The Construction of Cultural Identity among Reyog Ponorogo Practitioners, East Java Indonesia

This study examines the construction of cultural identity among Reyog Ponorogo practitioners in Malang Regency, Indonesia. Drawing on symbolic interactionism and Alfred Schutz’s social phenomenology, the study analyzes how cultural identity is produced, interpreted, and reproduced through symbolic practices, lived experiences, and collective meaning-making within the Reyog community. Employing a qualitative phenomenological approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation involving members of the Reyog Ponorogo Youth Arts Practitioners Community (PPSRP). The findings reveal that cultural identity is not a naturally inherited attribute but a dynamic social process shaped by symbolic interpretation, intersubjective experience, and the internalization of shared values. In this context, Reyog functions as a cultural system that sustains collective identity, social cohesion, and cultural continuity in a migrant social setting. This study contributes to sociology and cultural studies by demonstrating that traditional performing arts serve as significant mechanisms in the construction of cultural identity in contemporary society.

cultural identity; Reyog Ponorogo;

1. Achmadi, A. (2012). Reyog Ponorogo dalam tinjauan aksiologi relevansinya dengan Pembangunan Karakter Bangsa. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmadi, D. (2008). Interaksi Simbolik: Suatu Pengantar. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v9i2.1115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alfred Schutz: Pengarusutamaan Fenomenologi dalam Tradisi Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amini, A. (2020). Social Identity : A Composite Concept in Social Sciences Research. 8(01), 26–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brenner, P. S., Stets, J. E., & Serpe, R. T. (2021). Identities in Action: Developments in Identity Theory. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Carter, M. J., & Fuller, C. (2016). Symbols, meaning, and action: The past, present, and future of symbolic interactionism. Current Sociology, 64(6). 931-961. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Faisol, & Wahyuni, S. (2017). Konstruksi Identitas Kelompok Suporter dalam Komunitas (Studi Kasus Bonek Mania). Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan Humanis, 02(02), 149–158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Feitosa, J., Salas, E., & Salazar, M. R. (2012). Social identity: Clarifying its dimensions across cultures. Psihologijske Teme (Psychological Topics), 21(3), 527–548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fisher, C. D. (1986). Organizational Socialisation: An Integrative Review. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 101–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Frosh, S. (1999). Identity. In: Bullock A, Trombley S (eds) The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought. London: Harper Collins Publishers, 413. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hall, S. (1992). The Question of Cultural Identity. In: S. Hall, D. Held and T. McGrew (Eds.), Modernity and Its Futures. Milton Keynes. Cambridge: Open University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hans, J. (1959). Alfred Schutz, 1899-1959. Social Research : The Johns Hopkins University Press, 26(4), 471–474. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hall, S. (2021). The fateful triangle: Race, ethnicity, nation. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Harsono, J. (2022). Komodifikasi Kesenian Reyog Dalam Dinamika Politik Lokal [Universitas Muhammadiyah Kabupaten Malang]. https://eprints.umm.ac.id/89570/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hasanah, N. (2020). Simbolisme Tari Topeng Barong Kemiren di Kabupaten Banyuwangi: Kajian Etnokoreologi. Jurnal Seni Peran, 03(01), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hogg, M. A. (2006). Social Identity Theory dalam Peter J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary Social Psychological Theories. Standford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jary, D., & Jary, J. (2012). Collins dictionary of sociology [electronic resource]. In Dictionary of sociology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Leonardelli, G. J., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2010). Optimal Distinctiveness Theory. A Framework for Social Identity, Social Cognition, and Intergroup Relations. In [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nur Aini, R., & Puspitasari, H. (2019). Konstruksi Makna Simbolik pada Tari Reog Ponorogo (Studi Etnografi pada Komunitas Reog di Ponorogo). Jurnal Komunikasi Massa, 05(01), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
• Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
• Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
• Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
• Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study