From Legal Gaps to Strategic Assets the Impact of Service Mark Recognition on the Growth of Mining Support SMEs in Zambia

This study investigates the economic impact of the Trade Marks Act No. 11 of 2023 on the growth of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) within Zambia’s mining support sector. For 67 years, the previous 1958 legislative framework excluded service marks, creating an institutional void that hindered local firms from formalizing brand equity. Grounded in Institutional Theory and the Resource-Based View (RBV), the research employed a mixed-methods approach, analyzing primary data from 160 SMEs across the Copperbelt and North-Western provinces.
Quantitative results from OLS regression analysis (R^2 = 0.986) reveal that Service Mark Registration is a highly significant predictor of turnover growth (beta = 5.288, p < 0.001), effectively transforming "vulnerable intangibles" into protected VRIN assets. The study identifies a potent "North-Western Effect," where regional institutional maturity significantly moderates growth (beta = 4.614, p < 0.001), suggesting that modern multinational mining environments accelerate the benefits of IP formalization. Furthermore, a strong correlation between Local Content Compliance and turnover (r = 0.960) indicates a synergistic relationship between brand protection and legislative local participation.
Qualitative findings highlight an "Institutional Literacy Gap," where despite the new legal machinery, many SMEs remain unaware of the Madrid Protocol’s domestication. The study concludes that the 2023 Act has effectively "unlocked" the growth potential of service-based SMEs by providing a standardized signaling mechanism for quality and legitimacy. It recommends that the Patents and Companies Registration Agency (PACRA) and the Ministry of SME Development integrate IP registration into local content certification to sustain this growth trajectory through 2030.

Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM), Service Marks, Intellectual Property Law, SME Growth, Mining Support Services.

1. Adams & Adams. (2024). Zambia passes new Trade Marks Act (Act No. 11 of 2023). https://www.adams.africa/adams-news/zambia-passes-new-trade-marks-act-act-no-11-of-2023/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Association of Mine Suppliers and Contractors [AMSC]. (2025, December). Empowering SMEs through promotion of equity in business opportunities [Conference session]. Association Conference Proceedings, Lusaka, Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bayuo, J. (2025). Intellectual property rights and SME internationalization in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from the mining value chain. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 16(2), 210–234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bowmans. (2026, January 14). Zambia: A new era for trademark registration and protection. https://bowmanslaw.com/insights/zambia-a-new-era-for-trademark-registration-and-protection/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Casson, M. (2021). The theory of the firm: Global supply chains and institutional legitimacy (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chileshe, M. (2023). Local content and SME growth: Integrating legal frameworks in the Zambian mining sector. University of Zambia Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fessehaie, J., & Morris, M. (2023). Value chain dynamics and local content in African mining: A critique of the Resource-Based View. Journal of African Business, 24(1), 12–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development [IGF]. (2025). Resource-based industrialization: Unlocking growth through IP reform. IISD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lungu, J., & Phiri, C. (2024). Beyond physical assets: The role of service marks in scaling Zambian engineering SMEs. Zambia Journal of Business and Economic Research, 8(1), 45–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mohammad, C., & Phiri, L. (2025). An overview of Zambia's intellectual property regime: Key issues and developments. Open Access Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, 2(1), 10–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mumba, K. (2024). IP literacy and the SME: A study of the Copperbelt and North-Western clusters. Copperbelt University Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mwila, N. K. (2025). The institutional bridge: Why North-Western Province SMEs are leading the IP revolution in Zambia. Journal of Emerging Market Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Patents and Companies Registration Agency [PACRA]. (2025, December 30). Notice on the operationalisation of the Trade Marks Act No. 11 of 2023. https://www.pacra.org.zm/notices/12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Peng, M. W. (2022). Global business (5th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sampa, P., & Hossain, S. (2024). Innovation and intellectual property rights: A case study of Zambia. Middle East Research Journal of Economics and Management, 4(6), 186–194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sheth, J. N. (2020). Borderless world: Post-pandemic growth strategies for SMEs in emerging markets. International Business Review, 29(6), 101–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sinyangwe, A., Mwiya, B., & Lungu, J. (2024). Effects of regulatory environment on the performance of small-scale mining enterprises: Evidence from Zambia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(9), 3429–3446. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8090254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Spoor & Fisher. (2025). Zambia’s Trademarks Act 2023: Practical implications for the extractive industries. Spoor & Fisher IP Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sun, Y., Chen, J., & Mei, L. (2024). Is the resource-based view still strategic? A critical reassessment in the era of digital transformation. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0537.v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Teece, D. J. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and the intellectual property regime: Managing intangibles in global value chains. California Management Review, 65(2), 23–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. World Intellectual Property Organization [WIPO]. (2026). World Intellectual Property Report: Intellectual property and mining innovations in developing nations. WIPO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Generative AI in the Workplace: A Systematic Review of Productivity Effects, Employment Perceptions, and Job Insecurity
• Gregg Shorthand Writing: Self-Knowledge, Proficiency Level and Academic Performance among Bachelor of Science in Office Administration Students
• Research on Team Contribution Quantification Model Based on Multi-dimensional Anonymous Mutual Evaluation and Shapley Value
• Bridging Employer Branding and Talent Management: A Transformational Leadership Perspective from the Manufacturing Industry
• Factors Influencing Non-Muslims’ Intention to Adopt Islamic Home Financing