Building Global-Ready Institutions: A Conceptual Framework for Enhancing Internalisation Capacity in Malaysian Higher Education

Authors

Muhammad Fairuz Jamil

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Melaka Kampus Bandaraya, 110 Off Jalan Hang Tuah, 75350 Melaka (Malaysia)

Norhafidzah AB Rahaman

Department of Accounting & Economics, Kolej Profesional MARA Bandar Melaka, 146 Jalan Hang Tuah, 75350 Melaka (Malaysia)

Mastura Roni

Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Melaka Kampus Bandaraya, 110 Off Jalan Hang Tuah, 75350 Melaka (Malaysia)

Wirdawati Ahmad@Mohd Isa

Department of General Studies, Politeknik Tun Syed Nasir Syed Ismail Hab Pendidikan Tinggi Pagoh, Km 1, Jln Panchor, 84600 Pagoh, Muar Johor (Malaysia)

Khadijah Mohd Shahrin

Department of General Studies, Kolej Profesional MARA Ayer Molek, Km 16, Jln Ayer Molek / Tiang Dua, 75460 Ayer Molek, Melaka (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500363

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 5469-5477

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-10

Accepted: 2026-05-16

Published: 2026-06-02

Abstract

Internationalising higher education is a strategic goal for Malaysia in its pursuit of becoming a global education hub. However, internal capacity constraints within Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) hinder these efforts. This conceptual paper presents a framework to help the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) strengthens institutional capacity for sustainable global engagement. Grounded in the Resource-Based View, Organisational Learning Theory, and Institutional Theory, the framework outlines key capacity domains of human resources, infrastructure, governance, culture, and finance needed to develop “global-ready” institutions. It emphasises strategic processes such as diagnostics, professional development, policy alignment, peer learning, and continuous feedback. Strengthening these internal factors will enhance international student recruitment, research collaboration, and global rankings, supporting Malaysia’s higher education aspirations. This study offers practical insights for policymakers and institutional leaders aiming to improve internationalisation outcomes.

Keywords

Internalisation, Higher Education Institutions (HEIs)

Downloads

References

1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reis, (77/78), 345-348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barney, J. B., & Arikan, A. M. (2005). The resource‐based view: origins and implications. The Blackwell handbook of strategic management, 123-182. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brewer, E., & Leask, B. (2023). Internationalizing the curriculum, teaching, and learning. In The handbook of international higher education (pp. 242-264). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organisational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of management review, 24(3), 522-537. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. de Wit, H., & Hunter, F. (2015). Understanding internationalization of higher education in the European context. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(2), 99–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hassan, R., Masek, A., & Mohamad, M. M. (2015). The role of networking and internationalization of technical universities in academic staff competence development. TVET@ Asia, 5, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Knight, J. (2012). Concepts, rationales, and interpretive frameworks in the internationalization of higher education. The SAGE handbook of international higher education, 27-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organization science, 12(5), 632-657. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Malaysia, K. P. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Munusamy, M. M., & Hashim, A. (2019). Internationalisation of higher education in Malaysia: Insights from higher education administrators. AEI Insights, 5(1), 21-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Othman, I. W., Mohd Kamal, N. H. I., Abdul Hamid, A. B., & Yusoff, M. S. (2018). The Internationalization of Malaysian Public Higher Education Institution: A Study of Academic Expatriate Experiences. Labuan e-Journal of Muamalat and Society, 12(2018), 129-138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tham, S. Y. (2013). Internationalizing higher education in Malaysia: Government policies and university’s response. Journal of Studies in International Education, 17(5), 648-662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wan, C. D., & Abdullah, D. (2021). Internationalisation of Malaysian higher education: policies, practices and the SDGs. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 23(3), 212-226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles