Pathways to Redemption: Lived Experiences of Drug Offenders in Rehab

This study explored the lived experiences of drug offenders who underwent rehabilitation programs in selected areas of Mindanao, Philippines. It aimed to describe their rehabilitation experiences, examine the challenges they encountered during and after treatment, and generate insights to inform more responsive recovery interventions in the regional context. The study employed a qualitative research design using a Husserlian transcendental phenomenological approach. Data were gathered through in-depth, semistructured interviews with participants who had completed formal rehabilitation programs, selected using snowball sampling. Thematic analysis was conducted following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) framework, as cited by Daymiel (2025), involving the extraction of significant statements, the formulation of meanings, and the clustering of statements into themes. Five emergent themes were identified: (1) From Compulsion to Self-Realization, (2) Relational-Spiritual Reorientation, (3) Sustained Recovery and Accountability, (4) Inner Transformation Through Psychological Struggle, and (5) Post-Rehabilitation Social Reintegration and Identity Reconstruction. Findings revealed that rehabilitation initially elicited resistance and emotional distress but gradually fostered acceptance, self-awareness, and personal responsibility. Family separation and spiritual reflection emerged as powerful catalysts for change, while recovery was understood as a lifelong process requiring discipline beyond institutional care. Despite internal transformation, reintegration remained difficult due to stigma, employment barriers, and social mistrust. The study concludes that effective rehabilitation in Mindanao requires holistic, community-based systems that integrate psychological care, family involvement, spiritual support, and structured aftercare to sustain long-term recovery and reintegration.

drug rehabilitation, lived experiences, recovery

1. Amnesty International. (2024). Drug policy reform: Addressing the harms of punitive approaches. Amnesty International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Araujo, C. N. D. P., & Corradi-Webster, C. M. (2022). Meanings constructed by family members about coerced treatment for alcohol and drug use in Brazil. International Journal of Drug Policy, 99, 103466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bassuk, E. L., Hanson, J., Greene, R. N., Richard, M., & Laudet, A. (2016). Peer-delivered recovery support services for addictions in the United States: A systematic review. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 63, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beaudry, G., Yu, R., Perry, A. E., & Fazel, S. (2021). Effectiveness of psychological interventions in prison to reduce recidivism: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(9), 759-773. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Best, D., & Laudet, A. (2019). The potential of recovery capital. Addiction Research & Theory, 27(3), 189–192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Best, D., Irving, J., & Albertson, K. (2016). Recovery and desistance: What the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending. Addiction Research & Theory, 25(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Best, D., Musgrove, A., & Hall, L. (2018). The bridge between social identity and community capital. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 13(2–3), 79–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bielenberg, J., Swisher, G., Lembke, A., & Haug, N. A. (2021). A stigma framework for addiction. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 15(4), 273–280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Boness, C. L., Magill, M., & Barnett, N. P. (2023). Cognitive behavioral therapy for substance use disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 25(3), 113–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bratt, S. (2025). Structural and cultural barriers to integrated care for co-existing mental health and substance use: a morphogenetic analysis. Discover Public Health, 22(1), 354. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cain, D. J. (2020). Person-centered psychotherapies. In D. J. Cain & J. Seeman (Eds.), Humanistic psychotherapies: Handbook of research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 3–36). American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cernasev, A., Hohmeier, K. C., Frederick, K., Jasmin, H., & Gatwood, J. (2021). A systematic literature review of patient perspectives of barriers and facilitators to access, adherence, stigma, and persistence to treatment for substance use disorder. Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2, 100029. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Crewe, B., Liebling, A., & Hulley, S. (2017). Heavy–light, absent–present: rethinking the ‘weight’ of imprisonment. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 387-410. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Csete, J., Kamarulzaman, A., Kazatchkine, M., Altice, F., Balicki, M., Buxton, J., ... & Beyrer, C. (2016). Public health and international drug policy. The lancet, 387(10026), 1427-1480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Daymiel, J. R. (2025). The odyssey of gigolos in Southern Philippines: Perks and drawbacks. International Journal of Biosciences, 26(1), 88-106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Degenhardt, L., Grebely, J., Stone, J., Hickman, M., Vickerman, P., Marshall, B. D., ... & Larney, S. (2019). Global patterns of opioid use and dependence: harms to populations, interventions, and future action. The Lancet, 394(10208), 1560-1579. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Earnshaw, V. A. (2020). Stigma and substance use disorders: A clinical, research, and advocacy agenda. American Psychologist, 75(9), 1300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. El Hayek, S., Cheaito, M. A., Nofal, M., Abdelrahman, D., Adra, A., Al Shamli, S., … Akl, E. A. (2024). Stigma and discrimination against people with substance use disorders: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 24, Article 91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Eriksson, M., Sundberg, L. R., Santosa, A., Lindgren, H., Ng, N., & Lindvall, K. (2025). Health behavioural change–the influence of social-ecological factors and health identity. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 20(1), 2458309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. (2023). European drug report 2023. Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. (2023). European drug report 2023: Trends and developments. Publications Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Farhoudian, A., Razaghi, E., Hooshyari, Z., Noroozi, A., Pilevari, A., Mokri, A., ... & Malekinejad, M. (2022). Barriers and facilitators to substance use disorder treatment: An overview of systematic reviews. Substance abuse: research and treatment, 16, 11782218221118462. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Fomiatti, R., Moore, D., & Fraser, S. (2019). The improvable self: Enacting model citizenship and sociality in research on ‘new recovery’. Addiction Research & Theory, 27(6), 527-538. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Forsberg, L., & Douglas, T. (2022). What is criminal rehabilitation?. Criminal law and Philosophy, 16(1), 103-126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Giorgi, A., Giorgi, B., & Morley, J. (2017). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 176–192). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Gone, J. P., Hartmann, W. E., Pomerville, A., Wendt, D. C., Klem, S. H., & Burrage, R. L. (2019). The impact of historical trauma on health outcomes for indigenous populations in the USA and Canada: A systematic review. American Psychologist, 74(1), 20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. González-Roz, A., Castano, Y., Krotter, A., Salazar-Cedillo, A., & Gervilla, E. (2024). Emotional dysregulation in relation to substance use and behavioral addictions: Findings from five separate meta-analyses. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 24(3), 100502. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Grim, B. J., & Grim, M. E. (2019). Belief, behavior, and belonging: How faith is indispensable in preventing and recovering from substance abuse. Journal of religion and health, 58(5), 1713-1750. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hagger, M. S., et al. (2020). Self-regulation and behavior change. Health Psychology Review, 14(1), 1–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Gurung, R. A. R., & Radosevich, D. (2016). Culture and mental health. Encyclopedia of mental health, 402-406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N., & Lintunen, T. (Eds.). (2020). The handbook of behavior change. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Han, L., & Jia, C. X. (2022). Treatments, perceived stigma, and employment outcomes among substance abusers in China. In Healthcare (Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 130). MDPI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Hashemzadeh, M., Shamsi, M., & Moradi, A. (2019). The effectiveness of the Transtheoretical Model on addiction treatment outcomes: A systematic review. Addiction & Health, 11(4), 250–259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2016). Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. American journal of public health, 103(5), 813-821. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hendershot, C. S., Witkiewitz, K., George, W. H., & Marlatt, G. A. (2018). Relapse prevention for addictive behaviors. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Försterling, F. (2021). Attribution theory in clinical and health psychology. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Hudson, J. R., & Manuel, J. (2023). Barriers to substance use treatment for individuals with substance use disorders. Research Square, rs-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Humphreys, G., & Finch, N. (2025). Experiences of a lived experience recovery organisation for those in abstinence-based substance use recovery: a thematic analysis. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 20(1), 41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Kelly, J. F., Bergman, B. G., Hoeppner, B. B., Vilsaint, C., & White, W. L. (2017). Prevalence and pathways of recovery from drug and alcohol problems in the United States population: Implications for practice, research, and policy. Drug and alcohol dependence, 181, 162-169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Kelly, J. F., Bergman, B. G., Hoeppner, B. B., Vilsaint, C., & White, W. L. (2017). Prevalence and pathways of recovery from drug and alcohol problems in the United States population: Implications for practice, research, and policy. Drug and alcohol dependence, 181, 162-169. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kelly, J. F., Greene, M. C., & Bergman, B. G. (2016). Beyond abstinence: Changes in indices of quality of life with time in recovery in a nationally representative sample of US adults. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 42(4), 770-780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Kelly, J. F., Humphreys, K., & Ferri, M. (2020). Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12‐step programs for alcohol use disorder. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Kitt-Lewis, E., & Phillips, K. (2025). Stigma surrounding people with substance use disorder: A scoping review. Substance Use & Misuse. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Kleber, H. D. (2018). Pharmacologic treatments for opioid dependence: Detoxification and maintenance options. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 20(1), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Krebs, P., Prochaska, J. O., & Rossi, J. S. (2018). A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Preventive Medicine, 51(3–4), 214–221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Laudet, A. B., & White, W. L. (2018). Recovery capital. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 86, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Magill, M., Ray, L., Kiluk, B., Hoadley, A., Bernstein, M., Tonigan, J. S., & Carroll, K. (2023). A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy for alcohol or other drug use disorders: Treatment efficacy by contrast condition. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 87(12), 1093. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Mahon, D. (2025). A systematic review of trauma informed care in substance use settings. Community mental health journal, 61(4), 734-753. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Malle, B. F. (2022). Attribution theories: How people make sense of behavior. Theories in Social Psychology, Second Edition, 93-120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative health research, 26(13), 1753-1760. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Marmot, M. (2020). Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on. Bmj, 368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Maruna, S. (2017). Desistance and restorative justice: it’s now or never. Restorative Justice. 4. 289-301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. McHugh, R. K., Hearon, B. A., & Otto, M. W. (2016). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for substance use disorders. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 33(3), 511. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. McKay, J. R. (2021). Impact of continuing care on recovery from substance use disorder. Alcohol research: current reviews, 41(1), 01. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. McKay, J. R., & Hiller-Sturmhöfel, S. (2018). Continuing care. Alcohol Research, 39(1), 55–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Miller, J. (2025). The Mark of a Criminal Record: Unpacking Stigma and Barriers to Reentry. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Moore, K. E., Roberts, W., Reid, H. H., Smith, K. M., Oberleitner, L. M., & McKee, S. A. (2019). Effectiveness of medication-assisted treatment for opioid use in prison and jail settings: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 99, 32-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European journal of general practice, 24(1), 918. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Neale, J., Nettleton, S., & Pickering, L. (2016). Recovery as identity change. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(1), 84–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Neale, J., Nettleton, S., & Pickering, L. (2015). Recovery as identity change. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(1), 84–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on medical education, 8(2), 90-97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Norcross, J. C., & Wampold, B. E. (2018). A new therapy for each patient: Evidence‐based relationships and responsiveness. Journal of clinical psychology, 74(11), 1889-1906. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Nugent, B., & Schinkel, M. (2016). The pains of desistance. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(5), 568-584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Opsal, A., Kristensen, Ø., & Clausen, T. (2019). Readiness to change among involuntarily and voluntarily admitted patients with substance use disorders. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 14(1), 47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Orford, J., Copello, A., Velleman, R., & Templeton, L. (2017). Family members affected by a close relative's addiction: The stress-strain-coping-support model. Drugs: education, prevention and policy, 17(sup1), 36-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Parker, C., Scott, S., & Geddes, A. (2019). Snowball sampling. SAGE research methods foundations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2016). Desistance and the feared self. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(4), 1103–1156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Pham, H., Lin, C., Zhu, Y., Clingan, S. E., Lin, L., Mooney, L. J., ... & Hser, Y. I. (2025). Telemedicine-delivered treatment for substance use disorder: A scoping review. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 31(3), 359-375. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., & Evers, K. E. (2020). The Transtheoretical Model and stages of change. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice (6th ed., pp. 125–148). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Resnik, D. B. (2020). The ethics of research with human subjects. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Roche, A. M., Kostadinov, V., Pidd, K., & Trifonoff, A. (2019). Addressing workforce challenges in alcohol and other drug treatment. Drug and Alcohol Review, 38(3), 273– 283. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Roche, A., Kostadinov, V., Fischer, J., Nicholas, R., O'Rourke, K., Pidd, K., & Trifonoff, A. (2016). Addressing inequities in alcohol consumption and related harms. Health promotion international, 30(suppl_2), ii20-ii35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Silcox, J., Rapisarda, S. S., Hughto, J. M., Vento, S., Case, P., Palacios, W. R., ... & Green, T. C. (2024). Views and experiences of involuntary civil commitment of people who use drugs in Massachusetts (Section 35). Drug and alcohol dependence, 263, 112391. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Stevens, A., et al. (2019). Compulsory drug treatment outcomes. European Addiction Research, 25(4), 201–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Stevens, A., Hughes, C. E., Hulme, S., & Cassidy, R. (2022). Depenalization, diversion, and health-oriented responses to drug offending: Comparative lessons for criminal justice systems. International Journal of Drug Policy, 102, 103607. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2020). Recovery-oriented systems of care (ROSC) resource guide. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2020). Treatment improvement protocol (TIP) 57: Trauma-informed care in behavioral health services. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Ting, R. S. K., Ahmad Azlan, D. S., Liem, A., Thong, J. J. A., Krishnan, L., Ortega, A., ... & Su, T. T. (2025). A qualitative study on the perceptions toward illness and modern health care among Indigenous people in Peninsular Malaysia. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 1177180 1251388495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Torrens, M., Mestre-Pintó, J. I., & Domingo-Salvany, A. (2016). Comorbidity of substance use and mental disorders in Europe. Publication Office of the European Union. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Tuffour, I. (2017). A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A contemporary qualitative research approach. Journal of healthcare communications, 2(4), 52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Turney, K., & Wakefield, S. (2019). Criminal justice contact and inequality. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(1), 1-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. UNODC. (2018). World Drug Report 2018. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Vagle, M. D. (2018). Crafting phenomenological research. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Van Manen, M. (2023). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Velicer, W. F., Prochaska, J. O., & Redding, C. A. (2022). Tailoring interventions to stage of change: Applications and implications. Health Psychology Review, 16(3), 377–395. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Vidales, C. A. (2022). Stigma of seeking help for alcohol misuse among men of color. Iowa State University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Vilsaint, C. L., Tansey, A. G., Hennessy, E. A., Eddie, D., Hoffman, L. A., & Kelly, J. F. (2025). Recovery housing for substance use disorder: a systematic review. Frontiers in public health, 13, 1506412. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Volkow, N. D., & Blanco, C. (2023). Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention. World Psychiatry, 22(2), 203-229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Volkow, N. D., Koob, G. F., & McLellan, A. T. (2016). Neurobiological advances from the brain disease model of addiction. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(4), 363-371. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Ward, T. & Durrant, R. (2021). Practice Frameworks in Correctional Psychology: Translating Causal theories and Normative Assumptions into Practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Weaver, B. (2019). Understanding desistance: a critical review of theories of desistance. Psychology, Crime & Law. 25. 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Weiner, B. (2018). The legacy of an attribution approach to motivation and emotion: A nocrisis zone. Motivation science, 4(1), 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. World Health Organization. (2019). Community management of opioid overdose (Rev. ed.). World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. World Health Organization. (2022). Community management of opioid overdose (Rev. ed.). World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Yang, L. H., Wong, L. Y., Grivel, M. M., & Hasin, D. S. (2017). Stigma and substance use disorders: an international phenomenon. Current opinion in psychiatry, 30(5), 378-388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Zahavi, D. (2019). Phenomenology: The Basics. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study