Barriers To Effective Presentation Skills Among Architecture Undergraduates
Authors
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)
School of Education, Sunway University, Subang Jaya (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102100077
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/21 | Page No: 900-908
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-10
Accepted: 2026-07-15
Published: 2026-07-25
Abstract
Effective presentation skills are essential for architecture undergraduates as they are required to communicate design ideas, justify decisions, and engage in critical discussions throughout their academic and professional development. However, many students still face difficulties in articulating their ideas with confidence and effectiveness, especially in a critique-based architectural learning context. This study explores the barriers affecting presentation skills among architecture undergraduates at a Malaysian public university. The study was conducted using a qualitative case study approach with 20 undergraduate architecture students who were selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered from semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. The findings revealed three interconnected themes: psychological barriers, language and cognitive organization challenges, and delivery-related challenges. Participants reported feeling anxious due to fear of negative evaluation, difficulties with communicating design concepts in English, difficulty structuring ideas under pressure, and difficulties with engaging audiences during presentations. The results indicate that barriers to presentation are interrelated among the students of architecture, where emotional, communicative, and performance factors all play a part in influencing the ability to articulate design ideas effectively. This study emphasises the need to incorporate communication development into the architectural education along with technical design training. The results offer practical implications for teachers and curriculum designers in designing opportunities for presentation practice, feedback, and confidence building, which will help students to be more proficient in their communication skills and more competent in their professional lives.
Keywords
Presentation Skills; Architecture Education; Communication Barriers; Public Speaking Anxiety; Qualitative Study
Downloads
References
1. Afify, H. M. N., Alhefnawi, M. A. M., Istanbouli, M. J., Alsayed, A. H., & Elmoghazy, Z. A. A. E. G. (2021). An evaluation of physical model-making as a teaching method in the architectural design studio – A case study at Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(1), 1123–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aljohani, N. R., Aslam, A., Khadidos, A. O. and Hassan, S. U. (2022). Bridging the skill gap between the acquired university curriculum and the requirements of the job market: A data-driven analysis of scientific literature. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(3), 100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100190 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. An, F. Y., Ravindran, L., Al-Shaibani, G. K. S., & Kamel, G. (2022). Oral presentation anxiety among undergraduate Malaysian Chinese students in a private university. ASEAN Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 59-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Anuar, M. F., Mohd Shariff , S., & Zur, R. (2026). Communication Challenges in Fashion Portfolio Presentation: A Systematic Review of Malaysian Public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 11(38). Retrieved from https://ebpj.e-iph.co.uk/index.php/EBProceedings/article/view/7994 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Aziz, A. I., Wan Mohamed, W. N., & Mohammad Nor, N. H. (2022). Oral presentations difficulties and its causes: Preliminary analysis of UiTM Kelantan students. ESTEEM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(2), 45–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Basir, N. M., Zubairi, Y. Z., Jani, R. and Wahab, D. A. (2022). Soft skills and graduate employability: Evidence from Malaysian Tracer Study. Pertanika Social Sciences & Humanities, 30(4), 1975–1989. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.4.26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bukhori, M. F., Mohd-Nor, M. F. I., Mohd Tahir, M., & Ismail, A. H. (2021). Evaluation of architecture student classroom communication at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Journal of Design + Built, 14(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ch'ng, L. C., Noor Ain, S., & Chan, A. N. (2025). Enhancing the PSCAS: New insights into public speaking anxiety among ESL undergraduates. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijmal.v9i3.5889 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. (2018) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. El-Latif, M. A., Al-Hagla, K. S., & Hasan, A. (2020). Overview on the criticism process in architecture pedagogy. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(2), 753-762. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kadir@Shahar, H., & Abdul Raof, A. H. (2021). Speaking Apprehension: Evidence from Oral Presentations in Content Subject Classes. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v10.5683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kho, M. G.-W., Ting, S.-H., & Dumin, W. (2026). Language anxiety symptoms, self-efficacy and willingness to communicate among Malaysian university students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 483-497. https://doi.org/10.17509/zk5q0b42 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mari, T. S., Ng, V., Gunasagaran, S., & Kuppusamy, S. (2022). Are they ready yet: Architecture graduates employability skills from employers’ perspective. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 22(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.vol22no1.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Mayer, R. E. (2023). Using PowerPoints to assess students’ learning from multiple resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 74, 102204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102204 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Osman, I., Ibrahim, A., Mohd, I. H., Mohd Hashim, M. J., & Ahmad, N. N. (2025). Graduate soft skills and employability in Malaysia: The view of employers from different manufacturing companies. Social and Management Research Journal (SMRJ), 22(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Priya, P. (2024). Undergraduate Students’ Understanding of Public Speaking Anxiety in English Language Classroom. Journal of Transformative Praxis, 5(1), 54-64. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp/15760 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Raj, J. A. T., AlSaqqaf, A., & Apolonius, L. E. (2024). Facing "Goliath" in public speaking: Communication apprehension among Malaysian tertiary learners. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(3), 752–765. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i3.27874 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Tsang, A. (2020). The relationship between tertiary-level students’ self-perceived presentation delivery and public speaking anxiety: A mixed-methods study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 1060–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1718601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Waluyo, B., & Rofiah, N. L. (2021). Developing Students' English Oral Presentation Skills: Do Self-Confidence, Teacher Feedback, and English Proficiency Matter?. Mextesol Journal, 45(3), n3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Zhan, H., Cheng, K.M., Wijaya, L.F., and Zhang, S. (2024). Investigating the mediating role of self-efficacy between digital leadership capability, intercultural competence, and employability among working undergraduates. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 14(4), 796–820. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-02-2024-0032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study