Translanguaging Under Conditions of Extreme Linguistic Heterogeneity: Evidence from Urban Primary Classrooms in Zambia

Translanguaging has become a major framework for understanding multilingual meaning-making in education, yet much of the literature has tended to assume classroom contexts in which learners and teachers share relatively stable or sufficiently overlapping linguistic repertoires. This article examines how translanguaging operates in highly heterogeneous urban primary school classrooms in Livingstone, Zambia, where no single shared learner language can be consistently assumed. Drawing on a qualitative interpretivist case study, the study used classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with twenty teachers and twenty pupils from selected primary schools to investigate patterns of language use, instructional practice, learner participation, and teachers’ engagement with language-in-education policy. The findings show that multilingual classroom interaction was not random but systematically patterned according to communicative role and pedagogical function. English was more prominent in formal teacher-led and teacher-directed interaction, while Nyanja featured strongly in peer clarification and collaborative meaning-making, with Tonga and Lozi appearing in more context-specific ways. Teachers used multilingual practices strategically to scaffold understanding, clarify tasks, and sustain lesson flow, while learners relied on peer-mediated multilingual processing before producing formal classroom responses. The study further found that classroom interaction was shaped by partial linguistic overlap, requiring teachers to make moment-to-moment decisions across unevenly shared linguistic resources. It also revealed a clear mismatch between formal language-in-education policy and the realities of multilingual urban classroom practice. The article argues that in such contexts translanguaging should be understood not only as fluid repertoire mobilisation, but as pedagogical coordination under conditions of incomplete commonality, institutional constraint, and interactional necessity. By foregrounding classroom-based evidence from an underrepresented African urban context, the article extends translanguaging theory and contributes to more context-sensitive understandings of multilingual pedagogy, teacher agency, and language policy enactment.

Translanguaging; multilingual education

1. BERA. (2024). BERA ethical guidelines for educational research (5th ed.). British Educational Research Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Heugh, K. (2015). Epistemologies in multilingual education: Translanguaging and genre-companions in conversation with policy and practice. Language and Education, 29(3), 280–285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ministry of Education, Science, Vocational Training and Early Education. (2013). Zambia Education Curriculum Framework 2013. Curriculum Development Centre. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Moraru, M., Bakker, A., Akkerman, S., Zenger, L., Smit, J., & Blom, E. (2025). Translanguaging within and across learning settings: A systematic review focused on multilingual children with a migration background engaged in content learning. Review of Education, 13(2), e70069. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Simachenya, M., & Mambwe, K. (2023). Language practices in multilingual classrooms of selected primary schools in Livingstone - Zambia. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 3(4), 702–710. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tai, K. W. H. (2022). Translanguaging as inclusive pedagogical practices in English-medium instruction science and mathematics classrooms for linguistically and culturally diverse students. Research in Science Education, 52, 1661–1682. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. UNESCO. (2025). Languages matter: Global guidance on multilingual education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000392477 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. UNICEF Zambia. (2023). Final report [Language of instruction study]. UNICEF Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests