Science Teachers’ Use of English as a Second Language (ESL)-Derived Literacy Strategies

Authors

Philip H. Brillo

Graduate Student, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Dr. James L. Paglinawan

Faculty, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400265

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 3580-3589

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-12

Accepted: 2026-04-18

Published: 2026-05-06

Abstract

The Philippines has emerged as a premier global hub for English language instruction, propelled by its exceptional English proficiency and commanding presence in the English as a Second Language (ESL) industry. Despite this strength, the Philippines continues to face significant challenges in science literacy and functional illiteracy. This underscores the urgent need to explore how science teachers, especially those with an ESL background, leverage their expertise in language instruction to support science learning. This study employed a descriptive qualitative research design that aims to explore the science teachers’ use of ESL-derived literacy strategies in science instruction. Data from thirteen high school science teachers with ESL teaching backgrounds, were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s (2019) reflexive thematic analysis. The findings show that science teachers perceive students’ literacy skills as developing but constrained by language and comprehension barriers. In response, they employ ESL-derived literacy strategies such as pre-teaching vocabulary, visual and multimodal supports, and interactive language scaffolds to improve comprehension, make abstract concepts more concrete, boost confidence, and foster engagement, ultimately deepening conceptual understanding and retention in English-medium science lessons. However, these efforts are limited by time constraints, varying student proficiency, and strategy-content misalignment. These challenges highlight the need for accessible resources, extended instructional time, targeted professional development, and strategic implementation guidance. The study concludes that science teachers perceive that students’ literacy skills are hindered by linguistic challenges, prompting teachers to use ESL-derived strategies to enhance understanding; however, the effectiveness of these strategies is impeded by structural and contextual factors, highlighting the need for stronger systemic support. Future research may explore the effectiveness of literacy-infused science instruction in the Philippine context.

Keywords

functional illiteracy, pre-teaching, multimodal support

Downloads

References

1. Alhazmi, A., & Alzahrani, M. (2025). The Impact of Bilingual vs English-Only Instruction on the Performance of Undergraduate Saudi Medical Science Students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Volume 16, 1063–1075. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s520706 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andres-Kimkiman, J. R. (2025). Development of communicative competence in English language curriculum of ESL secondary schools. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0641 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Blair, A., De Oliveira, L. C., & Avalos, M. A. (2024). Expanding teacher understanding of scaffolding for multilingual learners using a language-based approach to content instruction. TESOL in Context, 33(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2024vol33no1art2008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bordey, H. (2025). PSA: Over 18M high school grads don’t understand what they read. GMA News Online. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/944513/over-18m-filipino-high-school-graduates-can-t-comprehend-2024-psa-study/story/? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Collins, K., & Lasky, S. (2025). Scaffolding learning in science class with literacy strategies. Kentucky Teacher Education Journal the Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Kentucky Council for Exceptional Children, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.61611/2995-5904.1063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Corpuz, J. M. M., Morales, A. N., Clarin, A. S., Dionio, B. B., & Cocolan, J. V. (2024). Students’ Vocabulary Skills in Relation to their Reading Comprehension in Language Literature. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(X), 2137–2150. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.8100183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dancel, C. U., & Lagura, R. T. (2026). Integration of language strategies in teaching science. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 5(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v5i1.6490 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Erikson, J. A., Alt, M., Pyarelal, A., & Kapa, L. L. (2024). Science vocabulary and Science achievement of children with Language/Literacy Disorders and typical language development. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 56(1), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_lshss-24-00025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fuentesal-García, J., González-Peño, A., García-Hernández, A., & Franco, E. (2025). Communicative Self-confidence and Motivation: an educational experience of linguistic immersion and leisure in nature. www.eriesjournal.com. https://www.eriesjournal.com/index.php/eries/article/view/1746 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gao, S., Hall, J. L., Zygouris-Coe, V., & Grysko, R. A. (2022, May 6). Understanding the role of Science-Specific Literacy Strategies in supporting science teaching and student learning: a case study of preservice Elementary teachers in a science methods course that integrated a disciplinary literacy framework. https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/21771 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Goyibova, N., Muslimov, N., Sabirova, G., Kadirova, N., & Samatova, B. (2025). Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learner needs. MethodsX, 14, 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103163 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Grapin, S. E., & Llosa, L. (2021). Dynamic assessment of English learners in the content areas: an exploratory study in Fifth‐Grade Science. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mercado, J. (2025). Utilizing Integrated Teaching Approach in Teaching Literature to ESL Learners: A Systematic review. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 7(1), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i1.1941 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Parungao, A. (2023). PH highly proficient in English language — 2023 English Proficiency Index. INQUIRER.net. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1860493/ph-highly-proficient-in-english [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Putra, H. S., Sugiharto, S., Da Silva, A. M., & Syahrizal, T. (2025). Pedagogical translanguaging in language education: Constructing translanguaging space to reduce cognitive load in support of sustainable development goals (SDGs). International Journal of Language Education, 9(3), 656. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.77403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Romine, W., Van Garderen, D., Folk, W., Lannin, A., Juergensen, R., Smith, C., Abedelnaby, H., & Milarsky, T. (2023). Science Literacy: Using multimodal STEM text sets to help students with disabilities engage in argumentation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 47(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487231209505 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Rufaidah, D., Andayani, A., & Wardani, N. E. (2024). Multiliteracy-Based Differentiated instruction for language learning in the Center of Excellence Vocational High Schools. World Journal of English Language, 15(3), 90. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n3p90 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Second Congressional Commission on Education. (2025, April 29). Around 18M Filipinos finished high school despite being functionally illiterate. https://edcom2.gov.ph/around-18m-filipinos-finished-high-school-despite-being-functionally-illiterate/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Selvathurai, S., & Ismail, H. H. (2024). Second Language Learners’ Difficulties in Reading Comprehension: a review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i4/23972 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Topal, A. (2024). Timing Vocabulary Instruction for English Language Learners: Evaluating the Impact of Pre- Teaching vs. Post-Teaching Approaches on STEAM Comprehension. Saint Mary’s Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.stmarys-ca.edu/matl-action-research/26/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Vadivel, B., Namaziandost, E., & Saeedian, A. (2021). Progress in English language teaching through continuous Professional Development—Teachers’ Self-Awareness, Perception, and feedback. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.757285 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Van Eijck, T., Bredeweg, B., Holt, J., Pijls, M., Bouwer, A., Hotze, A., Louman, E., Ouchchahd, A., & Sprinkhuizen, M. (2024). Combining hands-on and minds-on learning with interactive diagrams in primary science education. International Journal of Science Education, 47(18), 2413–2433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2387225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Villabona, N., & Cenoz, J. (2021). The integration of content and language in CLIL: a challenge for content-driven and language-driven teachers. Language Culture and Curriculum, 35(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wong, V., Fujita, T., Hill, A., & Ruffle, S. (2025). Patterns of student discourse in solving quantitative science problems. International Journal of Science Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2488399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Yawiloeng, R. (2022). Using Instructional Scaffolding and Multimodal Texts to Enhance Reading Comprehension: Perceptions and Attitudes of EFL Students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(2), 877-894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles