Lexical Competence, Metacognitive Skills, and Writing Self-Efficacy as Links to Writing Performance among Struggling Grade 12 Writers

Writing proficiency is a fundamental academic skill that requires the integration of vocabulary knowledge, strategic regulation, and confidence in written communication. However, limited studies have examined the combined roles of lexical competence, metacognitive skills, and writing self-efficacy in relation to writing performance among struggling senior high school writers. This study examined the relationships among lexical competence, metacognitive skills, writing self-efficacy, and writing performance in a group of 149 struggling Grade 12 Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS) writers in a selected school in Bukidnon during the School Year 2025–2026. Using a quantitative descriptive–correlational design, data were collected through the Lexical Competence Test, the Metacognitive Strategies of Writing Survey (MSWS), the Questionnaire of English Writing Self-Efficacy (QEWSE), and an analytic rubric for writing performance. Descriptive statistics, canonical correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis were used to analyze the data. The results revealed that participants demonstrated a Fair level of lexical competence, with strength in word formation but weakness in collocation knowledge. Metacognitive skills were High, while writing self-efficacy was Moderate. Writing performance remained at a Fair level. Canonical correlation analysis indicated that lexical competence and metacognitive skills were significantly associated with writing performance, whereas writing self-efficacy was not. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the model was statistically significant; however, only lexical competence emerged as a significant predictor. The findings highlight the role of vocabulary knowledge in writing development. It is recommended that English teachers implement collocation-focused vocabulary instruction and structured writing supports to improve learners’ writing performance.

Lexical competence, Metacognitive skills

1. Abdelaziz, A., Najat, M., & Laaboudi, D. (2024). The contribution of vocabulary breadth and depth to narrative writing ability: A partial least squares structural equation modelling approach. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 1996. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v7n3.1996 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, N., & Rawshdeh, I. (2023). Writing competence and lexical diversity in EFL context of Hungarian and Jordanian university students. International Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.30957/ijoltl.v9i1.769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, E. (2021). Performance-based assessment of students’ communication skills. International Journal of Chinese Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/22125868211006202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Graham, S. (2020). The sciences of reading and writing must become more fully integrated. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S35–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Heng, R., Pu, L., & Liu, X. (2023). The effects of genre on the lexical richness of argumentative and expository writing by Chinese EFL learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1082228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1082228 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kamasak, R., & Sahan, K. (2023). Academic success in English-medium courses: Exploring student challenges, opinions, language proficiency, and L2 use. RELC Journal, 54(3), 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231167611 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lavigne, C. S., Tremblay, K. A., & Binder, K. S. (2022). It’s in the way that you use it: How vocabulary knowledge and usage predict writing quality among adult basic education learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(5), 1023–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09877-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Liontas, J. I., Bangun, I. V., & Li, S. (2023). Lexical collocational instruction in EAP writing via COCA. Teaching English with Technology, 23(1), 80–106. https://doi.org/10.56297/BKAM1691/RQCC4475 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Moqbali, I. S., Humaidi, S. A., & Hilal, M. A. (2020). Metacognitive writing strategies used by Omani Grade 12 students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(9), 41–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Roxas, M. J. D. (2020). Exploring senior high school students’ academic writing difficulties: Towards an academic writing model. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj376 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sánchez Muñoz, G., & Salazar Campillo, P. (2024). Proficiency and writing at high school level in Spain: Scoring students’ EFL performance with an analytic rubric. Estudios Interlingüísticos, 12(1), 179–196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sun, T. (2021). Relationship between writing self-efficacy and writing achievement: Evidence from an empirical study and a meta-analysis (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Charlotte). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Urbano, R. V., Dionisio, A. G., & Balelen, M. A. (2021). Writing skills of senior high school students: A basis for intervention program. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests