Omani English Teachers’ Perspectives on Implementing Communicative Language Teaching in Post-Basic Schools: A Case Study

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) has been widely promoted as an approach emphasizing communicative competence and purposeful language use. Despite its prominence in English language education, a persistent gap exists between teachers' awareness and classroom implementation of CLT principles, particularly in non-native contexts such as Oman. While previous studies have quantified teacher awareness, limited qualitative research has explored how teachers interpret and adapt CLT within their specific classroom contexts. This qualitative case study investigated how six Omani English teachers in government post-basic schools (Grades 11–12) conceptualised and interpreted CLT within their classroom contexts. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using the Codes–Categories–Themes (CO–CAT) framework to identify patterns in teachers' perspectives. Teachers associated effective implementation of CLT with supportive classroom environments that foster confidence and communication. Teachers also viewed CLT as context-dependent, influenced by learner proficiency, lesson focus, instructional time, and classroom conditions, resulting in selective and adaptive implementation practices. Teachers conceptualised CLT not simply as a collection of communicative techniques, but as a set of interconnected conditions that support classroom communication, including learner participation, authentic language use, emotional support, and contextual adaptation. The study contributes to understanding the theory–practice gap as a process of professional judgement rather than a failure of implementation. The findings may inform teacher professional development, curriculum implementation, and communicative language teaching practices in Oman and similar EFL contexts.

Communicative Language Teaching, Teacher Perspectives, English Language Teaching, Omani EFL Teachers, Qualitative Study

1. Al Mamari, M. R. H., Al-Mekhlafi, A. M., & Al-Barwani, T. A. (2018). Is communicative language teaching being tested communicatively? An analysis of English tests in Oman. English Language Teaching, 11(11), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n11p83 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Issa, A., & Al-Bulushi, A. (2012). English language teaching reform in Sultanate of Oman: The case of theory and practice disparity. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11(2), 141–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-011-9110-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Khamisi, K. M., & Sinha, Y. K. (2022). Communicative language teaching methodologies in Omani EFL context. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 12(4), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2022.124035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Mahrooqi, R., & Denman, C. J. (2018). Introduction: English education in Oman: Current scenarios and future trajectories. In R. Al-Mahrooqi & C. J. Denman (Eds.), English education in Oman: Current scenarios and future trajectories (pp. 1–8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0265-7_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Sawafi, A., Al-Humaidi, S., & Al-Mekhlafi, A. M. (2019). EFL teachers’ awareness, practices and challenges of teaching English communicatively in Oman post-basic education schools. Studies in English Language Teaching, 7(3), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v7n3p289 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bax, S. (2003). The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal, 57(3), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–27). Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: A balance of relationship and rigor. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), e000057. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dos Santos, L. M. (2020). The discussion of communicative language teaching approach in language classrooms. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.72.104.109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537–560. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588427 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Oman Vision 2040. (2020). Oman Vision 2040. Government of Oman. https://fm-oman.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/reports/Oman2040-en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rahman, M. M., & Karim, A. (2019). Secondary school teachers’ and students’ perceptions and practices of communicative language teaching (CLT) in Bangladesh. Qualitative Research in Education, 8(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2019.4093 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Salam, M. Y., & Luksfinanto, Y. (2024). A comprehensive review of communicative language teaching (CLT) in modern classrooms. Lingeduca: Journal of Language and Education Studies, 3(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.70177/lingeduca.v3i1.1338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Savignon, S. J. (1987). Communicative language teaching. Theory Into Practice, 26(4), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848709543281 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Savignon, S. J. (2002). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 191–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wei, L., Lin, H.-H., & Litton, F. (2018). Communicative language teaching (CLT) in EFL context in Asia. Asian Culture and History, 10(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v10n2p1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study