A Conceptual Review of Arabic Vowel Typology
Authors
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, UiTM Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, UiTM Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, UiTM Negeri Sembilan, Kuala Pilah Campus (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102100008
Subject Category: Linguistics
Volume/Issue: 10/21 | Page No: 65-74
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-18
Accepted: 2026-06-30
Published: 2026-07-24
Abstract
Mastery of the sound system, including the vowel system, is a fundamental aspect of language learning; however, it has often received limited attention in terms of detailed phonetic analysis. This study discusses the conceptual foundations for understanding the typology of Arabic vowels, specifically from a comprehensive phonetic and phonological perspective, in order to address the lack of systematic descriptions of Arabic vowel characteristics. Accordingly, this study aims to elaborate and conceptually describe the classification of Arabic vowels, encompassing vowel quantity (short and long vowels), vowel quality, their articulatory features from a scientific perspective, and their linguistic functions, while also highlighting the concept of Arabic vowel typology based on previous studies, in addition to identifying an appropriate theoretical framework to clarify the structure of these vowels. This study adopts a fully qualitative approach in the form of library research, through document analysis and literature reviews of modern Arabic phonetic books, journal articles, and previous linguistic studies related to the Arabic vowel system. Content analysis utilized to categorize and synthesize scholarly perspectives on vowel typology. Data are collected from primary classical Arabic linguistic sources and modern phonetic theories to construct a comprehensive typological framework. The findings indicate that Arabic vowel typology can be described through several main dimensions, namely vowel quantity, articulatory quality, and phonemic function. The study also reveals differences in approach between classical Arabic scholars and modern linguists in describing this vowel system. The analysis demonstrates that Arabic vowel distinctions are not merely a matter of duration; rather, vowels also function as integral components of syllable structure. This study contributes to a clearer and more systematic conceptual framework for Arabic vowel typology by providing a theoretical foundation that can be utilized, particularly in phonetics instruction and the development of more structured teaching materials. Furthermore, it offers a comprehensive and explicit theoretical reference for future research in Arabic linguistics.
Keywords
Vowel Typology, Arabic Language, Conceptual Review, Phonetics, Arabic Linguistics.
Downloads
References
1. ‘Abd Al-Jalīl, ‘A. Q. (1998). ‘Ilm al-ṣarf al-ṣawtīy. Al-Azminah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abd. Rahman, M. Z., & Mezah, C. R. (2010). Ciri-ciri bahasa Arab fonetik, morfologi & sintaksis. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. ʻAbduh, D. (n.d). Dirāsāh fī ʻilm aṣwāt al-ʻarabiyyah. Mu’assasah al-Ṣabāḥ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. ‘Abdullāh, ‘A. S. (2004). Muqaddimah fī ʻilm al-aswāt (Kitab manhajī mubassaṭ) (1st ed.). Matba‘ah al-Jāmi‘ah al-Islāmiyyah al-‘Ālamiyyah bi Mālīziyyā. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Addow, A. A., Omar, S. I., & Mohamud, A. A. (2025). An analysis of phonetic and phonological systems in classical Arabic and English: a contrastive study. Cogent Education, 12(1), 1-28. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2549514 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ahmad, Z., & Teoh, B. S. (2006). Fonologi autosegmental penerapannya pada bahasa Melayu. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Alfozan, A. I. (1989). Assimilation in classical Arabic a phonological study [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. University of Glasgow. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Al-Bakkūsy, T. (1992). Al-taṣrīf al-ʻarabiyy min khilāl ʻilm al-aṣwāt al-ḥadīth (3rd ed.). Al-Matbaʻah al-ʻArabiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Daniel Jones. M. A. (1922). An outline of English phonetics. G. E. Stechert & Co. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. El-Hassan, S. (1994). English accentuation and vowel quality as pronounced by Arabs: a pedagogic statement. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 29, 205-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Al-Farāhīdī, K. A. (2001). Kitāb al-ʻayn (1st ed.). Dār Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-‘Arabiyy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Al-Ghāmidīy, M. M. (2001). Al-ṣawtiyyāt al-‘arabiyyah (1st ed.). Maktabah al-Tawbah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ḥasan, ʻA. (1974). Al-nahw al-wafiy (3rd ed.). Dār al-Maʻārif. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hassan, A. (2007). Linguistik am (3rd ed.). PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Ibn Jinnī, A. F. (1993). Sir ṣināʻah al-iʻrāb (2nd ed.). Dār al-Qalam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Jalaluddin, N. H. (2007). Asas fonetik. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. al-Khuḍarīy. (1998). Hāsyiyyah al-Khuḍarīyy ʻalā syarḥ ibn ʻAqīl ʻalā alfiyyah ibn Mālik (1st ed.). Dār al-Kutub al-ʻilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Mavlanov, N. (2025). Variable phonetic phenomena in Arabic: a historical-phonological analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(3), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47134/jpbsi.v1i3.1757 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. McCarthy, J. J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12(3), 373-418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. McCarthy, J. J. (1982). Prosodic templates, morphemic templates, and morphemic tiers. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (Part 1). Holland Foris Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Md Isa, Z., Mohammad, W. M., Muhamad Saad, N., Ismail, H. S., Ismail, M. M., Mohamed, Y., & Abu Bakar, A. (2024). Arabic phonemes, allophones, and graphemes in the context of modern phonetics and phonology. Al-Azkiyaa - International Journal of Language and Education, 3(1), 13-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33102/alazkiyaa91 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Rahmatan, M., Sani, N., JH, D. A., Alfarisi, D. R., & JH, V. A. (2023). The role and function of phonemes in phonology for Arabic communication. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(2), 179-187. DOI: https://10.57092/ijetz.v2i2.52 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Rakhieh, B. A. (2009). The phonology of Maʻani Arabic: stratal or parallel OT [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. University of Essex. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Safa’ie, E. (2008). Proceedings of International Language conference. Muslim’s contributions to the modern linguistics: the descriptive framework of tajweed of the holy Qur’an and the generative phonology in contrast. International Islamic University Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Al-Syāʻir, H. ʻA. M. ʻA. (2015). Min amthilah ʻādaṯ waṣf al-ʻarabiyyah al-ẓāhirah al-iʻlāl anmūdhajan-. The Islamic College University Journal, 1(35), 361-379. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Syāhīn, ‘A. S. (1980). Al-manhaj al-ṣawtiy li al-binyah al-‘arabiyyah ru’yah jadīdah fī al-ṣarf al-‘arabiyy (1st ed.). Mu’assasah al-Risālah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Al-Syāyib, F. H. (2004). Athar al-qawānīn al-ṣawtiyyah fī binā’ al-kalimah (1st ed.). ‘Ālim al-Kutub al-Ḥadīth. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Al-Syāyib, F. H. (1989). Taʼammulāt fī baʻd ẓawāhir al-ḥadhf al-ṣarfiyy. Ḥawliyyāt Kulliyyah al-Ādāb, 10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Al-Tawwāb, R. ʻA. (1997). Al-madkhal ilā ʻilm al-lughah wa manāhij al-baḥth al-lughawiyy (3rd ed.). Maktabah al-Khanjiyy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Synonymy in the Songs of Ummaru Bagobiri: A Contextual Linguistics Analysis
- Aspect of Compounding and Affixation in Bassa-Nge
- Kinayah (Metonymy) in Malay: An Analysis Based on the Science of Balaghah
- Optimality Theory: Application of Dahl’s law in Kindia
- Selling Diversity: The Politics of Representation in Global Advertising