A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis: Constructions of Identity and Power in Animal Farm by George Orwell

This study incorporates a corpus-assisted Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) methodology to analyse the way language in George Orwell's Animal Farm structure’s identity and authority. Following Van Dijk's theory of ideological polarization and Fairclough's three-dimensional model, the study focuses on how stylistic components such as slogans, repetition, and collocations can reinforce binary distinctions between groups and ideological assertions. Given that Animal Farm has been extensively studied via political and allegorical viewpoints, little research has been put toward exploring the discursive significance of Orwell's linguistic choices in shaping both power and identity. By including AntConc corpus tools into the analysis, the study strengthens CDA clarity and empirical support. The findings suggest that phrases and collocations may disclose systematic approaches for building in-group legitimacy (the pigs) and out-group deviance (the other animals). The present study contributes a methodologically distinct contribution to the structure of sociolinguistics by researching how language is used to define identity and power in a fictional narrative. It indicates how corpus-assisted CDA assists in helping researchers comprehend the ideological aspects of discourse and how they intersect with social power relations. Moreover, the findings emphasize fiction's relevance as an acceptable domain for sociolinguistic study, and CDA may disclose the ideological mechanisms inherent to the narrative. The study provides both practical and theoretical additions to the fields of applied linguistics and the arts and humanities.

Critical Discourse Analysis, Identity Construction

1. Anthony, L. (2019). AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer software]. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baker, P. (2021). Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Flowerdew, J., & Richardson, J. E. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gleason, A. (2018). Totalitarianism: The inner history of the Cold War. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Grigoryan, M. (2020). Ideological language in Orwell’s Animal Farm: A critical discourse analysis perspective. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics, 4(3), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4127892 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jeffries, L. (2010). Critical stylistics: The power of English. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Khafaga, F. H. (2021). A pragma-stylistic analysis of persuasive discourse in Orwell’s Animal Farm. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(11), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.11.22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lazar, M. M. (2020). Rhetorical strategies in political discourse: Orwell’s legacy. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(6), 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19089.laz [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2023). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction (2nd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mahlberg, M. (2013). Corpus stylistics and Dickens’s fiction. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Merzah, A. S. (2024). Linguistic manipulation in Orwell’s Animal Farm: A pragma-stylistic perspective. Arab World English Journal, 15(2), 118–143. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no2.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2018). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Reisigl, M. (2020). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 44–67). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781472987343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rodden, J. (1999). George Orwell: The politics of literary reputation. Transaction Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sharhan, B. A., Hussein, B. A., & Younus, H. S. (2021). Dominant ideology in Orwell’s Animal Farm: A critical discourse analysis of selected extracts. International Journal of Development in Social Sciences and Humanities, 12(2), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.53935/26415313.v12i2.28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wales, K. (2014). A dictionary of stylistics (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wodak, R. (2021). Critical discourse studies at a crossroads. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1884479 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Sage [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests