Digital Tools for Enhancing Oral Presentation Skills in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

Siti Fauziana Zakaria

Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknoloogi Mara, Shah Alam Selangor, Malaysia. (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102100186

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/21 | Page No: 2274-2290

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-03

Accepted: 2026-08-08

Published: 2026-10-07

Abstract

With the rapid development of digital technology, oral presentation skills in higher education have changed dramatically. There have been many attempts to develop digital tools to support learners' presentation skills, but the literature is still scattered in terms of the technologies developed, pedagogical strategies, and learning environments. This systematic literature review (SLR) brings together the existing research pertaining to the use of digital tools for the development of oral presentation skills in higher education. A systematic search was conducted in the Scopus and WOS database following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After the identification, screening, eligibility and inclusion processes, 41 empirical studies were selected and analysed from 2016 to 2026. Six criteria were established to assess the methodological rigour of the included studies, which were then subject to a quality assessment. Thematic analysis revealed four themes: (1) AI-supported, automated and mobile support of oral communication; (2) video-, audio- and multimodal-based oral presentation learning; (3) Web 2.0, social, hybrid and collaborative learning environments; and (4) new technologies and contextual factors affecting the development of oral presentation. The results show that the use of digital tools overall has a positive impact on the oral presentation performance, communication confidence, learner autonomy, engagement and opportunities for self and peer feedback of learners. In the area of personalised feedback, as well as repeated practice, AI-enabled apps and multimodal technologies stood out. Yet issues of digital literacy, ethics in AI applications, access, teacher workload and sustainability of technology integration are all underdeveloped. This review summarises recent research trends, pinpoints gaps in the literature, and brings practical implications for higher education educators, curriculum designers, and researchers who want to incorporate digital technologies into the teaching and learning of oral presentations

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Digital Tools, Higher Education, Oral Presentation, Systematic Literature Review

Downloads

References

1. Aceron, R. M. (2026). Social media dependency and English-speaking performance in mock job interviews among Filipino pre-service teachers in an inclusive university context. International Journal of Special Education, 41(4S), 638–647. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aeni, N., Alsbbagh, Y. A. M. R., Taufik, M., Patandung, Y., Kurnia, R., Muthmainnah, & Wijayanti, T. (2025). AI chatbots in oral communication for higher education students: Threats or opportunities. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1299, 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3358-6_12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Agustina, L., Maulidiyah, F., & Dja’far, V. H. (2026). Comprehensive English learning model: Integrating digital storytelling for vocabulary and communication enhancement. English Learning Innovation, 7(2), 470-492.https://doi.org/10.22219/englie.v7i2.44430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ali, L. F., & Nauman, S. (2026). Addressing public speaking anxiety: A pedagogical action research approach. Educational Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2026.2664802 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-khresheh, M. H., Demirkol Orak, S., & Alruwaili, S. F. (2025). The development of language proficiency through global skills enhancement using Web 2.0 tools in university EFL contexts: A mixed methods quasi-experimental study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 931. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05210-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Asensio-Martínez, A., Aguilar-Latorre, A., Oliván-Blázquez, B., Fernández-Del-Río, E., Samper-Pardo, M., & Bartolomé, C. (2025). Creating educational podcasts as an expository methodology for active learning and its relationship with satisfaction: A comparative study with live oral presentations. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(3), 896–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2386031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28), 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Barrett, N. E., Liu, G. Z., & Wang, H. C. (2022). Student perceptions of a mobile learning application for English oral presentations: The case of EOPA. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2476–2501. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1881975 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dascalu, C. G., Antohe, M. E., Topoliceanu, C., David, C., & Purcarea, V. L. (2023). Efficacy of blended learning techniques in medical and dental education: Students’ opinions in relation to their habits as internet consumers. Applied Sciences, 13(13), Article 7795. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137795 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Geathers, J., Alvero, A. J., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2025). ChitterChatter: Curriculum-aligned AI speaking partners for language learning classrooms. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 346–350). https://doi.org/10.1145/3698205.3733953 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gutiérrez-Porlán, I., Prendes-Espinosa, P., & Sánchez-Vera, M. D. (2022). Digital technologies for the assessment of oral English skills. Applied Sciences, 12(22), Article 11635. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211635 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hasan, A. (2026). Transforming language learning: Examining the role of Yoodli AI in developing oral skills among first-year undergraduates. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1806, 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-16389-9_41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hsu, P. Y. (2021). Academic use of social networking technology for English learning: Implementing videotaped peer evaluation into English speech class. In ACM International Conference Proceedings (pp. 248–253). https://doi.org/10.1145/3450148.3450159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ionițiu, I. (2024). Practicing speaking skills in the ESP context to prepare students for their careers. Analele Universitatii Ovidius Constanta, Seria Filologie, 35(1), 291–304. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ipatov, O., Barinova, D., Andreeva, A., Odinokaya, M., & Krylova, E. (2024). Implementation of an AI-powered language assistant for enhancing engineering students' communicative proficiency through mobile technologies. Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings of the International DAAAM Symposium, 35(1), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.2507/35th.daaam.proceedings.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jackson, D. (2014). Business graduate performance in oral communication skills and strategies for improvement. The International Journal of Management Education, 12(1), 22-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Johnson, M. (2023). New technologies and changing pedagogy: Incorporating GoReact to improve student oral presentations. In IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) (pp. 222–226). https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kirkgöz, Y. (2011). A blended learning study on implementing video recorded speaking tasks in task-based classroom instruction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lee, S. S., & Azman, H. (2021). Integrating Facebook as a Web 2.0 tool in a responsive pedagogy for multimodal oral presentation skills. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(3), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2103-06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lee, Y. J. J., Chen, L. Y., & Lee, M. H. (2016). Developing an online system to evaluate EFL college students' voice performance in English public speaking. International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 23(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0144/CGP/v23i02/1-13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lui, A. K. F., Ng, S. C., & Wong, W. W. (2015). A novel mobile application for training oral presentation delivery skills. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 559, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48978-9_8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (EBSE Technical Report No. EBSE-2007-01, Version 2.3). Keele University and University of Durham. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Matyakhan, T. (2026). Vlogging as learning-oriented assessment: Impacts on Thai EFL university students’ oral communication ability and mindset. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 15(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v15n2p164 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Moolman, J. H., Edgar, M., Boyle, F., & Walsh, J. (2024). Integrating immersive technology solutions in engineering education at university level. In SEFI 2024 Conference Proceedings (pp. 1910–1919). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14256939 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mouhammad, N., Schneider, J., Klemke, R., & Di Mitri, D. (2025). From nervous to noteworthy: Evaluating SPEAKS, an educational software for speech content. In Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning (pp. 271–280). https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.24.1.4104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Musliadi, M., Triyono, S., & Jamilah, J. (2024). Enhancing speaking agility: Unveiling Indonesian lecturers' hybrid teaching experiences in oral communication skills. Language Learning in Higher Education, 14(2), 401–433. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2024-0018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. New London Group. (1996). The pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Niitsu, K., Kondo, A., Hua, J., & Dyba, N. A. (2023). A case report of collaborative online international learning in nursing and health studies between the United States and Japan. Nursing Education Perspectives, 44(3), 196–197. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000974 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ochoa Alpala, C. A., & Ortíz García, W. R. (2018). Creating machinima (3D) and real-life videos in an ESP classroom. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n1.59412 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Medicina Fluminensis, 57(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.21860/medflum2021_264903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Pravitha, C. W., Retnaningdyah, P., & Widyastuti. (2026). Digital storytelling, communication anxiety, and English learning motivation among Indonesian EFL students: A pre–post intervention study. International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture, 13(5), e2026-1314. https://doi.org/10.61838/ijbmc.v13i5.1314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Robillos, R. J. (2022). Impact of LoiLooNote digital mapping on university students' oral presentation skills and critical thinking dispositions. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15228a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sandoval Zapata, M. M., & Díaz Larenas, C. (2020). Podcast-based lessons: A useful tool to improve university students’ descriptive oral skills. Revista Comunicación, 29(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.18845/rc.v29i1-2020.5260 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Schampheleer, I., Macken, L., & De Wilde, V. (2026). Dictionaries, DeepL, and ChatGPT: Comparing language tool effects on L2 English speaking and learner perceptions. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, 15, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sharma Yadav, M. (2025). English Speaking Practice: Tools & Technology. Available at SSRN 6432818. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Shumeiko, N. V., & Osadcha, K. P. (2024). Application of artificial intelligence in higher education institutions for developing soft skills of future specialists in the sphere of information technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2871(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2871/1/012027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Sinclair, S. (2016). The introduction and refinement of the assessment of digitally recorded audio presentations. Open Learning, 31(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1190640 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Smith, C. M., & Sodano, T. M. (2011). Integrating lecture capture as a teaching strategy to improve student presentation skills through self-assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(3), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411415082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Villamizar, A. G., & Mejía, G. (2019). Fostering learner autonomy and critical reflection through digital video-journals in a university foreign language course. Reflective Practice, 20(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1575195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Vu, V. B., & Hà, T. A. (2026). The use of generative AI tools by EFL university students for L2 oral presentations: A mixed methods study. London Review of Education, 24(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.24.1.10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Yeh, H. C. (2018). Exploring the perceived benefits of the process of multimodal video making in developing multiliteracies. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 28–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles