Enhancing Language Learning Autonomy and Proficiency through AI-Driven Metacognitive Strategies

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly changed the landscape of language learning today. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into language learning offers new avenues for fostering metacognitive strategies implemented throughout the learning process. This study examined the relationship between AI usage and metacognitive strategy adoption among undergraduates within tertiary educational institutions. A quantitative survey was administered to 120 respondents from several academic programs at selected university in Malaysia, and the data were analysed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Results demonstrated that AI use was positively associated with metacognitive strategy adoption, which in turn mediated positive effects on both learner autonomy and language proficiency. These results underscore the pivotal role of AI as a cognitive scaffold, offering theoretical contributions to metacognitive strategy research and practical insights for policymakers and language instructors implementing AI-driven language curricula.

Artificial Intelligence, Language Learning, Metacognitive Strategies

1. Abdullah, H., Sahudin, Z., Bahrudin, N. Z., Bujang, I., & Khalid, K. (2023). Determinants of educational technology acceptance: An integration of TAM and UTAUT. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(4), 638–650. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Albedah, F. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in language education: A systematic review of multilingual applications, large language models, and emerging challenges. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 49, 247-268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: Effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 584-607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833767 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chaudhry, M.A. & Kazim, E. (2022) Artificial intelligence in education (AIEd): A high-level academic and industry note 2021. AI and Ethics 2, 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chai, C. S., Lin, P.-Y., Jong, M. S.-Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K. F., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions of and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students. Educational Technology and Society, 24(3), 89–101. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032858 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dokukina, I., & Gumanova, J. (2020). The rise of chatbots – new personal assistant in foreign language learning, Procedia Computer Science, 169, 542-546, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hair, J. F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM, European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24, DOI 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ismail, M. H., Hassan, S., & Ali, S. N. D. H. M (2023). Assessing foundation students’ acceptance of using video conferencing technologies (VCTs) as online learning platforms during the pandemic. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(1), 195 - 207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Li, B., Tan, Y. L., Wang, C., & Lowell, V. (2025). Two years of innovation: A systematic review of empirical generative AI research in language learning and teaching, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100445, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lin, C., Narayanan, G., & Noor, H. M. (2024). University-related factors in technology integration: A quantitative study in east coast of China. Asian Journal of University Education, 20 (2), 357-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i1.26029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Authentik. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Muñoz-Basols, J., Gutiérrez, M. F., & Balkwill, E. (2025). Opportunities for artificial intelligence (AI) in language teaching and Learning. In J. Muñoz-Basols, M. F. Gutiérrez, & L. Cerezo (Eds.), Technology-mediated language teaching: From social justice to artificial intelligence, 297–315. Multilingual Matters and Channel View Publications, https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29308406.19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Radzuan, F. A. A. & Arif, M. M. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into language teaching approaches: A systematic review of flipped classrooms, International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 44-58, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v15i2.11943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ranjan, R., Philominraj, A., & Saavedra, R. A. (2021). On the relationship between language learning strategies and language proficiency in Indian universities, International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 73-94. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1435a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rahman, M. M., Abdul Karim & Sigh, M. K. M. (2022). English language policy and planning in Malaysia: Issues and outcomes. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(3), 1079-1087, http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.3.23.1079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sabarun, Widiati, U., Suryati, N., & Azman, M. N. A. (2024). The correlation between different interventions in writing strategy and self-confidence in constructing argumentative essays at higher education level. Asian Journal of University Education, 20 (1), 221-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i1.26029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sharples, M., & Pérez y Pérez, R. (2022). Story machines: How computers have become creative writers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003146391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Soler Montes, C., & Juan-Lázaro, O. (2025). Digital language immersion (DLI) and virtual exchanges. In J. Muñoz-Basols, M. Fuertes Gutiérrez, & L. Cerezo (Eds.), Technology-mediated language teaching: From social justice to artificial intelligence (pp. 232–255). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/MUNOZ9872 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57, 100752. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. asw. 2023. 100752 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. UNESCO World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (2019) Preliminary Study on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO. https://unesdoc. unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367823. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Yeh, S. N., & Siah, C. R. (2025). Students’ attitudes toward LLMs and its association with metacognitive abilities: A cross-sectional study, Nurse Education in Practice, 88, 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Xu, T., & Wang, H. (2025). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on English language learning achievement, System, 125, 103428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study