Investigating Mandarin Writing and ChatGPT Using the Sociocultural Theory

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed language learning methods. ChatGPT has become one of the most popular tools in language learning as it can assist learners in different aspects, including generating ideas, checking vocabulary and grammar, improving sentence structure, and revising written work. This study aims to investigate Mandarin writing and ChatGPT through the perspective of sociocultural theory, focusing on the More Knowledgeable Other (MKO), Scaffolding, and the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). This quantitative study used a 5-point Likert-scale survey adapted from Vygotsky (1978), Raoofi et al. (2017), and Youssef et al. (2024). A total of 203 Mandarin learners from a local university in Malaysia participated in this study. The findings showed that learners generally perceived ChatGPT as a useful, supportive tool in Mandarin writing. The study also found significant relationships between ChatGPT and MKO, Scaffolding, and ZPD. The result suggests that ChatGPT can be integrated into Mandarin writing tasks as a guided learning tool. However, learners should still think critically to verify ChatGPT responses independently and be actively involved in the whole writing process.

(ChatGPT; Mandarin Writing; Sociocultural Theory; More Knowledgeable Other; Scaffolding; Zone of Proximal Development)

1. Adiguzel, T. (2023). Revolutionising education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad Azmi AbdelHamid Esmaeil, Dg Norizah Ag Kiflee & Dzulkifli, Ismail Maakip, O. O. M. & S., & Marshall. (2023). Understanding Student Perception Regarding The Use of ChatGPT in Their Argumentative Writing: A Qualitative Inquiry. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 150–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3904-08 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmad, N., Alias, F.A., Hamat, M., & Mohamed, S.A. (2024). Reliability Analysis: Application of Cronbach’s Alpha in Research Instruments. SIG: e-L earning@CS, 114-119. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ammar, M., Azman, B., & Ibrahim, A. B. (2025). Investigating AI Writing Tools in Enhancing Academic Writing Skills of Diploma in TESL Students of a Private College in Malaysia: The Moderating Role of Students’ Perceptions. International Journal Of Academic Research In Progressive Education And Development, 14(4), 1307–1314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ashfaraliana, N., Hadi, A., Mohamad, F., Johar, E., Kadir, Z. A., Bahasa, A. P., & Mara, U. T. (2024). Exploring the Acceptance of ChatGPT as an Assisting Tool in Academic Writing among ESL Undergraduate Students. International Journal Of Research And Innovation In Social Science (Ijriss), VIII(2454), 2886–2901. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chia, C. S. C., & Lee, K. (2024). Graduate Students' Perception and Use of ChatGPT as a Learning Tool to Develop Writing Skills. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6, 113–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Flower, L. and Hayes, J.R. (1981) A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/356600 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gasaymeh, Al-Mothana & Abu Qbeita, Asma'A & Almohtadi, Reham & Beirat, Prof. (2025). Exploring education students' use of ChatGPT for academic and personal purposes: insights from a developing country context. Frontiers in Education. 10. 1-10. 10.3389/feduc.2025.1580310. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. He, L. (2024). The Application of SPSS Correlation Analysis in the Study of Precision Teaching of English in Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Science, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jin, F., Peng, X., Sun, L., Song, Z., Zhou, K., & Lin, C.-H. (2025). Knowledge (co-)construction among artificial intelligence, novice teachers, and experienced teachers in an online professional learning community. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(2), Article e70004. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jmaiel, H. A., Abukhait, R. O., Mohamed, A. M., Shaaban, T. S., Al-khresheh, M. H., & AL-Qadri, A. H. (2025). The role of ChatGPT in enhancing EFL students’ ESP writing skills: An experimental study of gender and major differences. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00700-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Khairuddin, Z, Rahmat, N.H., Noor, M.M., & Khairuddin, Z. (2021). The Use of Rhetorical Strategies in Argumentative Essays. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(S3), 263-285. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Li, Y., et al. (2025). Knowledge (Co-)Construction Among Artificial Intelligence and Learners in Online Learning Environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mohammed Abdulkareem A. Alkamel, N. A. S. A. (2024). Utilizing an adaptable artificial intelligence writing tool (ChatGPT) to enhance academic writing skills among Yemeni university EFL students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rahmat, N.H. (2021). An Investigative Study of Cognitive and Metacognitive Paraphrasing Strategies in ESL Writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 11(3), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/8919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rahmat, N. H., & Whanchit, W. (2024). Exploring the Writing Process from The Social Cultural Theory. International Journal Of Academic Research In Business And Social Sciences, 14(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i3/20931 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Raoofi, S., Chan, S. H., Mukundan, J., & Rashid, S. M. (2017). A qualitative study into L2 writing strategies of university students. English Language Teaching, 10(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n2p1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Raoofi, S., Miri, A., Gharibi, J. & Malaki, B. (2017). Assessing and Validating a Writing Strategy Scale for Undergraduate Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 8(3), pp. 624-633. Retrieved from http://www.academypublication.com/issues2/jltr/vol08/03/23.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sanusi, S. S., Rosila, R., Berahim, R., Ahad, H. A., Afiqah, N., Latif, A., Ili, N., Tajuddin, A., & Rahmat, N. H. (2025). Investigating Online Learning Motivation through McClelland's Motivation Theory. TESOL Today, IX(Xxii), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sari, D. N., Astira, W. J., Husna, L., Pendidikan, P., & Inggris, B. (2026). An Analysis of English Department Students' Skill in Writing Argumentative Essays in FKIP UNES PADANG. Jurnal Armada Pendidikan, 4(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.60041/jap/v4i1.363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Silalahi, R. (2025). Indonesian Students' Perceptions Of Chatgpt For English Essay Writing [Persepsi Mahasiswa Indonesia Terhadap Chatgpt Dalam Penulisan Esai Bahasa Inggris]. Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 21(1), 1–35. dx.doi.org/10.1966/pji.v21i1.8896 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Subramaniam, I., & Mohamad, M. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review on the Impacts of Using ChatGPT and Other AI-Driven Tools in ESL Teaching and Learning. International Journal Of Academic Research In Progressive Education And Development, 13(3), 3613–3633. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i3/22897 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tran, M., Balasooriya, C., Semmler, C., & Rhee, J. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence: The ‘more knowledgeable other’ in a social constructivist framework of medical education. npj Digital Medicine, 8, 430. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01823-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Vetter, T.R. (2017). Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When, Where, and a Sixth, so What? Anesth Analg, 12595), 1797-1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Youssef, E., Medhat, M., Abdellatif, S., & Al Malek, M. (2024). Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman, UAE. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7(Dec 2024), 100316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Zhang, Y. (2025). Using ChatGPT in learning Chinese Mandarin: An interactive dictionary rather than a content facilitator. L2 Journal, 17(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5070/L2.42018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C.. (202) Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14 (1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study