024.950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. OECD (2019). An OECD Learning Framework 2030. In: Bast, G., Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J. (eds) The Future of Education and Labor. Arts, Research, Innovation and Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26068-2_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Olawale, B. E., Hendricks, W., & Saddiq, K. (2025). Education for sustainable development and its implications for the preparation of pre-service mathematics teachers. Open Books and Proceedings, Six-88. https://doi.org/10.38140/obp3-2025-06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Oppong-Gyebi, E., Bonyah, E., & Clark, L. J. (2023). Constructive instructional teaching and learning approaches and their mathematical classroom teaching practices: A junior high school perspective. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(1), ep23002. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12541 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Owusu-Cole, C. (2023). Influence of Continuous Professional Development Practices on Tutor Effectiveness in the Colleges of Education in Ghana (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Coast). http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11927 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Putri, L. I., Dwiningrum, S. I. A., Retnawati, H., Begimbetova, G. A., & Salem, S. (2025). How is The Impact of Applying the Contextual Approach in Mathematics Learning?. Attadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 8(1), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v8i1.888 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Rieckmann, M. (2018). Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in Education for Sustainable Development. Issues and trends in education for sustainable development, 39(1), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.54675/YELO2332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The dynamics of human behavior. New York, NY: Guilford Press. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2020_RyanDeci_CEP_PrePrint.pdf#:~:text=We%20review%20research%20from%20SDT,varied%20educational%20levels%20and%20cultural [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Salifu, I., Iddris, F., Owusu-Agyeman, Y., & Eshun, S. N. (2025). The influence of professional development on quality teaching in Ghanaian pre-tertiary schools. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102196 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Spillane, J. P. (2021). Educational leadership and policy implementation: Bridging theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical thinking and learning, 10(4), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Takyi, B., Yalley, C. E., Owusu, F., & Fynn, P. A. (2025). Challenges towards the implementation of the standards-based curriculum in Ghana: A systematic review. International Journal of Instruction, 18(3), 577-594. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18330a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Tang, W. C. (2025). Innovative Mathematics Pedagogy: Evidence-Based Strategies for Enhancing Student Learning. Journal of Integrative Education Studies, 1(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.64229/2q2ck886 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of educational research, 68(2), 202-248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (2021). Global teacher shortage report. Paris: UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003179900 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning objectives. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444e.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY: United Nations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press. https://home.fau.edu/musgrove/web/vygotsky1978.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. WAEC. (School set 2025). West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE). Chief Examiners' Report, Core Mathematics. https://share.google/MRbYbpRbfYRfsQSfW [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Wals, A. E. (2017). Sustainability by default: Co-creating care and relationality through early childhood education. International Journal of Early Childhood, 49(2), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-017-0193-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Peer-Assisted Learning as a Pathway to Academic Success: Unpacking the Mediating Role of Mathematics Attitude and the Moderating Effects of Interest.
• The Role of Teacher Preparation, Instructional Materials, and Assessment Practices on Student Performance in Mathematical Literacy Based on the PISA Framework: A Systematic Literature Review
• The Impact of Examination-Oriented Teaching on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Mathematics in Senior High Schools in the Volta Region of Ghana
• Leveraging Differentiated Instruction to Foster Critical Thinking, Creativity, Collaboration and Communication In 21st Century Mathematics Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review
• Path Analysis of Teaching Approaches on Mathematics Performance Via Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review