Correlating Instructional Effectiveness and Community Involvement of Public Secondary Teachers
Authors
Capiz Srate University – Pontevedra Campus (Philippines)
Capiz Srate University – Pontevedra Campus (Philippines)
Capiz Srate University – Pontevedra Campus (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500603
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 8975-8987
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-28
Accepted: 2026-06-03
Published: 2026-06-09
Abstract
This study explored instructional effectiveness and community involvement among public secondary school teachers, and examined differences across demographic profiles. It also analyzed the relationships among these professional domains to provide a holistic view of their interconnectedness. Using descriptive-associational design, 220 teachers were randomly selected from 510 in the one of the divisions in Western Visayas during the 2025–2026 school year. Findings revealed very high instructional effectiveness across domains, and strong community involvement, with communication rated highest. Instructional effectiveness and community involvement did not significantly differ by demographic variables. Correlation analysis showed a strong positive, highly significant relationship between instructional effectiveness and community involvement. These results highlight that strengthening one domain enhances the others, underscoring the importance of integrated professional development programs that simultaneously advance teaching effectiveness and community engagement among public secondary school teachers.
Keywords
teaching competence, societal involvement, research capability
Downloads
References
1. Asis, J.M.N, Caballes, D.G, & Ortiz, O.E. (2023). Instructional competence of public secondary school teachers in the district of Naic: Basis for instructional enhancement program. Polaris Global Journal of Scholarly Research and Trends, 2(1), 38-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Assante, G., & Momanu, M. (2021). Community Engagement in Schools: A Grounded Theory to Understand In-Service Teachers’ Practices. Proceedings of CBU in Social Sciences, 2, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.12955/pss.v2.196 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Basa, C. B. (2025). Teaching and Research Competence of Teachers: Implications to Educational Policy. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(VII), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90700053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Danielson, C. (2015). Framing discussions about teaching. Educational Leadership, 72(7), 38–41. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1062906 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Department of Education. (2017). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Eden, C. A., Chisom, O. N., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Parent and community involvement in education: Strengthening partnerships for social improvement. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(3), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i3.894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Epstein, J. (2019). Epstein’s Framework of Six Types of Involvement (Including: Sample Practices, Challenges, Redefinitions, and Expected Results). https://familyvoices.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Sect.0_Slide-006A.-Framework_of_Six_Types_of_Involvement.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, Family, and Community Partnerships. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494673 (Original work published 2011) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Escanda, M. (2025). Research-based instructional strategies, professional competence, and pedagogical approaches. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.54476/ioer-imrj/636674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Frias, H. S., Pepito, M. R., Diaz, W. D., Miñosa, K., & Co, M. (2025). The impact of community extension programs on faculty instruction and research competency at the University of Cebu - Main Campus. International Journal of Research, 12(3), 505–538. https://ijrjournal.com/index.php/ijr/article/view/1768?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Jacobson, R., & Blank, M. (2015). A Framework for More and Better Learning through Community School. https://communityschools.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/11/Better-Learning-through-Community-School-Partnerships1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Levin, B. (2018). How research influences education policy and practice. Educational Researcher, 47(5), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18761314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Li, D., Li, Y., Zheng, Z., Zhou, X., Castro, D., Vermund, S., & Brault, M. (2024). A proposal of utilizing six types of involvement model to guide kindergarten to 12th grade school parental communication and support during a pandemic. Medical Research Archives, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i4.5178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Llego, M. A. (2024, August 10). Advancing Education Through Research: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Basic Education Research Fund (BERF) for DepEd Personnel. TeacherPH. https://www.teacherph.com/deped-basic-education-research-fund-berf-guidelines-impact-philippine-education/?utm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Malunes, R. E., & Dioso, D. P. D. (2020). Teaching competence of public school teachers in the light of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. Philippine Social Science Journal, 3(2), 43–44. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v3i2.179 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Mensah, E. K., Saayir, P. T., & Kwao Tettey, R. (2025). The nexus between instructional competence of teachers and students’ academic performance: a survey on senior high school accounting teachers. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2476287 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Oredina, N. A., & Ebueza, R. D. (2020). Teachers’ competence and students’ academic performance in mathematics: A brief cross-sectional case in Don Mariano Marcos Memorial State University, Philippines. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12A), 7766–7774. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082564 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ormilla, R. C. G. (2025). Bridging the Gap: A qualitative analysis of the Philippine Professional Standards for teachers and teaching internship experiences of practice teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(9), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.9.25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Pandey, U. C., & Smriti Gargava. (2019). Community participation in open and distance learning systems in India. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 86–97. https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/426? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. (2026.). https://tec.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Philippine-Professional-Standards-for-Teachers.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Seraspe, K. R. (2022). The correlation of teaching behavior and educational competence of public elementary school teachers. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 3(2), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v3i2.58 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Tan Cortes, S., Pineda, H. A., & Geverola, I. J. R. (2021). Examining competence in action research of basic education teachers in Cebu City, Philippines. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 6(2), 202–230. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol6iss2pp202-230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. The Role of Community Partners in Education for 2025 | Education World. (2025). Educationworld.com. https://www.educationworld.com/teachers/role-community-partners-education-2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Ulla, M. (2018). Benefits and challenges of doing research: Experiences from Philippine public school teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 28(3). https://www.iier.org.au/iier28/ulla.pdf? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15(2), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Wallin, D., Young, J., & Levin, B. (2021, August 15). 8.5 A Typology of Parent/Caregiver and Family Involvement. Understanding Canadian Schools: An Introduction to Educational Administration (6th Edition); University of Saskatchewan Open Press. https://www.saskoer.ca/understandingcanadianschools/chapter/8-5-a-typology-of-parent-caregiver-and-family-involvement/? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Wallwork, A. (2016). English for Academic Correspondence. Cham Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study