Cultural Preservation Practices of Selected Cultural Sites, Province of Bohol

Authors

Gigi L. Ancog

Graduate School, University of Cebu - Main (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000251

Subject Category: Tourism & Hospitality

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 3129-3141

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-25

Accepted: 2025-10-31

Published: 2025-11-10

Abstract

Preservation is the key to extend the value of cultural sites. The study was conducted to determine the cultural preservation practices of selected cultural sites, Province of Bohol. The findings served as the basis of a proposed cultural preservation manual. Specifically, the study sought to identify the profile of respondents in terms of: age; gender; highest educational attainment; and length of service. Identify cultural preservation practices of the cultural site in terms of: protection from natural disasters; documentation/research; conservation/restoration; cultural knowledge; community involvement; and supportive policy and legislation. Determine the challenges encountered in implementing the cultural preservation practices and analyze if there is a significant relationship between profile of respondents and their cultural preservation practices. The study used descriptive-correlational research with researcher-made survey questionnaire. The respondents of the study were employees from 8 identified cultural sites with 42 respondents. The researcher used purposive sampling method. The study was conducted in selected cultural sites, particularly, Alburquerque; Baclayon; Dauis; Dimiao; Loay; Loboc; Panglao and Maribojoc. The instrument has 3 parts: profile of respondents; cultural preservation practices; and challenges encountered in implementing cultural preservation practices. Statistical tools include frequency count; per cent; weighted mean; ranking; one-way ANOVA; and multiple regression analysis were used in the study. The majority of respondents were 50-59 ages, females, holding college degrees and have served 0-5 years. Respondents regarded conservation and restoration efforts as highly practiced. Furthermore, protection from natural disasters; documentation and research; cultural education/knowledge; community engagement/involvement and supportive policy and legislation were regarded as moderately practiced. Lack of funds and resources; and natural calamities were identified as challenges to preservation. The analysis revealed no significant relationship between respondents’ profiles and their cultural preservation practices. Protecting cultural sites involves preventive conservation practices for sustainability. Recommendations include implementation of proposed cultural preservation manual and conduct further studies.

Keywords

practices, cultural preservation, sustainability

Downloads

References

1. Achille, C. & Fiorillo, F. (2022). Teaching and Learning of Cultural Heritage: Engaging Education, Professional Training, and Experimental Activities. Heritage, 5(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Azzopardi, E., Kenter, J. O., Young, J., Leakey, C., O’Connor, S., Martino, S., Flannery, W., Sousa, L. P., Mylona, D. & Frangoudes, K. (2023). What are heritage values? Integrating natural and cultural heritage into environmental valuation. People and Nature, 5(2), 368–383. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bülbül Bahtiyar, T. & Dişli, G. (2022). Risk management and preventive conservation of historic buildings: The case of Karatay Madrasah (Museum). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 77, 103079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ghayoumi, R., Charles, A. & Mousavi, S. M. (2023). A multi-level analysis of links between government institutions and community-based conservation: Insights from Iran. Ecology and Society, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14217-280233 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hiswara, A., Aziz, A. M. & Pujowati, Y. (2023). Cultural preservation in a globalized world: Strategies for sustaining heritage. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 1(03), 98–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Jang, H. & Mennis, J. (2021). The role of local communities and well-being in Unesco world heritage site conservation: An analysis of the operational guidelines, 1994–2019. Sustainability, 13(13), 7144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Li, J., Krishnamurthy, S., Pereira Roders, A. & Van Wesemael, P. (2020). State-of-the-practice: Assessing community participation within chinese cultural world heritage properties. Habitat International, 96, 102107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Liu, Y. (2022). Application of Digital Technology in Intangible Cultural Heritage Protection. Mobile Information Systems, 2022(1), 7471121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mekonnen, H., Bires, Z. & Berhanu, K. (2022). Practices and challenges of cultural heritage conservation in historical and religious heritage sites: Evidence from North Shoa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Heritage Science, 10(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00802-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. O’Connor, T. P., Hoge, D. R. & Alexander, E. (2005). The relative influence of youth and adult experiences on personal spirituality and church involvement. In experiencing social research. New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Romão, X. & Bertolin, C. (2022). Risk protection for cultural heritage and historic centres: Current knowledge and further research needs. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 67, 102652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102652 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Santos, C., Neto, M. J. P. & Neves, M. (2020). Information design in presentation, interpretation and dissemination of natural and cultural heritage. In F. Rebelo & M. M. Soares (Eds.), Advances in Ergonomics in Design (pp. 413–423). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20227-9_38 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Schorlemer S. Von. (2020). UNESCO and the Challenge of Preserving the Digital Cultural Heritage. Santander Art and Culture Law Review, 6(2), 33–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles