The Multidimensional Nature of Arabic Reading Comprehension: A Systematic Review of Pedagogy, Technology, Cognitive–Linguistic Factors, Text Features, and Assessment

Arabic reading comprehension is shaped by a complex interplay of instructional, technological, cognitive–linguistic, textual, and assessment-related factors. However, existing research has often examined these dimensions separately, limiting an integrated understanding of how they collectively influence reading development. This systematic literature review synthesised recent evidence on Arabic reading comprehension using the PRISMA approach. Searches conducted in Scopus and Web of Science identified 381 records published between 2021 and 2026, of which 21 studies met the final inclusion criteria and were subjected to quality appraisal and thematic analysis. Five major themes emerged: strategy-based and collaborative reading instruction; technology-enhanced reading and digital resources; linguistic, cognitive, and vocabulary predictors of reading; text characteristics, readability, and discourse processing; and teacher practices and literacy assessment. The findings show that Arabic reading comprehension is supported by strategic and collaborative approaches such as reciprocal teaching, skimming, metacognitive strategy use, and literature circles, while digital platforms, blended learning, and AI-generated resources are increasingly shaping reading instruction. Linguistic and cognitive factors, including phonological and morphological awareness, decoding, vocabulary, orthographic processing, memory, and executive functions, also play important roles in reading performance. Text genre, lexical characteristics, and readability further influence comprehension, whereas teacher practices and literacy assessment remain comparatively under-researched. Overall, the review highlights the need for an integrated approach that aligns instructional strategies, learner characteristics, text design, technology, teacher expertise, and assessment. Future research should prioritise longitudinal and mixed-method studies, validated literacy assessments, diverse learner populations, and the long-term effects of AI-supported Arabic reading instruction.

Arabic reading comprehension, reading strategies, educational technology, cognitive–linguistic factors, literacy assessment

1. Albilali, E., Al-Twairesh, N., & Hosny, M. (2022). Constructing Arabic reading comprehension datasets: Arabic WikiReading and KaifLematha. Language Resources and Evaluation, 56(3), 729–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-022-09577-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali Al-Hirsh, S. M., & Alslaiti, F. M. (2024). Using the brainstorming strategy to develop Arabic reading comprehension for seventh-grade students in Jordan [استخدام استراتيجية العصف الذهني في تطوير فهم المقروء باللغة العربية لطلبة الصف السابع في الأردن]. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 51(3), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i3.2461 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alkasasbeh, K. A., Alramamneh, Y. M., Kasasbeh, N. A., Almajdoub, Z., & Hussien, A. (2025). Cultivating critical reading skills in a cultural context: Investigating reciprocal teaching in Arabic language education. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 13(2), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2025.2063162.4075 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alkhazaleh, M., & Abu Sal, A. (2024). Impact of using mind maps to improve reading comprehension skills of eighth-grade students. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.10222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Allaithy, A., & Zaki, M. (2025). Evaluation of AI-generated reading comprehension materials for Arabic language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2474037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Almazroui, K. (2026). Recontextualizing literature circles for Arabic literacy classrooms: A human-centred approach to fostering belonging. Journal of Research in Reading, 49(3), Article e70034. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.70034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Almsaiden, A. H. I., Hussein, T. A., & Al Njadat, E. N. (2025). The effect of mental perseverance strategy for teaching Arabic language for developing reading comprehension and divergent thinking skills among first-year literary secondary school students. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 14(1), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v14n1p215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Altamimi, D. H. (2024). Phonological awareness and reading ability: Exploring the connection between phonological skills and reading proficiency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(9), 2929–2939. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1409.28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Amin, A., & Gottardo, A. (2022). The Simple View of Reading: Language-specific and contextual characteristics related to Arabic speakers in Saudi Arabia and Canada. Learning and Individual Differences, 100, Article 102231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102231 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bishara, S. (2022). Association between phonological and morphological awareness and reading comprehension among special-education children in Arab elementary schools. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(4), 1105–1122. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1737319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hassanein, E. E. A., Johnson, E. S., Alshaboul, Y., Ibrahim, S., Megreya, A., Al-Hendawi, M., & Al-Attiyah, A. (2021). Developing a test of early Arabic literacy skills. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888349 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hassanein, E. E. A., Johnson, E. S., Ibrahim, S., & Alshaboul, Y. (2023). What predicts word reading in Arabic? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1077643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077643 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ismail, M. F., & Yusoff, N. M. R. N. (2021). Language learning strategies and readability of Form Four KBD Arabic textbooks. Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning, 4(3), 750–764. https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v4i3.12227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction–integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Makhoul, B., & Olshtein, E. (2026). Blended learning as a tool for promoting academic literacy in Arabic: Effects on students with different ability levels. Education Sciences, 16(4), Article 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16040530 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nurhadi, & Abidin, M. (2025). Skimming technique to enhance students’ comprehension of Arabic texts in the Test of Arabic as a Foreign Language. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 2025(5), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2025.5.24 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Omar, R. A. A., Rababah, N. Y., Ta’amneh, I., Al-Qeyam, F. R., Al-Ghazo, A., Aljarrah, K. M. F., & Wardat, D. W. S. (2026). The impact of the Conker digital chunking platform on Arabic reading comprehension among eighth-grade students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 16(7), 2228–2238. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1607.06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Razkane, H., Sayeh, A. Y., Diouny, S., & Yeou, M. (2023). Eleventh-grade students’ use of metacognitive reading strategies in Arabic (L1) and English (L3). International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16132a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rusli, R. K., Martin, A. Y., Lathifah, Z. K., Monaya, N., & Yakşi, M. (2024). The impact of informative and narrative texts on Arabic language comprehension in Islamic education. International Journal of Language Education, 8(4), 795–806. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i4.70009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Tarabya, B. M., & Khateb, A. (2026). On the linguistic and cognitive factors that predict reading abilities among Arabic-speaking university students. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 55(3), Article 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-026-10238-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Telfah, A. M., & Al-Hawamdah, M. F. (2023). Arabic teachers’ evaluation degree of their reading teaching strategies and practices. Information Sciences Letters, 12(3), 1161–1172. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/120307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wolsey, T. D., Karkouti, I. M., Hiebert, E. H., El Seoud, D. A., Abadzi, H., & Abdelkhalek, F. (2023). Texts for reading instruction and the most common words in Modern Standard Arabic: An investigation. Reading and Writing, 36(7), 1567–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10307-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study