The Use of Dhomir in Paired Communication

Authors

Muhammad Irfan Bin Mhd Rusdi

Senior Lecturer, Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Ibrahim Bin Abdullah

Senior Lecturer, Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Farriz Azzuan Bin Amat Supria

Lecturer, Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Muhammad Syaffiq Bin Mohammed Raffi

Lecturer, Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam (Malaysia)

Abdulhadee Sabuding

Asst. Prof. Faculty of Islamic Science, Prince of Songkla University, (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.924ILEIID0032

Subject Category: Language

Volume/Issue: 9/24 | Page No: 294-302

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-09-23

Accepted: 2025-09-30

Published: 2025-10-30

Abstract

Mastery of the Arabic language in communication represents a crucial skill in reflecting an individual’s ability to employ it in conversation. This study aims to assess the level of understanding regarding the use of dhomir (pronouns) in paired communication among Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) students enrolled in the Teaching Arabic Communicative course. The study employed a quantitative research design, with data collected through questionnaires distributed to students following two-way paired conversation activities. A total of 195 respondents, comprising undergraduates from various years of study, participated in the survey. The findings indicate that, although the majority of students understood the meaning of dhomir, they continued to encounter difficulties in identifying its application within conversations as well as in using it accurately. This highlights the need for more frequent paired practice. The primary challenges identified include confusion in selecting the appropriate dhomir when applying contextual usage related to gender, number, and changes in nouns and verbs. Accordingly, the study recommends the adoption of interactive communication activities as a more effective approach in teaching dhomir. This includes frequent communicative exercises and greater emphasis on its application within conversational practice. The implications of this study underscore the importance of paired and group communication exercises, as well as role-play simulations, in the learning process. Ultimately, this research contributes to the teaching and learning of Arabic by emphasizing the practical integration of grammatical elements into communication.

Keywords

Dhomir, komunikasi berpasangan, kefahaman

Downloads

References

1. Abu Bakar Hamid & Ainon Mohd. (1993). Komunikasi Berkesan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1980). The Concept of Education in Islam: A Framework for an Islamic Philosophy of Education. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Ghalayini, M. (2005). Jami’ al-Durus al-‘Arabiyyah (Vol. 1). Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Quran dan Terjemahan (2022). “Penggunaan Kata Ganti dalam Al-Quran.” Laman Web Quran Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Sulaiman, N. (2020). Oral grammar drills and their effect on Arabic learners’ sentence structure. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 8(1), 23–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alhawary, M. T. (2011). Modern Standard Arabic grammar: A learner’s guide. Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Asmah Haji Omar. (1993). Susur Galur Bahasa Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Asmah Haji Omar. (2008). Nahu Keterangan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Aziz, M. A. (2015). The impact of context on the correct use of Arabic pronouns. Arab World English Journal, 6(4), 113–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hassan, A., & Mohamed, M. (2018). Kaedah Pengajaran Bahasa Arab: Pendekatan dan Strategi. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hassan, R., & Al-Khatib, M. (2018). Teaching Arabic in higher education: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, 3(2), 65–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties (Rev. ed.). Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Institut Terjemahan dan Buku Malaysia (2021). “Panduan Penggunaan Kata Ganti Nama dalam Bahasa Arab.” https://www.itbm.com.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kamus Dewan Perdana (2020). “Dhomir.” Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. https://www.dbp.gov.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mahmoud, A. (2017). Common grammatical errors among non-native Arabic learners: A case study. Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 12(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mat Saad, N. S., & Abdul Majid, M. (2016). “Cabaran Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab sebagai Bahasa Kedua di Malaysia.” Jurnal Linguistik Malaysia, 10(2), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nik Safiah Karim, Farid M. Onn, Hashim Haji Musa, & Abdul Hamid Mahmood. (2008). Tatabahasa Dewan (Edisi Ketiga). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nor, N. H. M., Hussain, E. M., & Abdullah, A. R. (2019). “Kesopanan dalam Komunikasi Menerusi Filem Animasi Kanak-Kanak Tempatan.” Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(4), 368-385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Omar, A. H. (2009). “Pemahaman Dhomir dalam Kalangan Pelajar: Kajian Kes di Universiti Malaysia.” Jurnal Bahasa & Linguistik, 5(1), 25-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Omar, N., & Ali, S. M. (2021). “Komunikasi Bukan Lisan dalam Konteks Kehadiran Sosial di Ruang Maya.” Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(4), 247-263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rahman, A., & Wahid, M. (2017). “Analisis Kesalahan Penggunaan Dhomir dalam Penulisan Bahasa Arab.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Arabic Studies, 45-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Roslan, M. H., & Ismail, Z. (2020). “Keberkesanan Latihan Dialog dalam Pengajaran Kata Ganti Nama dalam Bahasa Arab.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(3), 88-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ryding, K. C. (2005). A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles