“Stronger Immunity, Smarter Future”: Biopolitics and the Discursive Construction of the Smarative Child in Aptamil KID Advertising

Commercial milk formula advertising increasingly incorporates biomedical terminology and developmental claims to position nutritional products as essential tools for supporting children’s health and cognitive growth. This study examines how such narratives are constructed in the Aptamil KID (C-section Synbiotic) radio advertisement. Utilizing Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) in tandem with Multimodal Discourse Analysis (MDA), this research investigates both the linguistic and sonic elements of the advertisement to explore how marketing discourse frames specialized nutrition for Caesarean-section-born children. The findings reveal that the advertisement constructs a subtle narrative of biological vulnerability by repeatedly categorizing “C-section-born children” as a distinct cohort requiring specialized nutritional intervention. Scientific terminology and quantitative references, such as “5.7 billion probiotics,” function as rhetorical devices to enhance commercial credibility while presenting formula as a technologically advanced solution for immune system development. Simultaneously, the slogan “stronger immunity, smarter future” discursively links physiological resilience with long-term cognitive potential, reinforcing broader neoliberal cultural expectations surrounding competitive parenting and developmental optimization. Building on these findings, this study proposes the concept of the “Smarative Child”; a discursive figure in which biological health and intellectual competitiveness are fused through narratives of nutritional engineering. This study contributes to critical health communication and advertising research by demonstrating how formula marketing translates complex biomedical knowledge into consumer-oriented imperatives about childhood development and parental responsibility.

Critical Discourse Analysis; Multimodal Discourse Analysis; Formula Milk Advertising; Microbiome Marketing; Neoliberal Parenting; Child Development Discourse

1. Aamann, I. C. (2020). Neoliberalism, healthism and moral judgements: a psychosocial approach to class. Journal of Psychosocial Studies, 13(3), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1332/147867320x15985349320779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aureoles-García, V., Unar-Munguía, M., Santos-Guzmán, A., Tolentino-Mayo, L., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2025). Digital Marketing Claims and Their Association With the Perceptions of Parents of Children Under 2 Years Old of Commercial Milk Formulas in Mexico. Maternal & Child Nutrition, e70001. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.70001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baker, P., Santos, T., Neves, P. A., Machado, P., Smith, J., Piwoz, E., Barros, A. J. D., Victora, C. G., & McCoy, D. (2020). First‐food systems transformations and the ultra‐processing of infant and young child diets: The determinants, dynamics and consequences of the global rise in commercial milk formula consumption. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13097 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baker, P., Smith, J., Salmon, L., Friel, S., Kent, G., Iellamo, A., Dadhich, J., & Renfrew, M. J. (2016). Global trends and patterns of commercial milk-based formula sales: is an unprecedented infant and young child feeding transition underway? Public Health Nutrition, 19(14), 2540–2550. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980016001117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: A multimedia toolkit and coursebook. Equinox. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bryzek, M., Mynarska, M., Karaś, D., & Marcinkowska, M. (2024). Human values behind intensive parenting. Current Psychology, 43(44), 34127–34137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06883-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cheung, K. Y., Petrou, L., Helfer, B., Porubayeva, E., Dolgikh, E., Ali, S., Ali, I., Archibald-Durham, L., Brockway, M. (Merilee), Bugaeva, P., Chooniedass, R., Comberiati, P., Cortés-Macías, E., D’Elios, S., Feketea, G., Hsu, P., Kana, M. A., Kriulina, T., Kunii, Y., & Madaki, C. (2023). Health and nutrition claims for infant formula: international cross sectional survey. BMJ, 380(8371), e071075. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071075 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Das, R. (2023). Contexts and dimensions of algorithm literacies: Parents’ algorithm literacies amidst the datafication of parenthood. The Communication Review, 27(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2023.2247825 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dogra, S., Chung, C., Wang, D., Sakwinska, O., Colombo Mottaz, S., & Sprenger, N. (2021). Nurturing the Early Life Gut Microbiome and Immune Maturation for Long Term Health. Microorganisms, 9(10), 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gad, A. G. M., Osarhiemen, I. O., & Idama, V. (2024). Current Models of Innovation and Market Strategies in Pharmaceutical Development: A Comprehensive Review. Asian Journal of Research in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 13(4), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrimps/2024/v13i4275 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hidayana, I., Prawindarti, L., Umar, N., Ambarwati, K., & Rosatriani, F. (2023). Marketing of commercial milk formula during COVID‐19 in Indonesia. Maternal & Child Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13491 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Horwood, C., Mapumulo, S., Haskins, L., Doherty, T., Kingston, G., & Rollins, N. (2024). Women’s exposure to commercial milk formula marketing: A WHO multi-country study. Globalization and Health, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-024-01088-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ignacio, A., Czyz, S., & McCoy, K. D. (2024). Early life microbiome influences on development of the mucosal innate immune system. Seminars in Immunology, 73, 101885–101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2024.101885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jeong, J., Franchett, E. E., Ramos de Oliveira, C. V., Rehmani, K., & Yousafzai, A. K. (2021). Parenting interventions to promote early child development in the first three years of life: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine, 18(5), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jiang, X., Tan, L., Zhang, X., & Fuchs, S. (2025). Probiotic products from laboratory to commercialization. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 145, 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kennedy, K. M., Plagemann, A., Sommer, J., Hofmann, M., Henrich, W., Surette, M. G., Braun, T., & Sloboda, D. M. (2025). Delivery mode, birth order, and sex impact neonatal microbial colonization. Gut Microbes, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2025.2491667 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lei, G., Khan, A., Budryn, G., & Grzelczyk, J. (2024). Probiotic products from laboratory to commercialization. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 155, 104807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104807 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. List, J. A., Pernaudet, J., & Suskind, D. L. (2021). Shifting parental beliefs about child development to foster parental investments and improve school readiness outcomes. Nature Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25964-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mas Manchón, L. (2016). La estructura emocional del mensaje publicitario en radio. Área Abierta, 16(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_arab.2016.v16.n1.49306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mitchell, C. M., Mazzoni, C., Hogstrom, L., Bryant, A., Bergerat, A., Cher, A., Pochan, S., Herman, P., Carrigan, M., Sharp, K., Huttenhower, C., Lander, E. S., Vlamakis, H., Xavier, R. J., & Yassour, M. (2020). Delivery Mode Affects Stability of Early Infant Gut Microbiota. Cell Reports Medicine, 1(9), 100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Molldrem, S., Moses, J., Smith, E., Tumilty, E., & Farroni, J. (2025). Metrics Producing Science. Science & Technology Studies. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.145702 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Reyna, V. F. (2020). A scientific theory of gist communication and misinformation resistance, with implications for health, education, and policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912441117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rodero, E., & Larrea, O. (2020). Audio Design in Branding and Advertising. Routledge EBooks, 69–85. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009276-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. World Health Organization. (2022, April 28). Scope and impact of digital marketing strategies for promoting breastmilk substitutes. Www.who.int. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240046085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. World Health Organization & UNICEF (2024). Marketing of breast-milk substitutes: National implementation of the international code (Status report 2023). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240094482 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Xiang, Q., Wu, X., Pan, Y., Wang, L., Cui, C., Guo, Y., Zhu, L., Peng, J., & Wei, H. (2020). Early-Life Intervention Using Fecal Microbiota Combined with Probiotics Promotes Gut Microbiota Maturation, Regulates Immune System Development, and Alleviates Weaning Stress in Piglets. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(2), 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020503 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, L., Zhang, Z., Hettinga, K., Yang, H., & Deng, J. (2024). A Comprehensive Review on Dietary Polysaccharides as Prebiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics in Infant Formula and Their Influences on Gut Microbiota. Nutrients, 16(23), 4122. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16234122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Synonymy in the Songs of Ummaru Bagobiri: A Contextual Linguistics Analysis
• Aspect of Compounding and Affixation in Bassa-Nge
• Kinayah (Metonymy) in Malay: An Analysis Based on the Science of Balaghah
• Optimality Theory: Application of Dahl’s law in Kindia
• Selling Diversity: The Politics of Representation in Global Advertising