The Use of Social Media Slang in Selected Tiktok Videos by Malaysian Gen Z Influencers

Authors

Muhammad Aqmarafiq Mohd Sukri @ Mohd Zahir

Academy of Language Studies Universiti Teknologi MARA,40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Nor Eleyana Abdullah

Academy of Language Studies Universiti Teknologi MARA,40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Mafarhanatul Akmal Ahmad Kamal

Academy of Language Studies Universiti Teknologi MARA,40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Ilham Alia Mat Isa

Academy of Language Studies Universiti Teknologi MARA,40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Noor Shariena Zaraini

Academy of Language Studies Universiti Teknologi MARA,40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Mohd Fadhli Shah Khaidzir

Pusat Pengajian Citra Universiti, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102100044

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/21 | Page No: 501-508

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-11

Accepted: 2026-07-17

Published: 2026-07-24

Abstract

This study investigates the linguistic forms and social functions of social media slang in TikTok videos produced by Malaysian Generation Z influencers. Drawing on Labov’s (1972) sociolinguistic theory of linguistic variation and Eckert’s (2000) framework of lexical repertoire and indexicality, a qualitative content analysis was conducted on a purposive sample of 20–30 videos. The findings reveal that influencers employ diverse linguistic forms, including lexical slang, abbreviations, acronyms, code‑mixing, emoji‑based slang, and viral phrases. These forms are not random but follow recognizable Gen Z speech norms, blending global internet slang with local Malaysian English features. Functionally, slang serves as a communicative resource for identity construction, solidarity and rapport, humor and entertainment, trend alignment, emphasis, and evaluation. By strategically combining global and local repertoires, Malaysian Gen Z influencers construct relatable personas, sustain audience engagement, and participate in TikTok’s fast‑paced trend culture. This study highlights slang as both a lexical repertoire and a social practice, underscoring its role in shaping digital youth identity and discourse.

Keywords

TikTok slang, Generation Z, Malaysian English, Influencers, Identity construction, Digital discourse

Downloads

References

1. Duffy, B. E. (2020). Influencers: The power of social media celebrity. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Blackwell Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Eleyana Abdullah, N., Mohamad, F., Kamal, M. A. A., & Mat Isa, I. A. (2023). TikTok as a tool for English language learning among Malaysian university students. Journal of Language Education Studies, 15(2), 77–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method for assessing and reporting thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 15(5), e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mehmood, A., & Nazir, S. (2024). Slang and audience engagement on social media: A discourse analysis. Journal of Digital Media Studies, 19(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Muzani, A., & Loftie, R. (2022). TikTok and the creation of new meanings: A study of lexical innovation. Journal of Media Linguistics, 10(4), 112–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mustapha, N. S., & Marzuki, E. (2024). Use of TikTok slang among Malaysian Generation Z. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. Retrieved from ResearchGate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nurliyana Mohd Nor Sham, A. K., Mohamad, F., & Md Johar, E. (2025). Exploring slang dynamics and semantic shifts in digital communication: A study of Generation Z on TikTok. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(24), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.924ILEIID0052 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Paoleti, M., & Mujahidah, N. (2025). Meta-study of Gen Z slang as cultural marker. Journal of Digital Communication Studies, 12(3), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Saric, A., & Pavlovic, K. (2022). Diachronic semantic and morphological analysis of abstract noun doublets of Norman French and Anglo Saxon origin. International Journal of Linguistics, 14(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v14i2.19876 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sen, A. (2024). Formal vs informal communication in digital contexts. Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 18(1), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Stahl, C., & Literat, I. (2023). Algorithmic diffusion and linguistic innovation on TikTok. Journal of Social Media & Society, 7(2), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Telaumbanua, J., Rahman, A., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Social media slang and identity in Gen Z communities. Asian Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(2), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles