Grammatical Paradigms Realisation in the Predicates of Conditional Sentences in Dholuo in Systemic Functional Grammar

Sentences, being the largest units of language, are useful in talking about events, actions and situations in terms of when they took place, their state of completion as well as the language user’s disposition. These three critical variables, other than being marked by different morphemes, are domiciled within the predicate which may or may not comprise both the main verb and an auxiliary. These three grammatical categories that are considered language universals, are marked differently by different languages and are also known to greatly influence the syntax and the semantics of any given type of sentences. Dholuo, a Western Nilo-Sahara language spoken in the Western part of Kenya and also in other countries in East Africa has its unique way of marking and expressing tense, aspect and modality. Since this has not been conclusively described and documented, this paper sought to describe, examine and explain the realisation of these three categories in conditional sentences in Dholuo. This study used descriptive-analytic research design and adopted Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) theory for its theoretical framework. The data upon which the findings were based on, was collected using elicitation frame administered on two native speakers and verified by the author as a native speaker of Dholuo. The data analysis adopted was both thematic and textual analysis to explain the manifestation and the ordering of the three grammatical paradigms within the predicates of the different categories of conditional sentences in Dholuo. The data showed that Dholuo has three distinct morphemes- ne, se, and de, that are used within the verb complex to mark tense, aspect and modality respectively in a manner that reflects the interplay between morphology, syntax and semantics. These findings make a contribution to the knowledge on Dholuo grammar generally and conditional sentences in Dholuo in particular.

Grammatical paradigm, tense, aspect, modality

1. Adams, E. W. (1987). On the Meaning of the Conditional. Philosophical Topics, 15(1), 5-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, A. R. (1951). A note on subjunctive and counterfactual conditionals. Analysis, 12(2), 35-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Banks, D. (2020). Systemic Functional Linguistics as a model for text analysis. ASp. la revue du GERAS, (35-36), 23-34. 335- 345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brinton, J.L. (2000). The Structure of Modern English: A linguistic Introduction, John Benjamin, Amsterdam [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brinton, J.L. and Brinton, D.M. (2010). The Linguistic structure of Modern English, JohnBenjamin, Amsterdam [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Burton-Roberts, N. (2011). Analyzing Sentences: An Introduction to English Syntax, Longman, London [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Carnie, A. (2011). Modern Syntax, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cohen, D.W. (1974). The River-Lake Nilotes from the fifteenth century. In Zamani: A Survey of East African History, ed. By Ogot B.A and Kieran, J.A. Longman Kenya, Nairobi [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teachers’ Course. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Downing, A. (2015). English Grammar: A university Course (3rd Ed), Routledge, London [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Egan, S.M, Garcia-Madruga, J.A, and Byrne, R.M. (2009). Indicative and Counterfactual ‘Only If’ Conditionals. Acta Psychologica, 132(3), 240-249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. A&c Black. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Frazier, S. (2003). A corpus analysis of would‐clauses without adjacent if‐clauses. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 443-466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Givon, T. (2001). Syntax: An Introduction., John Benjamin, Amsterdam [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. 18.Greenbaum, S., Nelson, G. (2002). An Introduction to English Grammar, Longman, London [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Halliday M.A. K and Matthiessen, C.IM. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (4th ed) Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Herbst, T. and Schuller, S. (2008). Introduction to Syntactic Analysis: A valency approach, Gunter Narr Verlag Tubigen, Tubigen [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kothari, C.R. (2003). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, New Age International Publishers, New Delhi [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Madut, K.K. (2020). The Luo People in Southern Sudan: Ethnological Heredities of East Africa, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, New Castle [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mugenda, M & Mugenda, A. (2003). Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. ACT Press, Nairobi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Murphy, R. (2019). English Grammar in Use. 5th Ed. Cambridge University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ochieng, W. (1975). People Around the Lake. Evans, Nairobi [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ogot, B. A. (1967). History of the Southern Luo, Vol. 1 East African Publishing House, Nairobi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Okombo, D. (1997). A Functional Grammar of Dholuo, Rudiger-koppe,Koln [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Payne, T.E. (2011). Understanding English Grammar: A linguistic Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, G., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1973). A Grammar of Contemporary English, Longman, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Quirk, R. Greenbaum, G., Leech, G., Svartvik, J., (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, London [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Stafford, R. L. (1967). An elementary Luo grammar: with vocabularies. Oxford University Press, Nairobi [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Swan, M. (2005). Practical English Usage. (3rd Ed.). Oxford University Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tesner, R, V. and Eston, E, E. (2007). Analysing the Grammar of English, Georgetown University Press, Washington [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Thomson, A.J., & Martinet, A.V. (1986). A Practical English Grammar. 4th Ed. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Vaux, B., & Cooper, J. (2005) Introduction to Linguistic Field Methods, Lincom. Europa, Muechen. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Synonymy in the Songs of Ummaru Bagobiri: A Contextual Linguistics Analysis
• Aspect of Compounding and Affixation in Bassa-Nge
• Kinayah (Metonymy) in Malay: An Analysis Based on the Science of Balaghah
• Optimality Theory: Application of Dahl’s law in Kindia
• Selling Diversity: The Politics of Representation in Global Advertising