University Students' Perception on Online Engagement in Learning
Authors
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102100037
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/21 | Page No: 429-440
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-06
Accepted: 2026-07-11
Published: 2026-07-24
Abstract
Online learning has emerged as an advanced mode of learning and shaped learning developments in recent years. Online learning allows learning to take place remotely when needed and ensures the process of learning is able to take place. Nonetheless, issues emerge when some students could engage and immerse in online lessons well, while some others may be facing challenges and struggling in engaging in online learning. Interactions are needed to support engagement in digital learning, calling for the need of this study to examine learners’ perceptions towards online learning in the context of engagements among learners, between learners and instructors and learners and content engagement. Such examinations could assist in determining pedagogical improvements that could better enhance online learning experience. This study employed a survey-based approach using a questionnaire to pool target students’ perceptions in the form of means on matters pertaining to online learning engagement, in the aspects of engagement among learners themselves, instructors and learning content. Overall data revealed the highest mean supporting how much they preferred and needed online learning support from peers the most, yet also revealed a strong need for interactions with learning content, followed by valuing their teachers for positive online engagement. These findings suggest that positive engagements via these interactions matter to them. These results could impact the need for a standard and strong learning support system and more advanced pedagogical shift to support students in navigating online learning to create better online learning engagement in the modern landscape of the ever-growing digital world.
Keywords
online learning, students’ perception, interaction, online engagement
Downloads
References
1. Abalkheel, A. (2022). Amalgamating Bloom’s Taxonomy and artificial intelligence to face the challenges of online EFL learning amid post-COVID-19 In Saudi Arabia. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies. https://doi.org/10.18488/5019.v11i1.4409. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abou-Khalil, V., Helou, S., Khalifé, E., Chen, M., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2021). Emergency online learning in low-resource settings: effective student engagement strategies. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Akpen, C., Asaolu, S., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H., & Sampson, S. (2024). Impact of online learning on student's performance and engagement: a systematic review. Discover Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Almusharraf, A., & Almusharraf, N. (2021). Socio-interactive practices and personality within an EFL online learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3947–3966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10449-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Al-Obaydi, L., Shakki, F., Tawafak, R., Pikhart, M., & Ugla, R. (2023). What I know, what I want to know, what I learned: Activating EFL college students' cognitive, behavioral, and emotional engagement through structured feedback in an online environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1083673. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Alrashidi, O., Phan, H., & Ngu, B. H. (2016). Academic engagement: An overview of its definitions, dimensions, and major conceptualisations. International Education Studies, 9(12), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n12p41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Arifudin, O., (2025). Why digital learning is key to the future of education. International Journal of Education and Digital Learning 3 (4) https://doi.org/10.47353/ijedl.v3i4.261 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bergdahl, N. (2022) Engagement and disengagement in online learning. Computers & Education, 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104561 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Buelow, J. R., Barry, T., & Rich, L.E., (2018). Supporting learning engagement with online students. Online Learning 22 (4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hongsuchon, T., Emary, I., Hariguna, T., & Qhal, E. (2022). Assessing the impact of online-learning effectiveness and benefits in knowledge management, the antecedent of online-learning strategies and motivations: an empirical study. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052570 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hu, J., & Xiao, W., (2025) What are the influencing factors of online learning? A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Psychology https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1542652 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Jackson,S.L. (2015) Research methods and statistics-c Critical thinking approach (5tH Edition) Boston, USA: Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Jiang, P., Namaziandost, E., Azizi, Z., & Razmi, M. (2022). Exploring the effects of online learning on EFL learners’ motivation, anxiety, and attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a focus on Iran. Current Psychology (New Brunswick, N.j.), 42, 2310 - 2324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04013-x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Humber, J. F., (2021). In their own words: student engagement as defined by online learners. Journal of Higher Education, Theory & Practice. 21(2). chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://www.na-businesspress.com/JHETP/JHETP21-2/1_HumberFinal.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kaufmann, R., & Vallade J. I., (2020). Exploring connections in the online learning environment: student perceptions of rapport, climate, and loneliness. Interactive Learning Environments 30 (10). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749670 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Kennedy, G. (2020). What is student engagement in online learning … and how do I know when it is there? Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne. https://melbournecshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/3362125/student-engagement-onlinelearning_final.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Loh, H., Van Jaarsveld, G., Mesutoglu, C., & Baars, M. (2024). Supporting social interactions to improve MOOC participants’ learning outcomes: a literature review. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1345205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Martin, F. & Bolliger, D.U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning 22(1), 205- 222. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Masalimova, A., Zheltukhina, M., Sergeeva, O., Sizova, Z., Novikov, P., & Sadykova, A. (2024). Exploring higher education students’ attitudes toward e-learning after COVID-19. Contemporary Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14045. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Miao, J, Chang, J., & Ma, Li., (2022). Teacher-student interaction, student-student interaction and social presence: their impacts on learning engagement in online learning environments. The Journal of Genetic Psychology 183 (6). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2022.2094211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Moore, M. G., (1993). Three types of interaction. https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=9UTaAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA19&dq=moore+1989+theory+interaction&ots=s0Kl5v4t4D&sig=4KvvmpT8pS9FuSXH7zNHAsF1zQA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=moore%201989%20theory%20interaction&f=false [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Muzammil, M., Sutawijaya, A., & Harsasi, M. (2020). Investigating student satisfaction in online learning: the role of student interaction and engagement in distance learning university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770928. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Ong, S., & Quek, G. (2023). Enhancing teacher–student interactions and student online engagement in an online learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 1 - 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09447-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Rawashdeh, A., Mohammed, E., Arab, A., Alara, M., & Al-Rawashdeh, B. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using e-Learning in university education: analyzing students’ perspectives. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19, 107-117. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.19.3.2168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Redmond, P., Alexsen, M., Maloney, S., Turner, J., Brown, A., Basson, M., Gallison, L., Lawrence, J., & Henderson, R. (2023). Student perceptions of online engagement. Online Learning, 27(1), 383-403. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v27i1.3320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Richards, K., & Thompson, B. (2023). Challenges and instructor strategies for transitioning to online learning during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of literature. Frontiers in Communication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1260421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Ringer, N., Kreitz-Sandberg, S., (2022). Swedish pupils’ perspectives on emergency remote teaching during COVID-19- A qualitative study. International Journal of Educational Research Open. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Shahabani, N. S. (2023). Exploring the teaching of English syntax: tree diagram via an interactive multimedia Computer-aided Learning Material (CALM) (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)). https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/88769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Stecuła, K., & Wolniak, R. (2022). Advantages and Disadvantages of -learning innovations during COVID-19 pandemic in higher education in Poland. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8, 159 - 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Sun, H. L., Sun, T., Sha F. Y., Gu, X. Y., Hou, X. R., Zhu, F. Y., & Fang, P. T., (2022). The influence of teacher-students interaction on the effects of online learning: based on a serial mediating model. Frontiers in Psychology Educational Psychology 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779217 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Thanathuth, C., & Khlaisang, J., (2012). The learner support system for distance education. Creative Education (3). https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.38b011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Tu, Y., Wang, Q., & Huang, C. (2025). Facilitating students’ emotional engagement in synchronous online learning: a systematic literature eview. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i1.7732. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Turk, M., Turk, S., Muftuoglu, A., Karakaya, O., & Karakaya, K. (2024). Students’ expectations and experiences about engagement strategies in online courses: a mixed methods study. Online Learning. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.3937. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Wang, C. (2022). Comprehensively summarizing what distracts students from online learning: a literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1483531. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Wang, Q., Wen, Y., & Quek, C. (2022). Engaging learners in synchronous online learning. Education and Information Technologies 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11393-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4429 - 4452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11393-x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Weng, A., Chang, H., Lai, K., & Lin, Y. (2024). Topic modelling on peer interaction in online and mobile learning of higher education: 1993–2022. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080867. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Xiao, J., Chen, M., Yang, Y., & Liu, M., (2025) An explanatory multimodal study of the roles of the teacher-student interaction and emotion in academic performance in online classrooms. Education and Information Technologies 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13426-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study