The Influence of External and Internal Factors on Communication Strategies: A PLS-SEM Analysis

This study examines the influence of external and internal factors on learners’ communication strategies using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Communication strategies are important in helping learners maintain interaction and overcome difficulties in foreign language communication. Grounded in Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory and McCroskey’s Communication Apprehension Theory, the study investigates how environmental and psychological factors affect learners’ use of social-affective, fluency-oriented, negotiation for meaning, accuracy-oriented, and message reduction strategies. A quantitative approach was employed using a questionnaire adapted from Yaman and Kavasoğlu (2013) and Endler (1980). Data were collected from students enrolled in Introductory Arabic courses and analysed using SmartPLS 4 to assess the measurement and structural models. The findings revealed that external factors significantly influenced all dimensions of communication strategies, indicating that classroom environment, peer interaction, and audience response strongly affect learners’ communication behaviour. In contrast, internal factors such as anxiety and self-confidence did not show significant relationships with communication strategies. The results also demonstrated acceptable reliability, validity, and predictive relevance of the proposed model. Overall, the study highlights the importance of supportive learning environments in encouraging effective communication among learners. The findings provide valuable implications for educators and contribute to the understanding of communication strategies in foreign language learning contexts through the application of PLS-SEM analysis.

Communication Strategies, External Factors, Internal Factors, Communication Apprehension, PLS-SEM

1. Aripin, N., Rahmat, N.H., & Tarmizi, M.L.M. (2025). Public Speaking Anxiety (PSA): Causes and Classroom Strategies to Mitigate Anxiety Among ESL Learners. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(9), 2743-2757. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.909000236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Campos, J.A.D.B., Zucoloto, M.L., Bonafé, F.S.S., Jordani, P.C. and Maroco, J. (2011). Reliability and Validity of Self-Reported Burnout in College Students: A Cross Randomized Comparison of Paper-and-Pencil vs. Online Administration. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1875-1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Endler, N.S. (1980). Person-situation interaction and anxiety. In I. L. Kutash (Ed.), Handbook on stress and anxiety. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, pp.249-266. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fornell, C. and Bookstein. F.L. (1982) Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3151718 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gong, Z. & Kanai, H. (2025). Effects of appearance modifications on oral presentation anxiety in video conferencing. Sci Rep, 15(1):30090. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-15716-z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Goodman, S.N. (1999). Toward evidence-based medical statistics: 2. The Bayes factor. Clinical Trials, 6(3), 229–24 Bayes Factors, 233-240. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1504/ IJMDA. 2017.087624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hauf, S., Rickter, N. F., Saretedt, M., Ringle.,C. M. (2024). The Importance and Performance in PLS-SEM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78(2024) (100723). https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/109073/1/1- s2.0-S0969698924000195-main.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Karin, V., Yulisyanti, Y., & Abrori, R.K.D. (2025). Revealing Students’ Barriers and Strategies during Performing Presentation. Dinamika Bahasa dan Budaya: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Bahasa dan Budaya, 20(1), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.35315/bb.v20i1.10078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Martin, H., Craigwell, R., & Ramjarrie, K. (2022). Grit, motivational belief, self-regulated learning (SRL), and academic achievement of civil engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(4), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.2021861 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. McCroskey, J. C. (1977). Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00599.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Miller,G. (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some Limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81-97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning Components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ramayah, T., Cheah, F. Ting, H., & Memon, M.A. (2018). Partial least Equation Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SEM 3.0: An Updated Guide and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Pearson [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Using importance-performance matrix analysis (IPMA) in PLS-SEM: Using SmartPLS 3. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3169-3177. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-Cultural Theory. Mind in Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Yaman, Ş., Kavasoğlu, M. (2013). The adaptation study of oral communication strategy inventory into Turkish. International Journal of Human Sciences, 10(2), 400-419. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey A. E., Jennifer M. D., Meghan M. J., Thomas E. K, and Marna, C. (2021). Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice, 14 (1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests