Ethical Artificial Intelligence in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Classrooms: Balancing Innovation with Responsible Skill Development among Tertiary Institution Students
Authors
Department of Natural Science Education, Lagos State University of Education, Oto/Ijanikin, Lagos State (Nigeria)
Department of Natural Science Education, Lagos State University of Education, Oto/Ijanikin, Lagos State (Nigeria)
Department of Biology Education, Federal College of Education (Technical), Umunze, Anambra State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400315
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 4304-4313
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-28
Accepted: 2025-12-03
Published: 2026-05-07
Abstract
The increasing application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) classrooms is revolutionising teaching and learning worldwide. However, this progress raises ethical concerns regarding responsible use, data privacy and the erosion of human thinking in learning. This descriptive survey study examined how STEM students in the three Lagos State-owned tertiary institutions in Nigeria perceive and respond to ethical issues in AI-driven learning environments and how these perceptions influence the development of responsible digital skills. A sample of 430 undergraduate 300 level STEM students participated in the study. Data were collected using the Ethical AI and Responsible Skill Development Questionnaire (EAIRSDQ), comprising sections on demographics, AI awareness, ethical understanding and responsible usage. The questionnaire was validated by three experts in AI ethics and educational measurement, and a pilot study yielded a Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient of 0.87. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean) and inferential statistics (ANOVA). Results revealed strong students’ level of awareness about ethical implications of AI tools in learning and responsible AI integration and use in STEM education for skills development. ANOVA result further showed significant differences in ethical awareness and responsible use across STEM disciplines. This implies that ethical AI literacy is influenced by disciplinary context, making uniform instructional approaches insufficient. Consequently, it is recommended that tertiary institutions adopt discipline-specific ethical AI frameworks, embed structured ethics training within STEM curricula and promote interdisciplinary integration to ensure consistent and responsible AI use across all fields.
Keywords
Ethical AI, innovation, responsible skill development, STEM classrooms, tertiary institutions
Downloads
References
1. Adewusi, M. A., CAinebyoona, C., Odekeye, O.T., & Ngoma, M, (2024). AI in universities: The good, the bot, and the ugly truths. Research Square, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adigun, J. T., Tijani, A., Haihambo, S., & Enock, S. (2025). Teacher preparedness and digital innovation: Challenges of AI integration in Nigerian science classrooms. International Journal of Instructional Technology, 14(2), 112-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Afolabi, A. (2024). Ethical Issues in Artificial Intelligence Adoption in African Higher Education Institutions in Nigeria. African Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 3(2), 22 – 33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K–12 settings. AI and Ethics, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Binns, R., & Veale, M. (2020). Is that your final decision? Multi-stage profiling, selective effects, and Article 22 of the GDPR. International Data Privacy Law, 10(4), 319–333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Castañeda, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(22), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chan, C. Y., & Hu, W. S. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology High. Educ., 20, 43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Dieterle, E., Dede, C., & Walker, M. (2022). The cyclical ethical effects of using artificial intelligence in education. AI & Society. 36, 633-643. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. du Boulay, B. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education and Ethics. In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1–16). Springer, Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ekwu, O., Ikwuanusi, C., & Okonkwo, F. (2025). AI in science education and innovative approaches for teaching STEM. SEAHI Publications: International Journal of Innovative Science and STEM Education Research, 13(1), 305-312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Espinoza-Vidaurre, S. M., Velásquez Rodríguez, N. C., Gambetta Quelopana, R. L., Martinez Valdivia, A. N., Leo Rossi, E. A., & Nolasco-Mamani, M. A. (2024). Perceptions of artificial intelligence and its impact on academic integrity among university students in Peru and Chile: An approach to sustainable education. Sustainability, 16(20), 90-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 99-120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Harper, M. (2024). Engineering faculty perceptions on student-use of Generative Artifcial Intelligence (GAI) in course completion. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Fall 2023 to Present. 329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. 16(8), 455. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., ... & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Imoniri, A. R. (2025). Harnessing artificial intelligence in science education for skills development and economic transformation in Nigeria. Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, 10(3), 77–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Jain, S., & Jain, R. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence integration into Nigerian university system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Marketing, 1(5), 48-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board. (2024). Annual report on Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) candidates. Abuja: JAMB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Kamalov, F., Santandreu-Calonge, D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), 1245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Käser, T., & Alexandron, G. (2023). Simulated Learners in Educational Technology: A Systematic Literature Review and a Turing-like Test. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Kim, J., Klopfer, M., Grohs, J. R., Eldardiry, H., Weichert, J., Cox, L. A., & Pike, D. (2025). Examining faculty and student perceptions of generative AI in university courses. Innovative Higher Education. 50(4), 1281–1313. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2021). Artificial intelligence and the future of education: Critical issues and pathways forward. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1411–1422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Madhloom, J. K., Noori, Z. H., Ebis, S. K., Hassen, O. A., & Darwish, S. M. (2023). An Information Security Engineering Framework for Modeling Packet Filtering Firewall Using Neutrosophic Petri Nets. Computers, 12(10), 202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Matjie, M. A., Nethavhani, A., & Matlakala, M. (2026). AI and the digital divide in education. Frontier Computer Science, 8,1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Mirea, N., Palade, M., & Gaureanu, A. (2024). STEM Education, Artificial Intelligence, and Ethical Challenges. Artificial Intelligence for Human-Technologies Economy Sustainable Development, Lublin, Poland, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Mittelstadt, B. D. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501–507. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Mouta, A., Pinto-Llorente, A. M., & Torrecilla-Sánchez, E. M. (2023). Uncovering Blind Spots in Education Ethics: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34, 1166–1205, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. National Artificial Intelligence Policy (NITDA) (2022). National Artificial Intelligence Policy (Draft). National Information Technology Development Agency. https://nitda.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/National-AI-Policy-Draft.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. National Commission for Colleges of Education (NCCE). (2026). NCCE commences comprehensive review of NCE curriculum, integrates AI and emerging technology standards. [Press Release]. https://ncce.gov.ng/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. National Universities Commission (NUC). (2026). ES renews commitment to pursuing NUS roadmap: Validating AI integration in teaching. Abuja: NUC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. National Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Education Statistics Report. Abuja: NBS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221–4241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Nworgu, B. G. (2015). Educational Research: Basic Issues and Methodology (3rd ed.). University Trust Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Saibu, S. O., Ogunmade, T. O., Oginni, A. M. & Alaka, M. O. (2018). Teachers’ ICT literacy and gender disparity as correlate of students’ performance in chemistry. Research Journal of Educational and Review, 4(1&2), 30-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Salami, A.O. (2024). Artificial intelligence, digital colonialism, and the implications for Africa’s future development. Data & Policy, 6, e67-1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Sambasivan, N., Kapania, S., Highfill, H., Akrong, D., Paritosh, P., & Aroyo, L. (2021). “Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data cascades in high-stakes AI. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Selwyn, N. (2024). Education and artificial intelligence: The need for critical perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Ukala, G., Ukala, C., & Chukwuemeka, P. (2025). Leveraging on artificial intelligence in enhancing STEM education: A case study of ChatGPT in Nigerian universities. European Journal of Health and Biology Education, 12(1), e2505, 1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Usher, M., & Barak, M. (2024). Unpacking the role of AI ethics online education for science and engineering students. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, 35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. White, G. & Case L. L. P. (2025). AI Watch: Global regulatory tracker - Nigeria and the Data Protection Act. Legal Briefing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. World Economic Forum. (2023). Shaping integrity: Why generative artificial intelligence does not have to undermine education. PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11540794/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study