Molecular Docking and Simulation in Drug Discovery: A Review
Authors
UG student, Ravishankar College of Pharmacy, Bhanpur, Bhopal (MP), India, 462031 (India)
UG student, Ravishankar College of Pharmacy, Bhanpur, Bhopal (MP), India, 462031 (India)
UG student, Ravishankar College of Pharmacy, Bhanpur, Bhopal (MP), India, 462031 (India)
UG student, Ravishankar College of Pharmacy, Bhanpur, Bhopal (MP), India, 462031 (India)
PG Scholar, Ravishankar College of Pharmacy, Bhanpur, Bhopal (MP), India, 462037 (India)
lecturer Ravishankar College of Pharmacy, Bhanpur, Bhopal (MP), India, 462031 (India)
Associate Professor Ravishankar College of Pharmacy, Bhanpur, Bhopal (MP), India, 462031 (India)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-02
Accepted: 2026-05-07
Published: 2026-05-27
Abstract
Drug discovery is a complex, time-consuming, and costly process that requires the identification and optimization of potential therapeutic compounds. In recent years, computational approaches such as molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation have significantly transformed modern drug design. These techniques, which fall under the domain of Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD), provide efficient and cost-effective strategies for analyzing molecular interactions and predicting drug behavior.Molecular docking is widely used to predict the binding orientation and affinity of ligands toward target proteins, thereby facilitating the identification of promising lead compounds. On the other hand, molecular dynamics simulation provides detailed insights into the structural flexibility, stability, and dynamic behavior of biomolecular systems under physiological conditions. Additionally, structure-based and ligand-based drug design approaches further enhance the efficiency of identifying and optimizing drug candidates.The integration of molecular docking with MD simulation has emerged as a powerful strategy, combining the speed of docking with the accuracy of dynamic simulations. This combined approach improves the reliability of predicting protein-ligand interactions and reduces the need for extensive experimental validation. Overall, these computational tools play a crucial role in accelerating the drug discovery process, minimizing costs, and enhancing the success rate of developing effective therapeutic agents.
Keywords
Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD), Protein-Ligand Interaction, Drug Discovery.
Downloads
References
1. Umar HI, Siraj B, Ajayi A, Jimoh TO, Chukwuemeka PO (2021) Molecular docking studies of some selected gallic acid derivatives against five non-structural proteins of novel coronavirus. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 19(1):16. doi:10.1186/s43141-021-00120-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. OEA, AAA, UCE, JGE, AIE (2024) The synergy of molecular docking and bioinformatics: An in depth review in drug discovery. Biotechnol J Int 28(4):119–136. doi:10.9734/bji/2024/v28i4732. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Kumar A, Mishra B, Konar AD, Mylonakis E, Basu A (2024) Molecular dynamics simulations help determine the molecular mechanisms of Lasioglossin-III and its variant peptides’ membrane interfacial interactions. J Phys Chem B 128(25):6049–6058. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c02387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Mursal M, Ahmad M, Hussain S, Faraz Khan M (2024) Navigating the computational seas: A comprehensive overview of molecular docking software in drug discovery. doi:10.5772/intechopen.1004802. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Singh S, Baker QB, Singh DB, Santos D (2020) CO. pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Oselusi SO, et al. (2024) The role and potential of computer-aided drug discovery strategies in the discovery of novel antimicrobials. Comput Biol Med 169:107927. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.107927. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bhagat RT, et al. (2021) Molecular docking in drug discovery. J Pharm Res Int 33:46–58. doi:10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i30b31639. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bindu PV (2018) Structure-based drug design delivers. YouTube 9(2014419001):1–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bera I, Payghan PV (2019) Use of molecular dynamics simulations in structure-based drug discovery. Curr Pharm Des 25(31):3339–3349. doi:10.2174/1381612825666190903153043. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Batool M, Ahmad B, Choi S (2019) A structure-based drug discovery paradigm. Int J Mol Sci 20(11). doi:10.3390/ijms20112783. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Okafo SE, Anie CO, Arerusuoghene CA, Nwankwo LU (2023) Evaluation of physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of creams formulated using Pterocarpus santalinoides seeds methanol extract. J Appl Pharm Sci. doi:10.7324/JAPS.2023.19934. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Gautam S, Pathak S, Dubey SH (2024) The role of molecular docking in modern drug discovery and development: A comprehensive review. J Drug Discov Heal 1(03):129–137. doi:10.21590/jddhs.01.03.02. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Astalakshmi D, et al. (2022) Over view on molecular docking: A powerful approach for structure based drug discovery. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 77(2):146–157. doi:10.47583/ijpsrr.2022.v77i02.029. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. K D, Venugopal S (2024) Molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulation studies to identify potential terpenes against Internalin A protein of Listeria monocytogenes. Front Bioinforma 4. doi:10.3389/fbinf.2024.1463750. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Patel JR, Joshi HV, Shah UA, Patel JK (2022) A review on computational software tools for drug design and discovery. Indo Glob J Pharm Sci 12:53–81. doi:10.35652/IGJPS.2022.12006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Pagadala NS, Syed K, Tuszynski J (2017) Software for molecular docking: A review. Biophys Rev 9(2):91–102. doi:10.1007/S12551-016-0247-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Nadaf T, et al. (2023) Molecular docking: Types, applications and approach in novel drug design. IJRti 8(10):175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Chaudhary M, Tyagi K (2024) A review on molecular docking and its application. Int J Adv Res 12(03):1141–1153. doi:10.21474/IJAR01/18505. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Raval K, Ganatra T (2022) Basics, types and applications of molecular docking: A review. IP Int J Compr Adv Pharmacol 7(1):12–16. doi:10.18231/j.ijcaap.2022.003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Agu PC, et al. (2023) Molecular docking as a tool for the discovery of molecular targets of nutraceuticals in diseases management. Sci Rep 13(1):1–18. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-40160-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Aghajani J, Farnia P, Farnia P, Ghanavi J, Velayati AA (2022) Molecular dynamic simulations and molecular docking as a potential way for designed new inhibitor drug without resistance. Tanaffos 21(1):1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Barbhuiya S, Das BB (2023) Molecular dynamics simulation in concrete research: A systematic review of techniques, models and future directions. J Build Eng 76:107267. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Shannon RE (1992) Introduction to simulation. Proc Winter Simul Conf:65–73. doi:10.1145/167293.167302. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Hollingsworth SA, Dror RO (2018) Molecular dynamics simulation for all. Neuron 99(6):1129–1143. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Choi SB, Yap BK, Choong YS, Wahab H (2018) Molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery. Encycl Bioinforma Comput Biol 1–3(11):652–665. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20154-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Salo-Ahen OMH, et al. (2021) Pharmaceutical development. pp. 1–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Brooijmans N, Kuntz ID (2003) Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 32(1):335–373. doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.142532. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Borhani DW, Shaw DE (2012) On the application of accelerated molecular dynamics to liquid water simulations. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26(1):15–26. doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9517-y. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Liu X, Shi D, Zhou S, Liu H, Liu H, Yao X (2018) Molecular dynamics simulations and novel drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 13(1):23–37. doi:10.1080/17460441.2018.1403419. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Ganesan A, Coote ML, Barakat K (2017) Molecular dynamics-driven drug discovery: Leaping forward with confidence. Drug Discov Today 22(2):249–269. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2016.11.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. De Vivo M, Masetti M, Bottegoni G, Cavalli A (2016) Role of molecular dynamics and related methods in drug discovery. J Med Chem 59(9):4035–4061. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01684. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Badar MS, Shamsi S, Ahmed J, Alam MA (2022) Molecular dynamics simulations: Concept, methods, and applications. pp. 131–151. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94651-7_7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Padhi AK, Janežič M, Zhang KYJ (2022) Molecular dynamics simulations: Principles, methods, and applications in protein conformational dynamics. In: Advances in Protein Molecular and Structural Biology Methods. Elsevier, pp. 439–454. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-90264-9.00026-X. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Salo-Ahen OMH, et al. (2020) Molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery and pharmaceutical development. Processes 9(1):71. doi:10.3390/pr9010071. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJC (1990) Computer simulation of molecular dynamics: Methodology, applications, and perspectives in chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 29(9):992–1023. doi:10.1002/anie.199009921. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Bunker A, Róg T (2020) Mechanistic understanding from molecular dynamics simulation in pharmaceutical research 1: Drug delivery. Front Mol Biosci 7. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.604770. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Martínez-Rosell G, Giorgino T, Harvey MJ, de Fabritiis G (2017) Drug discovery and molecular dynamics: Methods, applications and perspective beyond the second timescale. Curr Top Med Chem 17(23). doi:10.2174/1568026617666170414142549. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Alder BJ, Wainwright TE (1959) Studies in molecular dynamics. I. General method. J Chem Phys 31(2):459–466. doi:10.1063/1.1730376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Garduño-Juárez R, et al. (2024) Molecular dynamic simulations for biopolymers with biomedical applications. Polymers 16(13):1864. doi:10.3390/polym16131864. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Veettil SK, Rajiah K (2016) Use of simulation in pharmacy practice and implementation in undergraduate pharmacy curriculum in India. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 8(7):1–5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Filipe HAL, Loura LMSL (2022) Molecular dynamics simulations: Advances and applications. Molecules 27(7):2105. doi:10.3390/molecules27072105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Luan T (2024) A comprehensive review of simulation technology: Development, methods, applications, challenges and future trends. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Appl 1(5):9–14. doi:10.62677/ijetaa.2405119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Ma Z, Ajibade A, Zou X (2024) Docking strategies for predicting protein-ligand interactions and their application to structure-based drug design. Commun Inf Syst 24(3):199–230. doi:10.4310/CIS.241021221101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Zavodszky MI, Rohatgi A, Van Voorst JR, Yan H, Kuhn LA (2009) Scoring ligand similarity in structure-based virtual screening. J Mol Recognit 22(4):280–292. doi:10.1002/jmr.942. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Wang R, Lai L, Wang S (2002) Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16(1):11–26. doi:10.1023/A:1016357811882. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Paul N, Rognan D (2002) ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein–ligand interactions. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 47(4):521–533. doi:10.1002/prot.10119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Shin WH, Seok C (2012) GalaxyDock: Protein–ligand docking with flexible protein side-chains. J Chem Inf Model 52(12):3225–3232. doi:10.1021/ci300342z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Shin WH, Seok C (2012) GalaxyDock: Protein–ligand docking with flexible protein side-chains. J Chem Inf Model 52(12):3225–3232. doi:10.1021/CI300342Z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Yan C, Zou X (2015) MDock: An ensemble docking suite for molecular docking, scoring and in silico screening. pp. 153–166. doi:10.1007/7653_2015_62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Gopinath P, Kathiravan MK (2021) Docking studies and molecular dynamics simulation of triazole benzene sulfonamide derivatives with human carbonic anhydrase IX inhibition activity. RSC Adv 11(60):38079–38093. doi:10.1039/d1ra07377j. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- QbD Approach to Hplc Method Development and Validation of the Simultaneous Estimation of Sulbactum and Durlobactum in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form
- A Review on an Evaluation of a Liposomal Hydrogel for Combined Minoxidil and Tretinoin Delivery in Androgenetic Alopecia
- Qualitative Screening and Analysis of Lunasia amara Blanco (Tawal-ulad) Ethanolic Leaves Extract as Potential Anti-Angiogenic Inhibitors Using the Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay on Mallard Duck Embryo
- A Comprehensive Review on Calotropis Procera on Its Analgesic Activity
- Formulation, Characterization and In-Vitro Evaluation of Curcumin Loaded Liposome for Colon Drug delivery