Beyond the Game: Linking Game-Based Learning, Emotional Intelligence, and Student Engagement in Inclusive Higher Education
Authors
Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Kampus Bandaraya Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Kampus Bandaraya Melaka, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102100150
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/21 | Page No: 1794-1803
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-03
Accepted: 2026-09-08
Published: 2026-10-02
Abstract
Game-based learning (GBL) is often used in higher education to encourage active participation. Yet students do not all respond to game-based activities in the same way. This conceptual paper brings together GBL, student engagement, and emotional intelligence (EI) in inclusive higher education. It views engagement as behavioural, emotional, and cognitive involvement in learning. In the proposed framework, GBL is the independent variable, student engagement is the dependent variable, and EI is a potential moderator. Students' ability to recognise, understand, and manage emotions may affect how they respond to challenge, feedback, teamwork, competition, success, and failure in a game. EI may therefore help explain when GBL supports engagement and for whom it works best. This perspective adds an emotional dimension to inclusive GBL alongside cognitive, behavioural, and accessibility differences. Empirical studies are needed to test the proposed relationships across student groups, disciplines, and types of game-based activity.
Keywords
game-based learning; student engagement; emotional intelligence; inclusive higher education; educational technology
Downloads
References
1. Abellán, C. A., & López, M. C. S. (2026). Exploring the connection between emotional intelligence and inclusive education. Revista Complutense de Educación, 37(1), 115–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.99935 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2025). Evaluating the impact of inclusive and accessible learning technologies on student engagement and academic performance in higher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2025.2593563 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Baldwin, A., & Rankin, D. (2025). Rethinking first-generation student engagement in the higher education experience. In How first-generation students navigate higher education through an embrace of their multiple identities (pp. 117–140). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003587873-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Camilleri, V. (2023). Designing GBL for higher education: Pitfalls & recommendations. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-Based Learning, 2023-October, 869–875. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecgbl.17.1.1900 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Chen, X., Zou, D., Kohnke, L., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2021). Affective states in digital game-based learning: Thematic evolution and social network analysis. PLoS ONE, 16(7), e0255184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Elsom, S., Westacott, M., Stieler-Hunt, C., Glencross, S., & Rutter, K. (2023). Finding resources, finding friends: Using an alternate reality game for orientation and socialisation in a university enabling program. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 2635–2649. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1894181 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Falola, H., Joel, O. O., Akinbode, J., & Ojebola, O. (2026). Emotional intelligence and academic engagement of graduate students: The moderating role of digital learning support. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 17(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-03-2024-0203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ho, A. G. (2026). Emotionally adaptive interaction techniques for enhanced learning experiences. Springer Series in Design and Innovation, 59, 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-00733-9_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hunt, J. H., Taub, M., Marino, M., Holman, K., & Womack-Adams, K. (2025). Increasing student engagement, fraction knowledge, and STEM interest through game-based intervention. Journal of Special Education Technology, 40(4), 480–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434251314014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Jensen, C. G., & Dau, S. (2019). A framework for game-based learning design in higher education. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-Based Learning, 2019-October, 872–880. https://doi.org/10.34190/GBL.19.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Kaur, I., Shri, C., & Mital, K. M. (2019). The role of emotional intelligence competencies in effective teaching and teacher’s performance in higher education. Higher Education for the Future, 6(2), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631119840542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ketonen, E. E., Kruskopf, M., Lonka, K., & Mattlin, M. (2026). Dynamics of university students' epistemic emotions during game-based learning in an international relations course. Instructional Science, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09771-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lin, H. (2025). The influence of emotional intelligence on academic motivation among college students in Western Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of the Balkan Tribological Association, 31(5), 1083–1099. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Maguire, R., Egan, A., Hyland, P., & Maguire, P. (2017). Engaging students emotionally: The role of emotional intelligence in predicting cognitive and affective engagement in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1185396 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Manzano-León, A., Rodríguez-Rivera, P., Raposo-Rivas, M., & Rodríguez-Ferrer, J. M. (2024). Digital game-based learning for transgender identity awareness: A qualitative study in Spanish social education degree. Current Psychology, 43(20), 18065–18073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05556-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Mardiana, H. (2026). Examining learners' cognitive processes and learning emotions in digital game-based vocabulary learning: Evidence from eye-tracking technology and facial emotion recognition. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 23(2), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-10-2025-0321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Matthew, G., Pelser-Carstens, V., Bunt, L., & Bunt, B. (2025). Enhancing student engagement and knowledge retention through game-based learning: A comprehensive framework integrating game design and learning theories. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-Based Learning, 19(2), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecgbl.19.2.3873 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Ninaus, M., Greipl, S., Kiili, K., Lindstedt, A., Huber, S., Klein, E., Karnath, H.-O., & Moeller, K. (2019). Increased emotional engagement in game-based learning—A machine learning approach on facial emotion detection data. Computers & Education, 142, 103641. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Nwosu, K. C., Wahl, W. P., Anyanwu, A. N., Ezenwosu, N. E., & Okwuduba, E. N. (2023). Teachers' emotional intelligence as a predictor of their attitude, concerns and sentiments about inclusive education: Teacher professional-related factors as control variables. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 23(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12578 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Orr, L., & Weiner, N. (2025). Innovations and challenges in student engagement in higher education. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-6187-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Pandey, P. K., Chatterjee, A., Narang, S., & Pandey, P. K. (2025). Staying afloat through the balance of EI, resilience and student engagement: A student engagement model perspective. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 16(4), 446–470. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWOE.2025.150230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Pek, L. S., Yob, F. S. C., Nallisamy, V., Mee, R. W. M., Camara, J. S., & Anwar, C. (2025). Play, learn, grow: A decade of insights into gamified socio-emotional learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(6), 432–455. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.6.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Perera, H. N., & DiGiacomo, M. (2013). The relationship of trait emotional intelligence with academic performance: A meta-analytic review. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.08.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Ramírez-Asís, E. H., Maguiña, M. E., Infantes, S. E., & Naranjo-Toro, M. (2020). Emotional intelligence, competencies and performance of the university professor: Using the SEM-PLS partial least squares technique. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 23(3), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.6018/REIFOP.428261 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Reis da Silva, T. M. H. (2024). Emotional intelligence in higher education: Humanising technology for holistic student development. In Humanizing technology with emotional intelligence (pp. 117–139). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7011-7.ch007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Rodríguez-Ferrer, J. M., Manzano-León, A., & Aguilar-Parra, J. M. (2023). Game-based learning and service-learning to teach inclusive education in higher education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3285. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Rose, M., Antonaci, A., Bonnet, M., & Klemke, R. (2025). Learning success, engagement and fun: Evaluating an educational game in higher education as replacement for a homework assignment. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 16042, 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-02555-5_23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Santos, E., Ferreira, M., Ribeiro, C., Cardoso, A. P., Cunha, M., & Campos, S. (2023). Emotional intelligence in higher education students. Millenium: Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health, 2023(13). https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0213e.29759 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00001-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Seddighi-Khavidak, S., Sanchez, B. N., Chan, S. S. K., & Le-Chan, G. (2026). Game-based learning enhances engagement and comprehension in undergraduate architecture and biology education. Education Sciences, 16(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Sharmin, N., & Chow, A. K. (2026). Converting an entire course into a game by implementing gated pathways. Clinical Teacher, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.70334 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Sitompul, H., Sayekti, R., Saragih, S. R. D., & Salminawati. (2023). Exploring students' perception of Quizizz as a learning media in higher education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Squire, N. (2023). Undergraduate game-based student response systems (SRSs): A systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(4), 1903–1936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09655-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Thomas, C. L., & Allen, K. (2021). Driving engagement: Investigating the influence of emotional intelligence and academic buoyancy on student engagement. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1741520 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Titus, S., & Ng'Ambi, D. (2023). Digital gaming for cross-cultural learning: Development of a social constructivist game-based learning model at a South African university. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.331995 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Wu, Y., Bingzhi, Z., Wang, L., Ye, H., & Ruyang, L. (2025). Exploring the role of emotional intelligence in new teachers' approaches to educational inequality in low-resource schools. Education as Change, 29. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/18995 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Yeniasır, M., & Tekman, T. K. (2026). Overcoming barriers through games: Innovative language teaching in inclusive classrooms. Pedagogika, 160(4), 40–73. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2025.160.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Zhang, L., & Wang, X. (2026). The impact of emotional intelligence on emotional engagement in GAI-assisted learning: A moderated chain mediation model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07354-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Zhoc, K. C. H., King, R. B., Chung, T. S. H., & Chen, J. (2020). Emotionally intelligent students are more engaged and successful: Examining the role of emotional intelligence in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(4), 839–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00458-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Zhoc, K. C. H., King, R. B., Chung, T. S. H., Chen, J., & Yang, M. (2023). Emotional intelligence promotes optimal learning, engagement, and achievement: A mixed-methods study. Current Psychology, 42(12), 10387–10402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02294-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study