The Over-Reliance Dilemma: Evaluating the Impact Of 100% Generative AI Utilization on Higher Education Student Assignment Quality and Critical Thinking

The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education has fundamentally altered student learning behaviors and academic workflow dynamics. While AI tools offer unprecedented advantages in information synthesis and writing efficiency, a growing subset of tertiary students exhibits near-total dependence—approaching 100% utilization—on AI tools to generate coursework submissions. This mixed-methods study investigates the motivations, output quality, and cognitive ramifications associated with near-total AI dependency in academic assignments among undergraduate students (N = 180). Data were gathered through structured questionnaires, qualitative student focus groups, and an expert-evaluated comparative analysis of fully AI-generated coursework versus human-guided assignments. The findings reveal that while total AI reliance yields structural fluency and high linguistic correctness, it significantly dampens higher-order critical thinking, original argumentative depth, and long-term skill acquisition. Furthermore, driving factors include severe time poverty, assessment anxiety, and unclear institutional guidelines regarding ethical AI integration. This paper offers practical recommendations for educators to redesign assessment models, foster authentic cognitive engagement, and establish balanced digital literacy frameworks.

Generative Artificial Intelligence, Over-Reliance in Higher Education, Student Assessments, Academic Integrity, Critical Thinking Skills

1. Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to write and writing to learn in an age of artificial intelligence. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1420–1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2219362 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Dawson, P. (2021). Defending Assessment Security in a Digital World: Addressing Cheating in the Digital Age. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Lodge, J. M., Yang, S., Furze, A., & Dawson, P. (2023). Assessment integrity? Artificial intelligence generative models, higher education, and the problem of cognitive offloading. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-0023-10228-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023). Assigning AI: Seven approaches for using AI in the class. SSRN Electronic Journal, Article 4392610. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4392610 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Selwyn, N. (2022). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study