Business Model Board Games as Experiential Tools for Entrepreneurial Learning: Global Bibliometric Evidence and Future Directions

The present study explores the pedagogical contribution of Business Model Board Games to entrepreneurship education as an experiential tool. The BMBGs immerse learners in a safe, simulated decision-making environment to practice recognising opportunities, allocating resources, and planning strategically across various domains. Specifically, the study seeks to 1. Map the intellectual and thematic structure of academic research on BMBG from 1991 to 2024 and 2. Synthesise empirical insights on their utility for promoting cognitive, behavioural, and attitudinal learning outcomes. The bibliometric analysis employed the academic search hub AnswerThis.io, which provides indexed content from academic databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, SpringerLink, and Emerald Insight. A total of 246 publications were processed through VOSviewer and Biblioshiny to ascertain publication trends, citation dynamics, and keyword clusters. The descriptive and thematic indicators, including the total publications, citation frequency, h-index, and keyword co-occurrence, mapped the field’s intellectual structure. The findings indicate a near-explosive rise in publication outputs from 2015 to 2018, with two major citation peaks in 2007 and 2017 corresponding to two seminal works on experiential learning and serious game design. The thematic mapping advised a structural faculty consisting of four overlapping clusters: 1. Experiential learning and simulation design, 2. Motivation and flow engagement, 3. Community-based and collaborative learning, and 4. Digital inclusion and hybrid learning. These publication trends signify a paradigm shift from conventional, lecture-style education to technology-infused, interactive learning environments. The empirical synthesis argues that BMBG consistently favors cognitive development, behavioral aids, and attitudinal results, notwithstanding the gender-sensitive outlook, responsive design, and longitudinal studies to confirm the knowledge retention capacity. Finally, this study contributes to the adventitious literature on experiential entrepreneurship education by setting BMBGs as a cost-effective, context-driven competence-promotion tool for reflective play and social learning, fostering the learning-application chasm for entrepreneurial competency.

Business Model Board Games; Entrepreneurship Education; Experiential Learning

1. Almeida, F. (2017). Experience with entrepreneurship learning using serious games. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(2), 69–80. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1146959 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almeida, F., & Simoes, J. (2019). The role of serious games, gamification and Industry 4.0 tools in the Education 4.0 paradigm. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.554469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bellotti, F., Berta, R., & De Gloria, A. (2014). Serious games for education and training. International Journal of Serious Games, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v1i1.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bellotti, F., Berta, R., & De Gloria, A. (2019). Serious games in education and training: Opportunities and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bhutto, A. (2024). Gamification in entrepreneurship education: Motivation, engagement, and inclusivity. Social Sciences and Pedagogical Research Journal, 4(2), 45–58.https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-08-2023-0402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Casau, P., Ferreira Dias, J., & Amorim, M. (2024). Entrepreneurship and game-based learning in higher education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). The digital transformation of entrepreneurship education. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 190, 122420.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10309-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Garbuio, M., Dong, A., Lin, N., & Lovallo, D. (2018). Design thinking and entrepreneurship education: Theoretical perspectives and practical implications. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hsu, C.-L., Chang, K.-C., & Lin, K.-Y. (2022). Exploring flow and learning satisfaction in gamified learning environments. Computers & Education, 184, 104479. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kolb, D. A., & Kolb, A. Y. (2018). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic approach to learning and development. Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lameras, P., et al. (2022). Learning in immersive simulations: Situated cognition in entrepreneurship. Computers & Education, 181, 104445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lameras, P., Arnab, S., de Freitas, S., Draper, P., Pettersson, P., & Baldiris, S. (2017). Essential features of serious games design in higher education: Linking learning attributes to game mechanics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 972–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ranchhod, A., Gurău, C., & Loukis, E. (2021). Serious games and experiential entrepreneurship learning: Insights from European higher education. Education + Training, 63(8/9), 1194–1211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rauch, A., & Hulsink, W. (2015). Putting entrepreneurship education where the intention to act lies: An investigation into the impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial behaviour. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0293 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rojas-Lamorena, Á. J., García, F. J., & Puente, J. (2022). Mapping research trends in game-based learning and entrepreneurship education: A bibliometric review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(12), 17193–17216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rosli, M., Khairudin, M., & Mat Saat, R. (2019). Gamification in entrepreneurship and accounting education. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 25(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2019.100308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sánchez, J. C., Ward, A., Hernández, B., & Florez, J. L. (2022). Simulation-based entrepreneurship education: Systematic review and future directions. Journal of Small Business Management, 60(4), 733–758. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2021-0212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organisation. Organisational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study