Experiential Competitiveness in Heritage Tourism: A Conceptual Review

The post-pandemic tourism environment has intensified competition among destinations and transformed the factors that influence tourism success. While traditional tourism competitiveness has often been evaluated through visitor arrivals, tourism receipts, and market share, contemporary tourists increasingly prioritise meaningful, authentic, and satisfying experiences. Consequently, heritage tourism destinations must shift from attraction-based competition towards experience-centred strategies that encourage long-term visitor loyalty and revisit behaviour. This article presents a conceptual review of experiential destination competitiveness within the context of heritage tourism in Penang, Malaysia. Drawing upon Destination Image Theory (DIT) and Expectation Confirmation Theory (ECT), the article examines how gastronomy experience, cultural heritage, service quality, and destination image contribute to tourist revisit intention through the mediating role of tourist satisfaction. Through a synthesis of tourism literature and empirical evidence, the study argues that experiential competitiveness is fundamentally a satisfaction-driven process in which integrated destination experiences influence behavioural outcomes. The article proposes an Experiential Destination Competitiveness Framework that positions tourist satisfaction as the central mechanism linking destination experiences to revisit intention. The findings highlight the importance of experience integration, expectation fulfilment, and visitor retention as strategic priorities for heritage tourism destinations. The study contributes to tourism literature by extending destination competitiveness research beyond traditional economic indicators and offers practical insights for destination managers and policymakers seeking to strengthen long-term competitiveness in increasingly demanding tourism markets.

Experiential competitiveness; Heritage tourism; Tourist satisfaction; Revisit intention; Destination image; Gastronomy experience; Penang

1. Abdou, A. H., Mohamed, S. A. K., Khalil, A. A. F., Albakhit, A. I., & Alarjani, A. J. N. (2022). Modeling the relationship between perceived service quality, tourist satisfaction, and tourists’ behavioral intentions amid COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from yoga tourists. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1003650. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1003650 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baker, D. A., & Crompton, J. L. (2000). Quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3), 785–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00108-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Beerli, A., & Martín, J. D. (2004). Factors influencing destination image. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(3), 657–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.01.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bitušíková, A. (2021). Cultural heritage as a means of heritage tourism development. Muzeológia a Kultúrne Dedičstvo, 9(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.46284/mkd.2021.9.1.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, C.-F., & Chen, F.-S. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism Management, 31(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.01.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dorokhov, O., Malyarets, L., Ukrainski, K., Petrova, M., Yevstrat, D., & Aliyeva, A. (2023). Consumer expectations and real experiences: Case of Ukrainian tourists in Turkey. Access Journal, 4(1), 102–114. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/449802 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ferdhaus, M., Ab Dulhamid, H., & Ali, M. A. F. (2023). George Town, Penang, as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. e-BANGI, 20(4), 220–228. https://ejournal.ukm.my/ebangi/article/view/63889 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hamid, A. H. A., Mohamad, M. R., & Suki, N. M. (2021). Tourists’ revisit intention to UNESCO World Heritage Sites. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 27(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766720927761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kivela, J., & Crotts, J. C. (2006). Tourism and gastronomy: Gastronomy’s influence on how tourists experience a destination. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 30(3), 354–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348006286797 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kolar, T., & Žabkar, V. (2010). A consumer-based model of authenticity: An oxymoron or the foundation of cultural heritage marketing? Tourism Management, 31(5), 652–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.06.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nguyen Huu, T., Nguyen Ngoc, H., Nguyen Dai, L., Tran Thi, T. H., & Nguyen Thi, H. T. (2024). Effect of tourist satisfaction on revisit intention: Evidence from tourism destinations. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2322779. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2322779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Oh, H., Fiore, A. M., & Jeoung, M. (2022). Measuring experience economy concepts: Tourism and hospitality applications. Journal of Travel Research, 41(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287502239031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre and every business a stage. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Seyfi, S., Rather, R. A., & Hall, C. M. (2022). Visitor satisfaction and behavioral intentions in tourism destinations. Tourism Review, 77(2), 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-02-2021-0086 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ritchie, J. R. B., & Crouch, G. I. (2003). The competitive destination: A sustainable tourism perspective. CABI Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rosli, N. A., Zainuddin, Z., Yusoff, Y., Mohd Yusof, M. F., & Abdul Hamid, N. H. (2023). Destination image and revisit intention in island resorts. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(6), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.06.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Shukla, A., Mishra, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). Expectation Confirmation Theory: A systematic review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sorato, J. (2024). Gastronomy tourism and cultural identity in heritage destinations. Tourism Culture & Communication, 24(1), 55–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Stylidis, D. (2022). Resident–tourist interaction and destination image. Journal of Travel Research, 61(1), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520971258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. UN Tourism. (2025). International tourism recovers pre-pandemic levels. https://www.unwto.org/tourism-data [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Woo, K. H., & Khoo, S. L. (2023). Affordable housing and heritage city governance in George Town, Penang. Journal of Urbanism, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2023.2231234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. World Travel & Tourism Council. (2024). Travel & tourism economic impact research 2024. https://wttc.org/research/economic-impact [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Yoon, Y., & Uysal, M. (2005). An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty: A structural model. Tourism Management, 26(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2003.08.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Bibliometric Analysis of Scopus Literature (1987–2024) On Smart Technologies in Hospitality: From Artificial Intelligence to Augmented Reality.
• Gendered Food Environments: Differences in Food Availability and Perceptions Among Malaysian University Students
• Hospitality Inclusive Internship System (HIIS): An Innovative Internship Matching Platform for Person with Disabilities (PWD) Students
• Cultural Preservation Practices of Selected Cultural Sites, Province of Bohol
• ChatGPT and the Future of Travel: Exploring Trust and Adoption of AI-Powered Personalized Recommendations