Instructional Practice and Self-Efficacy among Elementary School Teachers in Marilog District
Authors
Rizal Memorial Colleges, Inc. Davao City (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500550
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 8189-8208
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-28
Accepted: 2026-06-02
Published: 2026-06-05
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between instructional practices and self-efficacy among elementary school teachers in Marilog District. It aimed to determine how everyday classroom practices influence teachers’ professional confidence, particularly in remote and geographically challenged contexts, and to identify which instructional domains most strongly support teachers’ belief in their capability to plan lessons, engage learners, and manage inclusive classrooms. A quantitative descriptive-correlational design was employed, focusing on instructional practices in planning and preparation, instructional delivery and strategies, assessment for learning and feedback, and learning environment and classroom management. Self-efficacy was measured in instructional design and differentiation, delivery and learner engagement, and classroom management and inclusive climate. Data analysis revealed that both instructional practices and self-efficacy were generally manifested at moderate levels, indicating that teachers demonstrated essential classroom competencies but required sustained support in selected areas. A meaningful positive relationship between instructional practices and self-efficacy was identified, suggesting that stronger classroom practices were associated with higher teacher confidence. The findings highlight the importance of data-driven technical assistance, targeted coaching, and responsive Learning Action Cell sessions to enhance instructional quality and teacher efficacy in Marilog District, Davao City.
Keywords
Instructional Practices, Self-Efficacy, Elementary School Teachers, Marilog District, Teacher Development, Instructional Supervision
Downloads
References
1. Aldabbagh, R., Barnes-Holmes, D., Cullen, C., Holloway, J., Keenan, M., O’Connor, L., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2024). Systematic review and meta-analysis of teacher interventions for children with externalizing behaviors. Education and Treatment of Children, 47(2), 73–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-022-09491-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Antonio, D. C., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Effect of inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills: A meta-analysis. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(1), Article 11538. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Barbieri, C. A., Miller-Cotto, D., Clerjuste, S. N., & Chawla, K. (2023). A meta-analysis of the worked examples effect on mathematics performance. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09745-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bego, C. R., Juliano, M., & Man, C. (2024). Single-paper meta-analyses of the effects of spaced retrieval practice in STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00468-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Boke, B., Yildirim, M., & Hastie, P. (2025). Effects of cooperative learning on student outcomes in physical education: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1508808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508808 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2023). Empirical research on teacher competence in mathematics lesson planning: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00443-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. The Danielson Group. https://danielsongroup.org/resources/framework-for-teaching [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Duan, S., Bissaker, K., & Xu, Z. (2024). Correlates of teachers’ classroom management self-efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09881-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Erdem, C., Karagoz, S., & Arastaman, G. (2024). The relationship between school and classroom climate and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. School Psychology International. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343231202923 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Eren, E., & Topcu, M. S. (2025). Teacher student-specific self-efficacy and its impact on students’ perceptions of inclusion. Teaching and Teacher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.104713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Evans, P., Vansteenkiste, M., Parker, P. D., et al. (2024). Cognitive load theory and its relationships with motivation: A review and agenda. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Falcon, S., Almasri, N. A., & Fraser, B. J. (2023). Teachers’ engaging messages, enthusiasm, and students’ performance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 126, Article 104005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ialuna, F., Civitillo, S., & Jugert, P. (2024). Culturally responsive teaching, teacher–student relationship, and school belongingness: A multi-informant study in ethnically diverse classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 47, Article 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100839 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Jerrim, J. (2025). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional practice, and student achievement: Testing direct and indirect pathways. American Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312241300265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kalinowski, E., Gralla, S., & Praetorius, A.-K. (2024). The essential role of instructional self-efficacy and enthusiasm for differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104572 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Karakose, T., Kardas, A., Kanadlı, S., Tülübaş, T., & Yildirim, B. (2024). How collective efficacy mediates the association between principal instructional leadership and instructional self-efficacy: Findings from a meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) study. Behavioral Sciences, 14(2), Article 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14020085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kerimoğlu, E., & Altun, S. (2024). Backward design in pre-service teacher education to enhance curriculum knowledge. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 18(2), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v18i2.8625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Lynch, K., Gonzalez, K. E., Hill, H. C., & Merritt, R. (2025). A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence linking mathematics and science professional development to teacher knowledge, classroom instruction, and student achievement. AERA Open, 11, Article 23328584251335302. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251335302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mammadov, S., et al. (2024). A meta-analytic review of personality and teacher–student relationships. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000882 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Nieminen, J. H., & Carless, D. (2022). Feedback literacy: A critical review of an emerging concept. Higher Education, 85(6), 1267–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00895-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Alqassab, M. (2023). Effects of rubrics on academic performance, self-regulated learning, and self-efficacy: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 35, Article 98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09823-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Patall, E. A., Yates, N., Lee, J., et al. (2023). A meta-analysis of teachers’ provision of structure and students’ engagement, competence beliefs, and achievement. Educational Psychologist, 58(4), 225–255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Pozas, M., Letzel, V., Lindner, K.-T., & Schwab, S. (2021). DI (Differentiated Instruction) does matter! Effects on students’ well-being, social inclusion, and academic self-concept. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 729027. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.729027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Qun, Y., Gao, X., & Li, J. (2025). Investigating the impact of immediate vs. delayed feedback timing on EFL learners. Journal of Second Language Writing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Ryan, A. T. (2024). Timing’s not everything: Immediate and delayed feedback are both value-laden. Medical Education, 58(7), 686–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Shanahan, E., Choi, S., An, J., Casey-Wilke, B., Birinci, S., Roberts, C., & Reno, E. (2024). Ongoing teacher support for data-based individualization: A meta-analysis and synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194241271335 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O’Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Goodrich, J., Van Herwegen, J., & Anders, J. (2023). Effective teacher professional development: New theory and a meta-analytic test. Review of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231217480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Sweller, J. (2024). Why explicit instruction benefits human learning: A response to de Jong, Klahr, and Lazonder. Educational Psychology Review. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Tao, Y., & Chen, G. (2024). The relationship between teacher talk and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 43, Article 100549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100549 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Tondok, M., Mudde, A., Sluiter, R., & Bolderdijk, J. W. (2024). Building bridges in diverse societies: A meta-analysis of field experimental cooperative-learning studies. Societies, 14(11), Article 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14110221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study