Exploring Gen Y Lecturers' Strategies for Enhancing Student Engagement and Participation in Hybrid Learning Environments

This study explores the strategies employed by Generation Y (Gen Y) lecturers to enhance student engagement and participation in hybrid learning environments at Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia. Hybrid learning, which combines face-to-face and online instructional approaches, has become an increasingly important mode of delivery in higher education due to its flexibility and potential to support diverse student needs. However, maintaining student engagement and active participation in hybrid settings remains a significant challenge for educators. This study adopted a qualitative research design using a phenomenological approach to gain an in-depth understanding of the lived experiences of Gen Y lecturers who actively implement hybrid teaching practices. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with six purposively selected lecturers from UiTM campuses in Johor and Melaka, each with at least five years of experience in conducting hybrid classes. The interview data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed seven key themes that represent the strategies used by Gen Y lecturers to promote student engagement and participation: blended teaching approach, use of interactive and gamified tools, active and collaborative learning, clear communication and structure, real-time participation and feedback, motivation and recognition, and monitoring and tracking. The results indicate that Gen Y lecturers are highly adaptable, technologically proficient, and student-centered in their instructional practices. They intentionally integrate synchronous and asynchronous learning activities, employ digital tools such as Kahoot, Padlet, and Google Classroom, and use rewards and participation-based monitoring to sustain student involvement. Despite challenges related to workload, digital readiness, and inconsistent student participation, Gen Y lecturers play a vital role in advancing effective hybrid learning practices. The study offers practical implications for institutional policy, professional development, and the continuous improvement of hybrid teaching and learning in Malaysian higher education.

Hybrid learning, student engagement, student participation, Gen-Y lecturer, higher education

1. Ab Ghani, S. M., Lim, T. W., Mustaza, T. A., & Abu Hassan, M. I. (2015). Engaging the millennial generation student with e-learning in dentistry. International Journal of e-Learning and Higher Education (IJELHE), 4(7), 113-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adi Badiozaman, I. F., Ng, A., & Mung Ling, V. (2025). “Here we go again”: unfolding HE students’ hybrid experience and resilience during post-covid times. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(3), 920–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2238324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alammary, A. (2019). Blended learning models for introductory programming courses: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 14(9), e0221765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221765. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Abdirahman Abdi Ali, AlQarni, K., Hamzah Faleh Migdadi, Aldosemani, T. I., & Shadi Majed Alshraah. (2024). Addressing the Challenge of Hybrid Learning Environment in Foreign Language Education: Training Lecturers for Blended Teaching Approaches. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(5), 1582–1594. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1405.32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alkaabi, A. M., Qablan, A., Alkatheeri, F., Rashid, A., Maha Alawlaki, Alameri, L., & Bushra Malhem. (2023). Experiences of university teachers with rotational blended learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative case study. PLOS ONE, 18(10), e0292796–e0292796. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292796. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Anis. (2023). Hybrid Learning in Malaysian Universities. Easyuni.my; EasyUni. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. https://www.easyuni.my/advice/hybrid-learning-in-malaysian-universities-3010/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bustamante, J. C., Segura-Berges, M., Lizalde-Gil, M., & Peñarrubia-Lozano, C. (2022). Qualitative Analyses of e-Learning Implementation and Hybrid Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic at Spanish Universities. Sustainability, 14(19), 12003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Eliveria, A., Serami, L., Famorca, L., & Cruz, J. D. (2019). Investigating students’ engagement in a hybrid learning environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 482, 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/482/1/012011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gudoniene, D., Staneviciene, E., Huet, I., Dickel, J., Dieng, D., Degroote, J., Rocio, V., Butkiene, R., & Casanova, D. (2025). Hybrid Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 17(2), 756–756. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020756 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hamid, N. R. J., Rahman, N. M. A., Wello, N. M. B., & Asrifan, N. A. (2025). Lecturers’perception of hybrid learning model in teaching English for Business. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.32996/jetal.2025.7.1.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jaya, F., & Nurqamarani, A. S. (2023). Understanding student engagement in hybrid learning: An analysis impact digital literacy and academic self-efficacy. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 9(3), 833-845.http://dx.doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i3.7947 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kazu, I. Y., & Yalçin, C. K. (2022). Investigation of the Effectiveness of Hybrid Learning on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.79.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lakhal, S., Mukamurera, J., Bédard, M., Heilporn, G., & Chauret, M. (2021). Students and instructors perspective on blended synchronous learning in a Canadian graduate program. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1383–1396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12578. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Li, K. C., Wong, B. T. M., Kwan, R., Chan, H. T., Wu, M. M. F., & Cheung, S. K. S. (2023). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Evaluation of Hybrid Learning and Teaching Practices: The Perspective of Academics. Sustainability, 15(8), 6780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086780 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mellita, D., & Ayu Lestari. (2023). The Difference in Perceptions of Hybrid Work Environment Between Generation X and Generation Y Educators in Private Higher Education Post-Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 23(2), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v23i2.60222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ali, M. N. M., Zainodin, W. H. W., & Mahamad, T. E. T. (2024). The challenges of digital inequalities in online and remote learning on B40 students during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Journal of Media and Information Warfare, 17(1), 1-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mushtaq, Dr. M., & Iqbal, Z. (2024). Hybrid Pedagogies: Assessing the Effectiveness of Blended and Flipped Learning in Digital Learning Environments. International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies, 03(09), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-03-09-034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mustapha, Y., Hilmi, M., Mansor, S., & Saad, S. (2022). Prospect and Challenges of Blended Learning in Malaysia: A systematic literature review. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.55057/ajress.2022.4.3.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). Face-To-Face, Online and Hybrid Education: University Students’ Opinions and Preferences. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 2(2), ep2206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/12384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144(1), 103701. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Saadé, R. G., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Liu, H., & Guan, H. (2023). Challenges and opportunities in the internet of intelligence of things in higher education—Towards bridging theory and practice. IoT, 4(3), 430-465. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot4030019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sareen, S., & Mandal, S. (2024). Challenges of blended learning in higher education across global north-south: A systematic and integrative literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Shah, M. a. M. M., Dollah, A. D. M. @., Basri, S. A., Majid, R. A., & Abu, N. A. (2023). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Enhancing blended learning as effective teaching methodology for UITM Accounting undergraduates. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i11/19754 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tan, C. S., Zakuan, N., & Aziz, M. I. A. (2022a). Recent trends of blended learning and flipped classroom in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal, 2, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid2.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Van der Rijst, R., Guo, P., & Admiraal, W. (2023). Student engagement in hybrid approaches to teaching in higher education. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 41(2), 315-336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.562521. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Wikipedia contributors. (2025, July 16). Generation Alpha. Wikipedia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Alpha#/media/File:Generation_timeline.svg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study