Making Hybrid Work Work: A Job Demands–Resources Perspective Among Language Lecturers

Hybrid work is no longer simply a legacy of the COVID-19 period. It is becoming part of how organisations think about flexibility, continuity and the organisation of professional work. This shift is especially visible in Malaysia. During the 2026 West Asia crisis, measures within the higher education portfolio included targeted working from home and greater use of hybrid meetings; this was followed by the introduction of Hybrid Work Day for eligible public-service employees. Such developments make hybrid work a timely issue for universities, but they do not by themselves establish that it works equally well for every type of academic work. Language lecturers, for example, move between highly interactive responsibilities such as teaching, consultation and collaborative work, and tasks that require sustained concentration, including marking, lesson preparation, research and writing. Using Job Demands–Resources (JD–R) theory, this concept paper develops a framework for examining hybrid work effectiveness among language lecturers at the Academy of Language Studies (APB), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Shah Alam. The framework brings together four demands—workload, technostress, professional isolation and work–family conflict—and four resources—work autonomy, technological support, organisational support and home-workspace suitability. Three objectives guide the paper: to identify the demands and resources relevant to lecturers' hybrid work, to examine their relationship with hybrid work effectiveness, and to develop a JD–R-based framework for this occupational setting. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design is proposed, with a questionnaire survey followed by semi-structured interviews. By locating hybrid work within the actual mix of tasks undertaken by language lecturers, the paper offers a context-sensitive basis for thinking about how universities can design flexible work arrangements that remain workable, supportive and sustainable

Hybrid Work, Job Demands–Resources Theory, Language Lecturers, Higher Education, Work Effectiveness

1. Azizan, M., Shafie, H., Mohd Jaafar, N., Komarudin, N. E., & Samud, N. N. (2024). Burnout in the hybrid workplace: Examining the struggle of language lecturers in Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 9(2), 577–602. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol9iss2pp577-602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, 630, 920–925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38(6), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678503800604 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2023). Job demands–resources theory in times of crises: New propositions. Organizational Psychology Review, 13(3), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221135022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012722 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam Malaysia. (2026). Ceraian SR.4.1.3: Dasar Hari Bekerja Hibrid. In Pekeliling Perkhidmatan Sumber Manusia: Waktu bekerja. https://docs.jpa.gov.my/docs/myppsm/PPSM/SR/Waktu-bekerja/Knight, C., McLarnon, M. J. W., Olaru, D., Lee, J. A., & Parker, S. K. (2025). Hybrid work design profiles: Antecedents and well-being outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 162, 104174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2025.104174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Minhat, H. S., & Wan Ghazali, W. S. (2024). Remote working and wellbeing of the female academicians during the COVID-19 Movement Control Order enforcement (MCO) in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 24(1), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.24/no.1/art.2061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2026, April 9). Persediaan hadapi impak krisis Asia Barat: KPT gerakkan tujuh langkah penjimatan dan tekankan kebajikan pelajar. https://www.mohe.gov.my/hebahan/sorotan-aktiviti/persediaan-hadapi-impak-krisis-asia-barat-kpt-gerakkan-tujuh-langkah-penjimatan-dan-tekankan-kebajikan-pelajarNavas-Martín, M. Á., Meseguer Gancedo, P., & Cuerdo-Vilches, T. (2026). Working from home and indoor environmental quality: A transdisciplinary questionnaire design based on a Delphi study. Frontiers in Built Environment, 12, 1753144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2026.1753144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wang, Q., & Yao, N. (2025). Understanding the impact of technology usage at work on academics' psychological well-being: A perspective of technostress. BMC Psychology, 13, 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02461-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study