The Influence of Metacognitive Strategies and Resource Management on Japanese Language Learning: A PLS-SEM Analysis

The level of regulation for learners’ cognitive strategies and learning behaviours is frequently influenced by how effective their language learning is, namely, the foreign language. Thus, this research examines the effect of metacognitive strategies, as well as resource management, on Japanese language learning utilizing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). This research uses a hierarchical component model (Type II) with a reflective-reflective construct to identify the association between metacognitive self-regulation, resource management, and cognitive learning strategies. The data were collected using a survey adapted from Wenden and Rubin (1987). The survey consists of 41 items and is measured on a 5-point Likert scale. The respondents were from a public university in Malaysia, with a distribution of 51% male and 49% female. The findings were analysed using SmartPLS 4 by adopting the measurement procedure and structural model. These findings reveal that metacognitive self-regulation and resource management play a vital role in encouraging cognitive strategies (organization, elaboration, and critical thinking). Japanese language learners can achieve better academic performance by planning, monitoring, and gauging their learning, while also handling their time effectively, putting in effort, and managing their materials. This research finds that these strategies together improve motivation, competence, and increase participation in linguistic acquisition. A comprehensive framework for learner behaviour can be theoretically understood by integrating Piaget’s cognitive theory and Zimmerman’s self-directed learning model. Meanwhile, this research recommends that educators design reflective tasks as well as structured resource management in the curriculum to encourage autonomy among learners. It is also recommended that future studies explore the effects of longitudinal and technology-enabled classrooms to obtain more holistic insights into strategic learning behaviour.

Metacognitive Strategies, Resource Management, Language Learning, Self-Regulated Learning, PLS-SEM

1. Abas, N. A., Zubbir, N., Saiful Azam, N., & Jamrus, M. H. M. (2024). Direct and Indirect Language-Learning Strategies in Japanese Language Acquisition. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(3). Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.6007/IJARBSS/V14-I3/20907 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, N., Sharif, S., Yean, C. P., & Sharina, G. (2024). Exploring The Relationship of Language Learning Strategies: The Case for Learning Japanese. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i2/20786 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amali, N. A. K., Ibrahim, I. W., Ismail, S., Isa, H. M., Yazid, N. I., & Razif, F. Z. M. (2024). Balancing Motivation and Burnout in The Learning of Foreign Languages. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(2), 828–847. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i2/20633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language Learning Strategy Instruction: Current Issues and Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Conley, D. T. (2014). Learning Strategies as Metacognitive Factors: A Critical Review. Educational Policy Improvement Center (EPIC), Prepared for The Raikes Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED593387.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982) Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3151718 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gamage, G. H. (2026). Kanji Learning Strategies and Language Background of L2 Japanese Language Learners. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 11(4). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Goodman, S. N. (1999). Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics: 2. The Bayes Factor. Clinical Trials, 6(3), 229–24 Bayes Factors, 233-240. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated Guidelines on Which Method to Use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.10008574 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hauf, S., Rickter, N. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle. C. M. (2024). The Importance and Performance in PLS-SEM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78(2024) (100723). https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/109073/1/1- s2.0-S0969698924000195-main.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Heather, J. (2022). Validating a Japanese Version of the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI): A PLS-SEM Repeated Indicator Analysis. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 31(1), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Karbalaei, A. (2011). Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. Íkala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 16(28), 5-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lensun, S. F., Harahap, P. B. P., & Pandi, H. M. L. (2025). Developing Metacognitive Awareness Through Mnemonic Strategy Training: A Study on Self-Regulated Learning Among Japanese Language Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(7), 2280–2289. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1507.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Liang, J. (2022). A Summarize of Cognitive Linguistics Research in Japanese and English in Our Country in The Past Ten Years. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 5(15). https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2022.051503 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Matsumoto, M., & Obana, Y. (1984). Motivational Factors and Persistence in Learning Japanese as A Foreign Language. The New Zealand Asian Studies Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive Development in Children: Piaget Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ramayah, T., Cheah, F. Ting, H., & Memon, M.A. (2018). Partial Least Equation Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using SEM 3.0: An Updated Guide and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain More Insight from Your PLS-SEM Results: The Importance-Performance Map Analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9): 1865–1886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Smala, S. (2020). Metacognitive Awareness in Language Learning Strategies and Strategy Instruction in CLIL Settings. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 2(2):20-35. DOI:10.52598/jpll/2/2/3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Schwartz, T. (2007). Manage Your Energy, Not Your Time. Harvard Business Review, 85(10):63-6, 68, 70-3, 164. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5874833_Manage_your_energy_not_your_time [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Singh, K. K. M., Loh, D. E. F., Leong, I. Y. C., Ngor, P. Y., Seng, C. Y., & Hamid, N. A. A. (2021). Motivational Orientations of Learning Japanese as A Foreign Language Among Undergraduates in A Public University in Malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3). DOI:10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14525 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner Strategies in Language Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive Strategy Use and Academic Reading Achievement: Insights from a Chinese Context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54-69. https://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/docroot/v10n12013/zhang.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ziegenfuss, J. Y., Casey, A. E., Jennifer, M. D., Meghan, M. J., Thomas, E. K, & Marna, C. (2021). Impact of Demographic Survey Questions on Response Rate and Measurement: A Randomized Experiment. Survey Practice 14(1), https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2021-0010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study