Towards an Integrated Perspective on Inclusive Pedagogy through a Bibliometric and Conceptual Synthesis of Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy and Universal Design for Learning

Authors

Nur ‘Amirah Mhd Noh

Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia, (Malaysia)

Hikmah Kamarudin

Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia, (Malaysia)

Aidatul Fadzlin Bakri

Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia, (Malaysia)

Zarina Alias

Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia, (Malaysia)

Nor Fadila Kasim

Faculty of Sport Science and Coaching, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.102100189

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/21 | Page No: 2310-2326

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-07

Accepted: 2026-08-13

Published: 2026-10-07

Abstract

Inclusive education requires pedagogical approaches that address both the cultural diversity of learners and structural barriers to participation. This study examines the development and emerging convergence of Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy (CSP) and Universal Design for Learning (UDL), two influential frameworks that have largely evolved through distinct scholarly traditions. A bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed literature was conducted using performance analysis and science mapping, including publication trends, source distributions, country co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, and co-citation analysis. The findings reveal contrasting but complementary trajectories: CSP has expanded rapidly through scholarship centred on cultural identity, equity, and social justice, whereas UDL has developed more cumulatively through accessibility, learner variability, and inclusive instructional design. Keyword and co-citation networks further indicate increasing intellectual connections between the two traditions while retaining their distinct theoretical foundations. The study argues that this convergence represents an emerging integrated perspective on inclusive pedagogy in which CSP contributes cultural legitimacy and epistemic justice, while UDL contributes structural accessibility and proactive barrier reduction. Future research should empirically examine this integration across diverse educational contexts, particularly technology-enhanced and AI-mediated learning environments.

Keywords

Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy; Universal Design for Learning; inclusive pedagogy; bibliometric analysis

Downloads

References

1. Alim, H. S., Paris, D., & Wong, C. P. (2020). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy (p. 261). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774977-18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ballantyne, E., Lin, M. P. C., Chang, D. H., & Poitras, E. (2025). Bridging educational equity gaps: expanding the CHAT-ACTS framework for personalized GenAI chatbots in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 37(4), 1564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09475-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bucheli, M. G. V., Gómez-Galán, J., Mesa, M. L. C., & López-Catálan, L. (2024). Digital technologies as enablers of universal design for learning: higher education students’ perceptions in the context of SDG4. Discover Sustainability, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00699-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Budnyk, O. (2023). (Un) Critical pedagogy: Current priorities and prospects of development. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.10.1.7-23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bulut, A. (2025). Journal of ‘Computers & Education’ from Past to Present: Bibliomeric Analysis (1978-2025). Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(26), 1038. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1662250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Canter, L. L. S., King, L., Williams, J. B., Metcalf, D., & Potts, K. R. M. (2017). Evaluating pedagogy and practice of universal design for learning in public schools. Exceptionality Education International, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v27i1.7743 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dalton, E., Lyner‐Cleophas, M., Ferguson, B. T., & McKenzie, J. (2019). Inclusion, universal design and universal design for learning in higher education: South Africa and the United States. African Journal of Disability, 8. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dunham, S. J., Cifranick, K., Bales, C., & Hixon, M. D. (2024). Sustaining indigenous ways of being: Creating culturally sustaining spaces in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 25(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491221147573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Esteban‐Guitart, M., Lalueza, J. L., Zhang-Yu, C., & Llopart, M. (2019). Sustaining students’ cultures and identities. A qualitative study based on the funds of knowledge and identity approaches. Sustainability, 11(12), 3400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fovet, F. (2021). Developing an ecological approach to the strategic implementation of UDL in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(4), 27. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n4p27 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Garrad, T., & Nolan, H. (2022). Rethinking Higher Education Unit Design: Embedding Universal Design for Learning in online studies. Student Success, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.2300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gilmore, J., & Browne, F. (2025). Embedding universal design for learning in nursing education: An audit of inclusive practice in Ireland. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2025.10.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Verstichele, M., & Andries, C. (2017). Higher education students with disabilities speaking out: perceived barriers and opportunities of the Universal Design for Learning framework. Disability & Society, 32(10), 1627. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1365695 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hanesworth, P., Bracken, S., & Elkington, S. (2018). A typology for a social justice approach to assessment: learning from universal design and culturally sustaining pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1465405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jones, L., Durham, C., & Cataneo, A. (2021). Rising to the challenge: Preparing pre-service teachers during a global pandemic. The New Educator, 17(4), 375. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688x.2021.1991538 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Marshall, S. A. (2023). But what does it look like in Maths? International Journal of Multicultural Education, 25(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v25i1.3251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Muzdalifah, F., Kurniawati, F., Siahaan, F. M. M., Setiamurti, A., Levyadi, J., Bracken, S., & Martono, W. C. (2025). Factors influencing faculty members’ implementation of universal design for learning in higher education: A systematic Review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2513540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12441244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Terrell, K. L. & Silva Pimentel, D. (Eds.). (2026). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies in Mathematics and Technology Education: Research, Practices, and Critical Reflections. IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Thompson, M. (2019). Early childhood pedagogy in a socio-cultural medley in Ghana: Case studies in kindergarten. International Journal of Early Childhood, 51(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-019-00242-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wahyuni, S., Pantiwati, Y., Sunaryo, H., In’am, A., & Bastian, A. (2025). Strategizing universal design for learning (UDL) implementation: Enhancing inclusive education for students with disabilities in higher education. AL-ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Waitoller, F. R., & Thorius, K. K. (2016). Cross-pollinating Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy and Universal Design for Learning: Toward an inclusive pedagogy that accounts for dis/ability. Harvard Educational Review, 86(3), 366. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-86.3.366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zhang, L., Carter, R. A., & Lim, S. N. (2025). Designing intelligent agents for students with disabilities: Promoting inclusion and equity through the lens of cultural-historical activity theory. Journal of Special Education Technology. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434251349405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles