Interactive Shadow Puppetry as A Creative Approach in Teaching: A Qualitative Intrinsic Case Study on Excellent Moral Education Teachers

The effective inculcation of moral values remains a persistent challenge in Malaysian secondary schools, as Moral Education instruction often textbook centred and teacher directed approaches that limit students’ engagement and internalisation of values. In line with national aspirations for holistic and values-driven education, there is a growing need to explore creative pedagogical practices that meaningfully connect moral concepts with students lived experiences. This qualitative study examines the use of Shadow Puppetry as a creative and interactive pedagogical approach to impart values embedded in the Moral Education textbook. Drawing on semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and teachers’ journal writings, the study employs thematic analysis to explore participants’ experiences. This article reports findings from a larger qualitative inquiry, focusing specifically on one overarching theme creative interactive pedagogy, with emphasis on the subtheme Shadow Puppetry as a medium for value internalisation. The findings indicate that Shadow Puppetry promotes active participation, emotional engagement, collaborative learning, and contextual understanding of moral values. The study highlights the pedagogical potential of culturally grounded creative arts in strengthening Moral Education practices and contributes to ongoing discussions on innovative, student centred approaches to values education in Malaysia.

Creative Approach, Interactive, Shadow Puppetry, Moral Education

1. Baer, J. (2016). Creativity doesn’t develop in a vacuum. Psychology Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Structured uncertainty: How creativity thrives under constraints and uncertainty. Review of General Psychology, 23(3), 291–297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Beltz, J., & Eva von Reumont. (2023). Leaving Javanese Shadow Theatre (Wayang Kulit) Religiously Unlabelled. Entangled Religions, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.46586/er.13.2023.11038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chang, L. H. (2018). Moral values in Malaysian education: Issues and challenges. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 8(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dewey, J. (2021). Experience and education. Macmillan. (Original work published 1938) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Eisner, E. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Merrill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fu, Q., & Hu, Q. (2022). Study of Chinese Shadow Mapping Classification with the Application of Deep Learning Algorithms. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7050260 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Güleç, Y. (2024). Karagoz shadow plays as an artistic-pedagogical tool in teaching Islam. British Journal of Religious Education, 46(2), 165-179. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hashim, R., & Zulkifli, H. (2019). Moral reasoning through Hikmah pedagogy in Moral Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 788–800. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hashim, R., & Mohd Yusoff, Z. (2022). Pedagogical content knowledge among Moral Education teachers in promoting students’ ethical understanding. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 55–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2019). The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kaur, S. (2015). Moral values in education. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Socia Science, 20(3), 21-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Pendidikan Moral KSSR, Tahun 5. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum: Putrajaya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lovat, T., Toomey, R., & Clement, N. (2011). International research handbook on value education and student wellbeing. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mailis, M. I., & Mansor, R. (2025). Teachers’ pedagogical transformation towards 21st century learning in enhancing students’ thinking skills. Pedagogia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 17(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.55215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Md Aroff, A. R. (2014). Values education and the Malaysia Education Blueprint. Journal for Interdisciplinary Research in Education, 4(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Merriam, S.B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025. Putrajaya: MOE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2025). Rancangan Pendidikan Malaysia 2026–2035. Putrajaya: KPM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mokhtar, M.M.H., Yasin, M., & Mokhtar, M.M. (2024). Pembentukan karakter murid melalui penggunaan buku teks Pendidikan Moral Tingkatan 4 dalam proses pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan (pdpc). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(12), 2930-2942. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Norzihani, S., Rahim, M., & Ahmad, A. (2021). Narrative approaches in Moral Education lassrooms. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nucci, L., Narvaez, D., & Krettenauer, T. (2014). Handbook of moral and character education (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Robinson, V. (2011). Student-centered leadership. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Solumuthu, M., Mailis, M., & Mansor, A. N. (2023). Teaching practices and higher-order thinking in Moral Education. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(3), 112–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Thambu, N. (2019a). Potensi unsur-unsur Teater Forum dalam pembentukan insan menyeluruh: Dapatan kajian kualitatif kelas Pendidikan Moral. Muallim Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3(1), 77-95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Thambu, N. (2024). Kompetensi dan Kekangan Guru Novis Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Moral di Sekolah Menengah. Asian Pendidikan, 4(1),23-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Thambu, N. (2025). Wayang kulit interaktif dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Moral: Satu Inovasi. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Thambu, N., Othman, M. K. H., & Naidu, N. B. M. (2020). Using forum theatre to develop various levels of thinking skills among Moral Education students in secondary school. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.2.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zakaria, N., & Abdul Rahman, N. F. (2021). Culturally responsive pedagogy in Malaysian classrooms: Enhancing meaningful learning through cultural integration. Journal of Education and Learning, 15(3), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study