Undergraduates' Readiness and Confidence in Workplace English Communication: The Influence of English Learning Background, Workplace Exposure and Self-Perceived Proficiency
Authors
Siti Nor Azim bt Zainal Abidin
Learning Institute for Empowerment (LIfE), Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia, (Malaysia)
Learning Institute for Empowerment (LIfE), Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia, (Malaysia)
Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102100181
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/21 | Page No: 2199-2218
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-05
Accepted: 2026-09-10
Published: 2026-10-06
Abstract
Effective workplace communication in English has become an essential employability skill in today's globalised labour market. Despite increasing emphasis on communication skills development in higher education, concerns remain regarding graduates' preparedness for professional communication. This study examined undergraduates' readiness for workplace English communication, their confidence in performing workplace communication tasks, and the relationship between selected influencing factors and workplace communication readiness. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed involving 70 undergraduate students from a local university. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire measuring workplace English communication readiness, workplace communication confidence, English learning background, workplace exposure, and self-perceived English proficiency. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's product-moment correlation analyses were conducted using SPSS. The findings revealed that respondents demonstrated a high level of workplace English communication readiness (M = 3.99, SD = 0.88) and a high level of confidence in performing workplace communication tasks (M = 3.92, SD = 0.91). Written communication tasks, particularly email writing and email responses, recorded the highest confidence levels, while oral presentations received the lowest confidence rating. Correlation analysis indicated that English learning background (r = .373, p = .001), workplace exposure (r = .248, p = .038), and self-perceived English proficiency (r = .438, p < .001) were all significantly related to workplace English communication readiness. Self-perceived English proficiency demonstrated the strongest relationship with readiness. The findings suggest that higher education institutions should strengthen workplace-oriented communication training, particularly in spoken communication, while increasing opportunities for authentic workplace experiences to enhance graduate employability and workplace preparedness.
Keywords
workplace English communication, workplace readiness, communication confidence, self-perceived English proficiency, workplace exposure, graduate employability, undergraduates
Downloads
References
1. Ali, Z., Bhar, S. K., Mahmood, S., Mokhtar, R., & Mohd Ali, A. Z. (2025). Reforming English for employability: Insights from employers and graduates in a Malaysian context. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(9), 801-816. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10249 [journals.b...bgroup.com] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Azhari, M. A., & Satimin, O. (2024). Evaluating English language education for career readiness in intercultural communication: Employer insights and recommendations. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(10), 2923-2934. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100245 [rsisintern...tional.org] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chakiso, Z. T., Bushisso, E. W., & Wanna, W. (2025). Unveiling predictive validity of English language exam on student achievement: Mediated by self-rated English proficiency. Language Testing in Asia, 15, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00356-x [CHAKISO ET. A;. 2025 | PDF] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chan, C. S. C. (2021). University graduates’ transition into the workplace: How they learn to use English for work and cope with language-related challenges. System, 100, 102530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102530 [CHAN 2021 | PDF] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2022). How to design and evaluate research in education (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Jackson, D., & Bridgstock, R. (2021). What actually works to enhance graduate employability? The relative value of curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular learning and paid work. Higher Education, 81(4), 723-739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00570-x [link.springer.com], [eprints.qut.edu.au] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kamil, M. A., & Muhammad, A. M. (2021). Professional communication competence in English for occupational purposes (EOP) courses: A systematic literature review and proposal of a framework. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 12(2), 260-278. [eric.ed.gov], [ojs.deakin.edu.au] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Li, T., & Zhang, Y. (2021). The construct of English competence and test design for non-English major postgraduates. English Language Teaching, 14(1), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n1p58 [LI AND ZHANG 2021 | PDF] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Peersia, K., Rappa, N. A., & Perry, L. B. (2024). Work readiness: Definitions and conceptualisations. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(8), 1830-1845. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2366322 [researchpo...och.edu.au], [eric.ed.gov] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ting, S. H., Marzuki, E., Chuah, K. M., Misieng, J., & Jerome, C. (2017). Employers' views on importance of English proficiency and communication skill for employability in Malaysia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8132 [ir.unimas.my], [vm36.upi.edu] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Vlachopoulos, D., & Pachni Tsitiridou, O. (2026). Preparing university graduates for the labour market through employability skills development and university-industry collaboration: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 16(3), Article 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030426 [pure.eur.nl], [pure.eur.nl] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Wahi, W. (2014). English language literacy: Juxtaposing undergraduate students’ competencies with workplace requirements. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 1, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v1.237 [journal.ump.edu.my], [journal.ump.edu.my] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/ [www3.weforum.org], [weforum.org] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study