Temporal Analysis on Verb Tense, Narrative Viewpoint, Immediacy Perception, and Character Identification in Literary Reading

Literary works as artefacts reflect the times and social context in which they are produced. Actively reading literature, questioning the texts, and identifying themes are the cornerstone of literary education and critical thinking. This study dwells into a comprehensive exploration of how verb tense and narrative perspective correlate with readers’ sense of immediacy and character identity in Contemporary Literature. Through an adapted evaluation tool, the stories’ perceptive impact and relatability will be measured under a nonexperimental descriptive research design. Selected SHS students from Colegio de San Juan de Letran were given a literary selection (transposed to multiple versions with varying verb tenses and narrative viewpoints) and an adapted rating tool administered post-reading. Since the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality revealed that the data are not normally distributed, Mann–Whitney U tests were conducted to investigate the differences in literary perceptions by tense and point of view. Findings showed that there were no significant differences in respondents’ immediacy perception and character identification between narratives written in the past tense and narratives written in the present tense since both p-values are more than 0.05 level of significance. This indicates that readers perceive the time of a selection regardless of verb tense used and relate or not to the characters regardless of the story’s narrative viewpoint. Contemporary Literature teachers and authors of literary works may then emphasize less the impact of verb tense and narrative viewpoint in both teaching and writing literature.

Verb Tenses, Narrative Viewpoint, Immediacy Perception, Character Identification, Literature

1. Abdulrraziq, N.M.A. & Geedallah, A.E.M. (2021). Narratological analysis of temporality in novel. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 9(4), 38-44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aprecia, N. A. B., Barrera, G. A., Cuares, K. R. A., Cuison, M. J. L., Lazaro, M. K. D., Pat-i, K. K. M., & Sayson, Y. J. H. (2022). A Descriptive Correlational Study on the Physical Environment and Perceived Academic Performance of STEM Online Learners. Animo Repository, De La Salle University. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1178&context=conf_shsrescon [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aribjonov, M. U. o‘g‘li. (n.d.). Expressing emotions in literature. XXI-Asrning Ilmiy-Amaliy Tadqiqotlari, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Busselle, R. & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: a model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cape, A., & Subillaga, R. (2025). Integrated grammar approach in teaching Philippine literature and academic performance of MATATAG learners. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 39(1). https://www.ejournals.ph/article.php?id=28097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cherry, K. (2024, January 16). The recency effect in psychology. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/the-recency-effect-4685058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Education. (2025). The strengthened senior high school program shaping paper. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/SHAPE-PAPER-BCD-a_o-May-22.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Doecke, B. (2016). Professional learning? English in Australia, 51(1), 9–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Erniwati, S.R. & Mertosono, M. (2023, August 28). Reading comprehension and literary appreciation: an analysis of students difficulties. INTERFERENCE: Journal of Language, Literature, and Linguistics, 4(2), 254-263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Green, M.C. & Brock, T.C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701-721. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hall-Wilson, L. (2019, December 12). How to write with immediacy in fiction. Lisa Hall-Wilson. https://lisahallwilson.com/how-to-write-with-immediacy-in-fiction/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Makenzie, A. (2024). The fluidity of time: Analyzing temporal dynamics in literary works. European International Journal of Philological Sciences, 4(07), 1–4. https://www.eipublication.com/index.php/eijps/article/view/1989/1853 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nasir, A. (2020, July 31). How to engage your readers’ emotions. https://writingcooperative.com/how-to-engage-your-readers-emotions-9912b8941a50 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Paton, C. (2026, March 29). How authors control the reader’s emotions. https://medium.com/the-reading-lab/how-authors-control-the-readers-emotions-89c5aac140d3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Perry, J.O. (1965, July 1). The temporal analysis of poems. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 5(3), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/5.3.227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Reilly, S. (n.d.). Writing narration in the future tense. https://sebreilly.com/essays/writing-narration-in-the-future-tense/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Risko, A. (2024, May 21). Teaching grammar within the context of Literature. https://www.grammarflip.com/blog/teaching-grammar-within-the-context-of-literature/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rueda, R.B. (2026, January 14). Literary reading orientation toward classic and contemporary texts and its relationship to language proficiency and interpretive competence among BA English Language Studies students: A quantitative correlational study. International Journal Of Research And Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), 12(12), 1225-1230. https://dx.doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12120106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Salmons, J. (2023, February 3). Quantitative research with nonexperimental designs. https://researchmethodscommunity.sagepub.com/blog/quantitative-research-with-non-experimental-designs [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sheraliyevna, S. N. (2024). The importance of grammar in the study of English literature. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Development, 25, 138-141. http://www.ajird.journalspark.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Studies on time: Time in literature. (1991). Intercontinental Academia. http://intercontinental-academia.ubias.net/nagoya/docs/references/studies-on-time-1/studies-on-time-time-in-literature [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tao, W. (2023). Navigating narratives: The impact of social issues on literature. The Journal of International Social Research, 16(107), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2023.123368 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Truong, T. M. V. (2009). The relevance of literary analysis to teaching literature in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 47(3), 2–9, 17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Weber, A. (2018). Teaching grammar through literature in foreign language learning with German as an example. Per Linguam: A Journal for Language Learning, 34(1), 78–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.5785/34-1-826 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests