Assessment of the Impact of Situational Crime Prevention Strategies on Banditry Activities in Katsina State, Nigeria

This study assessed the impact of situational crime prevention (SCP) strategies on banditry activities in Katsina State, Nigeria. Guided by five objectives, corresponding research questions, and null hypotheses tested at the 0.05 level of significance, the research employed a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to 400 households and victims across five Local Government Areas (Batsari, Jibia, Safana, Kankara, and Faskari), while qualitative insights were obtained from semi-structured interviews with 30 key stakeholders and field observations. Reliability testing using Cronbach’s Alpha yielded values between 0.78 and 0.86, confirming strong internal consistency. Data analysis combined descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, ANOVA, correlation, regression, and t-tests with thematic analysis of qualitative responses. Findings revealed that SCP strategies are moderately applied but unevenly distributed, with surveillance and community policing more prominent than environmental design and target hardening. Statistical results confirmed that SCP strategies significantly reduce the frequency and severity of banditry incidents, though perceptual differences exist between community members and security agencies. Structural challenges including resource constraints, poor infrastructure, limited manpower, and community distrust were identified as barriers to effective implementation. The study concludes that SCP strategies are effective but must be institutionalized, expanded through community policing, and integrated into broader socioeconomic and governance reforms. Recommendations include strengthening rural infrastructure, enhancing security training, scaling up community policing, and embedding SCP into national crime prevention policy frameworks. This research contributes originality by extending SCP theory to rural banditry in Nigeria, providing empirical validation through mixed methods, and offering actionable policy insights for sustainable security interventions.

Banditry; Crime Prevention; Community Policing

1. Ahmed, F. A., Akhtar, A., & Gul, S. (2025). The role of urban design in preventing crime: insights from environmental criminology. PAKISTAN ISLAMICUS (An International Journal of Islamic & Social Sciences), 5(01), 01-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ajibade, A. A., Akano, O., Kadir, R. D., & Fonahanmi-Idris, O. M. (2024). Strategic approaches to crime prevention through community policing in Ifelodun LGA, Kwara, Nigeria. Journal of Security Studies, 12(3), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akinyetun, T. (2022). Banditry in Nigeria: Insights from Situational Action and Situational Crime Prevention Theories. Conflict Trends. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bello, M. (2023). An evaluation of the banditry reduction strategies implemented by the Katsina State Government of Nigeria (2015–2023). Bayero University, Kano. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Clarke, R. V. (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed.). Harrow and Heston. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Eck, J. E., & Clarke, R. V. (2019). Situational crime prevention: Theory, practice and evidence. In Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 355-376). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mbam, N. M., Jacob, U. H., & Amiara, S. A. (2024). Kidnapping and banditry: A critique of the Nigerian security, 1999–2022. South East Political Science Review, 9(1), 77–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oakley, D. (2024). Building resilient communities: The case for social cohesion. Protection Approaches, December, 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rabiu, A., & Garba, M. (2025). Economic, education and social implications of banditry on affected communities in Katsina State. International Journal of Economics, Environmental Development and Society, 6(4), 782–797. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Santoso, E., Sumantri, G., Dharma, S., Purnomo, H., Jha, G. K., & Insani, N. (2025). Community Policing Enactment in Crime Prevention at South Jakarta. KARSA Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 33(1), 135-161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Schaefer, L. (2021). Routine activity theory. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Silverman, D. (2020). Interpreting qualitative data (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sutton, A., Cherney, A., White, R., & Clancey, G. (2021). Crime prevention. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Walker, L. (2025). Crime Prevention Professionals’ Perspectives on Using CPTED to Mitigate Targeted Violence on K-12 School Campuses. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wikström, P. O. H., Oberwittler, D., Treiber, K., & Hardie, B. (2017). Situational action theory. In Developmental and life-course criminological theories (pp. 125-170). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wikström, P. O. H. (2006). Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational Action Theory. In R. V. Clarke & J. M. Eck (Eds.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 20, pp. 1–36). Criminal Justice Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study