Social Skills of School Heads in Cervantes District

Social skills refer to a complex set of interpersonal competencies that enable individuals to communicate effectively, collaborate with others, and build meaningful relationships across diverse social contexts (Pereira, 2023; Hou, 2022). In the context of educational leadership, these skills include active listening, empathy, conflict resolution, effective communication, and the ability to establish trust among stakeholders such as teachers, learners, parents, and community members (Sorbet & Notar, 2020). School heads who possess well-developed social skills are better positioned to create inclusive learning environments, strengthen school-community partnerships, and effectively advocate for the needs of their institutions (Wang & Zhang, 2024).
In addition, the importance of social skills in leadership is further explained through the socio-emotional competence framework, which includes five core domains: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making (Sorbet & Notar, 2020). These competencies are essential for school leaders as they influence their ability to manage complex school environments, build collaborative cultures, and promote positive school climates (Kubota & Koike, 2022).
The development of social skills among school leaders also aligns with global educational priorities, particularly the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals) (United Nations, 2022). Educational leaders with strong interpersonal competencies are more capable of establishing partnerships with stakeholders, including parents, local government units, and community organizations, which are essential in promoting inclusive and equitable education (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO], 2021; Darling-Hammond et al., 2020). These partnerships contribute to resource mobilization, shared decision-making, and the implementation of innovative educational programs that improve student outcomes.
Moreover, socially competent school leaders contribute to the development of supportive and inclusive school environments that address diverse learner needs and promote well-being. According to the World Bank (2021) and UNICEF (2020), effective leadership that emphasizes collaboration and communication fosters stronger community engagement and sustainable educational development. Similarly, Leithwood et al. (2020) emphasized that leadership practices grounded in strong social relationships significantly influence school improvement and student achievement.
Globally, there is increasing recognition of the role of school leadership in improving educational quality, leading to initiatives aimed at strengthening leadership competencies, including social skills. Studies by the European Commission (2022) and Darling-Hammond et al. (2020) highlight that school leaders who demonstrate strong interpersonal and communication skills are more effective in managing change, resolving conflicts, and building collaborative school cultures. Additionally, Hallinger (2020) emphasized that leadership effectiveness is closely linked to the ability of school heads to engage stakeholders and foster trust within the school community.

NA

1. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andalan, M. (2025). Social competence of principals and performance of integrated schools in Glan, Sarangani Province. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andrade, C., & Carvalho, M. (2024). Teacher burnout and emotional competence in educational leadership. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 15(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Atari, M., (2020). Gender differences in moral reasoning across cultures. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 80–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2020). SEL framework. https://casel.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dargantes, M. O. (2020). Qualities of leadership relating to management skills of school heads. SMCC Higher Education Research Journal, 7(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Darling-Hammond, L., (2020). Educational leadership and student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 567–579. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dellomas, J. L., & Deri, R. (2022). Leadership practices of school heads in public schools. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 4(2), 13–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Department of Education. (2020). Philippine professional standards for school heads (PPSSH). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp content/uploads/2020/09/DO_s2020_024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Education. (2025, May 9). DepEd memorandum no. 042, s. 2025: 2025 Brigada Eskwela implementing guidelines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/DM_s2025_042.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. European Commission. (2022). Supporting school leaders: A policy handbook. https://op.europa.eu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Frydenberg, E., (2019). Social-emotional learning and student development. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 765–789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Garcia, M. (2022). School-community partnerships and leadership effectiveness. Journal of School Administration, 14(1), 25–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Garcia, R., (2021). Gender and leadership styles in education. Leadership Quarterly, 32(3), 101–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Garcia-Martinez, I., Tadeu, P., Montenegro-Rueda, M., & Fernandez- Batanero, J. M. (2022). Networking for online teacher collaboration. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1736–1750. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817760 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gomez, L. (2020). Professional networks and school leadership. Asian Journal of Education, 7(2), 66–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Grande, H. R., Pore Jr., N. O., Tangapa, B. J., Maiz, D. H., & Bauyot, M. M. (2024). Exploring the impact of school heads’ instructional management, emotional intelligence, and leadership skills on teachers’ work values. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Gurieva, S., (2022). Gender norms and leadership perception. Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 89–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership and school improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(6), 985– 1001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hou, Y. (2022). Social skills and interpersonal communication. Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 123–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Jesus, E. O. (2025). School heads’ leadership styles and external stakeholders' involvement: School-community partnership program. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kim, S. (2020). Age and leadership effectiveness in schools. Educational Leadership Review, 21(1), 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kubota, K., & Koike, T. (2022). Socio-emotional competence in school leadership. International Journal of Educational Development, 85, 102–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lagbao, R. (2024). Educational reforms and leadership challenges in the Philippines. Philippine Education Review, 9(2), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lazaro, P., (2024). Age diversity in school leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(3), 201–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lee, K., (2025). Professional development and stakeholder relations. Journal of Leadership Development, 11(1), 90–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Lim, A., & Reyes, P. (2022). School size and leadership dynamics. Asian Journal of Educational Studies, 6(2), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Luzano, D. (2024). Community engagement programs in Philippine schools. Journal of Community Education, 5(1), 60– 75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. McWayne, C. M., Melzi, G., & Mistry, J. (2022). A home-to-school approach for promoting culturally inclusive family–school partnership research and practice. Educational Psychologist, 57(4), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2108648 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Mendoza, R., & Cruz, P. (2024). Partnership sustainability in education. Educational Development Journal, 10(3), 110–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Miri, M., & Shahrokh, Z. (2019). Comparative research design in education. Educational Research Journal, 7(1), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Notar, C. E., & Sorbet, S. R. (2020). The Bridge to Learning is You The Teacher!. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(4), 462- 482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Olanrewaju, A. K., Omolayo, A. B., Elizabeth, A. O., Aishat, O. O., & Chinedu, O. S. (2025). School heads’ supervisory skills, communication skills and motivational skills as predictors of teachers’ productivity in public senior secondary schools in 39. Ogun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2021). School leadership and governance. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Osman, R., & Adanza, G. (2024). Professional standards and leadership competencies. Philippine Journal of Education, 11(1), 44–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Owan, V. J., Asuquo, M. E., & Etudo-Eyor, E. (2025). Leadership styles, public relation skills and school-community collaboration: A quantitative analysis of the perception of stakeholders. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 28(4), 715–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2022.2092170 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Özgünlü, M., (2022). Stress and emotional competence among educators. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 455–470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Pascual, J. (2023). Leadership roles and stakeholder support in Philippine schools. Journal of Educational Policy, 8(2), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Pereira, L. (2023). Interpersonal competencies in leadership. Journal of Social Development, 19(1), 75–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Ramirez, J., & Santos, K. (2024). Leadership rank and community engagement. Journal of Educational Leadership, 12(3), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Rehman, S., (2021). Leadership styles and age differences. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 16(1), 120–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Reyes, M. (2020). Administrative rank and leadership complexity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 678–695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Rodriguez, P. (2023). Proactive leadership and school partnerships. Journal of School Management, 9(2), 70–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Santos, L. (2023). Integrated school leadership challenges. Philippine Education Journal, 10(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Santos, R. (2024). Professional memberships and leadership development. Journal of Professional Education, 14(1), 40–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Smith, J. (2021). Generational leadership in education. Educational Leadership Review, 22(1), 15–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Sorbet, B., & Notar, C. (2022). Social-emotional competencies in leadership. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 400–415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Tan, M. (2023). Managing integrated school systems. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(2), 210–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education – All means all. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379709 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. UNICEF. (2020). Strengthening education systems and community engagement. https://www.unicef.org/reports [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. United Nations. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals report 2022. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/. IJSAT- International Journal on Science and Technology, 17(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Valmores, C. P. (2021). School heads’ administrative and leadership skills: Its influence on school performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, 4(3), 21–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Villanueva, A. A., Disu, S. S., & Villanueva, K. F. P. A. (2021). Assessing the school heads leadership in the towns of Nueva Ecija, Philippines: Inter-relationship of supervisory skills, interpersonal skills and leadership skills. Open Access Library Journal, 8(11), 1– 15. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107957 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Virador, G. P. (2023). Practices of school heads in promoting partnership on parental and community involvement. International Journal of Research Publications. https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001241520234922 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Wang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Leadership and stakeholder engagement. Educational Leadership Journal, 18(1), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Weisberg, Y. J., DeYoung, C. G., & Hirsh, J. B. (2022). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. World Bank. (2021). Education and development report. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Gender and health. WHO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study