AI-Enhanced Visual Design Education: A Case Study of Chinese Tiger Symbolism

Authors

Yan Yikang

Department of Art Education, Faculty of Art, Sustainability & Creative Industry, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak (Malaysia)

Jamilah binti Omar

School of Design and Art, Shandong Huayu University of Technology, 253034 Dezhou, Shandong (China)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400365

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 4989-5007

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-14

Accepted: 2026-04-20

Published: 2026-05-09

Abstract

This study examines how generative artificial intelligence (AI) can be integrated into visual design education through a heritage-based learning project focused on Chinese tiger symbolism. Rather than treating AI as a simple image-generation tool, the study investigates its pedagogical role in supporting students’ creative exploration, cultural interpretation, and critical reflection during the design process.
A qualitative case study was conducted in a university-level visual design course involving 24 undergraduate students. During a practice-based project, students used generative AI tools, including MidJourney, Stable Diffusion, and ChatGPT, to explore, generate, and refine visual representations of Chinese tiger symbolism. Data were collected through reflective journals, focus group discussions, design artefacts, and classroom observations, and were analyzed thematically.

Keywords

Generative artificial intelligence; Visual design education; Cultural heritage

Downloads

References

1. Abrusci, L., Dabaghi, K., D’Urso, S., & Sciarrone, F. (2025). AI4Design: A generative AI-based system to improve creativity in design—A field evaluation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akman, E. (2025). The impact of AI-based visual designs on students’ AI literacy and attitudes toward AI. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(8), 5118–5136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2530630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baltà-Salvador, R., Brasó-Vives, E., & Peña, M. (2026). Evaluating AI-assisted creative ideation: A crossover study in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 59, 101958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101958 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Boakye-Yiadom, F., Donkor, E. K., & Mensah, R. O. (2025). Exploring the role of project-based learning in higher education to promote indigenous knowledge through sculpture students’ engagement with Ghanaian Adinkra symbols. Discover Global Society, 3, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-024-00135-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Farran, H., Khlaif, Z. N., Saifi, A. G., Hijjawi, T., & Bani Ismail, H. (2026). Generative AI adoption among arts and design students in Palestinian higher education: Impacts on task completion. Cogent Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2594885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Georgieva, I., & Georgiev, G. V. (2025). Exploring the use of generative text AI in design creativity inquiries. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 6, 100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100219 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Habib, S., Vogel, T., Thorne, E., & Xiao, A. (2024). How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? Journal of Creativity, 34, 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Koutromanos, G., Koukopoulos, D., Koukopoulos, Z., & Mouzakis, C. (2023). Cultural heritage content development and dissemination through a participatory platform: Lessons learned from in-service teachers’ perception. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 3513–3536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11336-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lee, C.-W. (2025). Application of generative artificial intelligence in design education: An exploration and analysis to enhance student creativity. Engineering Proceedings, 98(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025098029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Medel-Vera, C., Britton, S., & Gates, W. F. (2025). An exploration of the role of generative AI in fostering creativity in architectural learning environments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100501 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Park, H. (2025). Generative AI in studio-based design education: Human–AI relationships, collaboration and assessment. In C.-Y. Chang, C.-H. Chen, & Y. Hsu (Eds.), IASDR 2025: Design Next (pp. not available). https://doi.org/10.21606/iasdr.2025.845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Siu, K. W. M., Zou, J., Jiang, Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, K., & Zhao, T. (2025). Dynamic scaffolding: Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in urban design education. Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-025-00060-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. UNESCO. (n.d.). Intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/intangible-cultural-heritage [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Yatim, H., Jayadi, K., Chairuddin, A., & Manda, D. (2025). Integrating cultural heritage into education: The supportive role of schools in traditional festivals in West Sulawesi. Discover Education, 4, Article 847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00847-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Yu, W. F. (2025). AI as a co-creator and a design material: Transforming the design process. Design Studies, 96, 101306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2025.101306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles