Proto-Role Semantic Role Labeling for Khmer: A New Approach for Argument Classification

This study examines the applicability of Dowty’s (1991) Proto-role theory to Khmer, a morphologically impoverished and under-resourced language, with the aim of exploring its potential contribution to semantic role labeling (SRL) in languages lacking overt case marking and agreement. Based on a manually annotated dataset of 81 Khmer sentences drawn from literary sources, the study analyzes how Proto-Agent and Proto-Patient entailments are distributed across diverse constructions, including serial verb constructions, passive clauses, psychological predicates, and pro-drop structures.
The findings suggest that Proto-role entailments can provide a flexible and empirically useful framework for argument classification in Khmer, even in the absence of explicit morphosyntactic cues. The study aims to make three limited but targeted contributions: (i) it presents the first systematic Proto-role analysis for Khmer, (ii) it offers empirical observations indicating that Proto-role mappings remain largely stable across complex predicate structures, and (iii) it proposes a pilot annotation strategy that may inform the future development of Khmer semantic role resources for computational applications. While exploratory in scope, these results point to the potential of Proto-role-based SRL as a foundation for semantic annotation in under-resourced languages.

Proto-role theory; semantic role labeling; argument structure; Khmer linguistics; under-resourced languages

1. Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Dixon, R. M. W. (Eds.). (2006). Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baker, M. C. (2003). Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns and adjectives. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Carnie, A. (2013). Syntax: A generative introduction (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dowty, D. R. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/415037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fillmore, C. J., Johnson, C. R., & Petruck, M. R. L. (2003). Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/16.3.235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Haiman, J. (2011). Khmer. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://wals.info [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. He, L., Lee, K., Lewis, M., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2017). Deep semantic role labeling: What works and what’s next. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 473–483). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Huynh, S. (2023). Serial verb constructions in Khmer (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Johansson, R., & Nugues, P. (2008). Dependency-based semantic role labeling of PropBank. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 69–78). Association for Computational Linguistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 109–137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2005). Argument realization. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Palmer, M., Gildea, D., & Kingsbury, P. (2005). The Proposition Bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1), 71–106. https://doi.org/10.1162/0891201053630264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pearson, M. (2013). The syntax and semantics of argument structure in Khmer (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Self, S. (2004). Serial verb constructions in Mon-Khmer languages. Mon-Khmer Studies, 34, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Surdeanu, M., Johansson, R., Meyers, A., Màrquez, L., & Nivre, J. (2007). Combination strategies for semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL (pp. 105–112). Association for Computational Linguistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Thu, Y. K., Ding, C., & Utiyama, M. (2016). A parallel corpus for Asian languages: ALT project. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016) (pp. 1626–1632). European Language Resources Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Williams, A. (2015). Arguments in syntax and semantics. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests