Epistemic Cognitions and Teacher Development in Physical Education: Understanding How Teachers Integrate Physical and Digital Literacy in Practice

Physical literacy has become a central concept guiding contemporary physical education (PE) curricula worldwide. In Malaysia, for example, when policy documents emphasise its holistic and lifelong orientation, less is known about how teachers understand and articulate physical literacy in practice, particularly within digitally mediated teaching contexts. This study examines Physical Education (PE) teachers’ epistemic cognitions of physical literacy and the integration of digital learning in teaching. Using an Epistemic Judgement approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted among fourteen secondary school PE teachers to explore their understanding of digital technologies, perceived competence, and willingness to adapt to technological changes. The findings indicate that teachers conceptualise physical literacy as a holistic, lifelong construct encompassing not only movement competence but also motivation, confidence, health awareness, and social development. Teachers view digital learning as epistemically valuable when it supports understanding, reflection, and inclusivity, rather than merely enhancing efficiency or engagement. However, tensions emerge between teachers’ epistemic ideals and structural constraints, including limited instructional time, inadequate facilities, uneven access to technology, and persistent perceptions of Physical Education as a less academically significant subject. These constraints shape teachers’ professional judgement and influence how epistemic goals are enacted in practice. Implications are discussed for teacher development, suggesting a shift from technical training toward epistemic professional learning that supports teachers’ reasoning, judgement, and reflective decision-making in complex classroom contexts.

Epistemic Cognitions, Teacher Development, Physical Education, Physical Literacy, Digital Literacy

1. Audrin, C., & Audrin, B. (2022). Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: A systematic literature review using text mining. *Education and Information Technologies, 27*(6), 7395–7419. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Delaney, B., Donnelly, P., News, J., & Haughey, T. J. (2008). Improving physical literacy. Sport Northern Ireland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Edwards, L.C., Bryant, A.S., Keegan, R.J. et al. Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review. Sports Med 47, 113–126 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gil-Espinosa, F. J., Nielsen-Rodríguez, A., Romance, R., & Martínez-Olmo, F. (2022). Smartphone applications for physical activity promotion from physical education. *Education and Information Technologies, 27*, 11759–11779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11001-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Godbout P. Emergence of physical literacy in physical education: some curricular repercussions. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog. 2023;28(5):503–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.2004109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gómez-García, G., Marín-Marín, J. A., & Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M. (2020). Effect of the flipped classroom and gamification methods in the development of a didactic unit on healthy habits and diet in primary education. *Nutrients, 12*(7), 2210. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12072210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Goodyear, V. A., Kerner, C., & Quennerstedt, M. (2019). Young people’s uses of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies: Surveillance, self-surveillance, and resistance. *Sport, Education and Society, 24*(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1375907 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Grecic, D. (2025). The Epistemic Judgement Chain to Support Holistic Physical Education Teacher Development-An Initial Study. Research in Physical Education, Sport and Health, 13(2), 49-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Grecic, D., and Palmer, C. (2021). The CARE curriculum in physical education and sport: A guide to pupil and athlete development. Preston: Sport and Wellbeing Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Grecic, D., Sprake, A., Thomson, A., Christodoulides, E., & Palmer, C. (2024). The epistemic judgement framework: A reflexive tool for physical education teachers’ professional development to support quality physical education. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1480690. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1480690 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hofer, B. K. (2002). Epistemological world views of teachers: From beliefs to practice. Issues in Education, 8(2), 167–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of Research on Teacher Belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Knoke, C., Woll, A. & Wagner, I. Health promotion through digital media in physical education: a qualitative interview study on student experiences and acceptance. Ger J Exerc Sport Res (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-026-01133-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Luguterah, A.W. Integration of physical literacy into physical education (PE) curricula to align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Discov Sustain 7, 547 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02719-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tremblay, M. S. (2012). Major initiatives related to childhood obesity and physical inactivity in Canada: The year in review. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 103(3), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. UNESCO (2015). Quality physical education. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. UNESCO (2023b). Quality Physical Education Guidelines for Policy Makers. Available online at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Valle-Muñoz, V. M., Mendoza-Muñoz, M., & Villa-González, E. (2025). Physical Literacy as a Pedagogical Model in Physical Education. Children, 12(8), 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12081008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Villasana, M. V., Pires, I. M., Sá, J., Garcia, N. M., Teixeira, M. C., Zdravevski, E., Chorbev, I., & Lameski, P. (2020). Promotion of healthy lifestyles to teenagers with mobile devices: A case study in Portugal. *Healthcare, 8*(3), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030315 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Whitehead M. (2013). Definition of physical literacy and clarification of related. ICSSPE Bull J Sport Sci Phys Educ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Whitehead, M. (2010). Physical literacy throughout the life-course. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Whitehead, M. E., Durden-Myers, E. J., and Pot, N. (2018). The value of fostering physical literacy. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 37, 252–261. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2018-0139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. WHO (2018). Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More active people for a healthier world. Geneva: World Health Organization [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study