Request Refusal in Historical Arabic Cinematic Dialogues: A Pragmatic Study of Lion of the Desert

Authors

Fahed Maromar

Academy Pengajian Bahasa (APB), Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Muhammad Afif Zuhaili bin Hasan

Academy Pengajian Bahasa (APB), Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Norhayuza Binti Mohamad

Academy Pengajian Bahasa (APB), Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Ahmad Bin Wan Abd Rahman

Academy Pengajian Bahasa (APB), Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Zuraini Binti Mohd Ramli

Academy Pengajian Bahasa (APB), Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102100099

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/21 | Page No: 1164-1172

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-06

Accepted: 2026-07-11

Published: 2026-08-05

Abstract

This study analyzes strategies of request refusal in the dialogues of the film Lion of the Desert with the aim of classifying these strategies according to the Beebe, Takahashi, & Uliss Weltz (1990) model and of elucidating their pragmatic and narrative functions within the cinematic text. The research adopts a functional pragmatic framework that links the choice of refusal form to power relations, social distance, and narrative context, addressing the lack of systematic studies that connect traditional refusal taxonomies to their dramatic functions in historical films. The design is a descriptive qualitative content analysis. The sample comprises 27 dialogue excerpts selected from a 173 minute film, treated as focused analytical units. Data were collected through repeated viewing and close observation, coded using a coding sheet based on the categories of Beebe et al. (1990), organized in Excel, and then subjected to manual qualitative analysis using content analysis techniques. The principal findings reveal a dominant use of indirect refusal as the preferred discursive strategy by characters seeking to avoid direct confrontation and to maneuver politically within the complexities of wartime. By contrast, direct refusal appears in decisive military moments and existential situations to convey resilience and principled steadfastness, while supportive strategies occur only marginally and are largely confined to emotional protection. This distribution leads to the interpretive conclusion that coercive political and military hierarchies reshape speech acts, transforming refusals from routine social politeness into symbolic, struggle laden linguistic choices that reflect power struggles and assertions of national identity. The study’s implications contribute to the literature on pragmatic mitigation and its cinematic applications, and it recommends that future research adopt mixed methods and broader comparative studies across Arab and global cinemas to trace the particular dynamics of resistance language.

Keywords

Pragmatics, request refusal, speech act, refusal strategy, cinematic dialogue

Downloads

References

1. Beebe, L. M., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella, E. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), On the development of communicative competence in a second language (pp. 55–73). Newbury House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book270548 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hendar, H., & Anshari, M. M. S. (2021). Pragmatics analysis on refusal and politeness strategies in Home Alone movie by John Hughes. English Journal Literacy Utama, 5(2), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.vol5.iss2.2021.139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Liu, X., & Liu, N. (2022). A cross-cultural study of refusal speech acts in China, Korea, and America. Lecture Notes on Language and Literature, 5(3), Article 050301. https://doi.org/10.23977/langl.2022.050301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Martin, F., & Oliver, T. (2022). A qualitative content analysis of online public mental health resources for COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 553158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.553158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mohd Kamal, N. A., & Ariffin, A. (2023). Gender and power relation in English refusal strategies of ESL undergraduates. e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2003.21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Norma, S., Siti Jamilah, B., & Ahmad Affendi, S. (2021). Realization of the speech act of refusals among Malay ESL students. Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 24, 27–52. https://doi.org/10.32890/jps2021.24.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Subedi, K. R. (2021). Determining the sample in qualitative research. Scholars’ Journal, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3126/scholars.v4i1.42457 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Villamin, P., Lopez, V., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2024). A worked example of qualitative descriptive design: A step-by-step guide for novice and early career researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Wongsittikan, N. (2022). Patterns in declining an invitation: Cross-cultural differences in Korean and Thai refusals. Manutsat Paritat: Journal of Humanities, 44(1), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/manutparitat.v44i1.254268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Wulandary, H. (2022). Analysis of commissive speech act in Moana the movie. Al'Adzkiya International of Education and Sosial (AIoES) Journal, 3(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.55311/aioes.v3i2.187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wutich, A., Beresford, M., & Bernard, H. R. (2024). Sample sizes for 10 types of qualitative data analysis: An integrative review, empirical guidance, and next steps. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241296206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Zhang, F. (2022). A developmental study of pragmatic strategies of refusals by Chinese English majors. English Language Teaching, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n10p1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles