Human Capital Development and Technological Innovation in Kenyan Universities: The Mediating and Moderating Role of Intermediaries

Universities are increasingly expected to translate Human Capital Development (HCD) into Technological Innovation (TI), yet limited empirical evidence exists on the mechanisms through which this relationship operates. In particular, the role of intermediary structures in linking human capital and innovation remains insufficiently examined. This study investigates Innovation Intermediaries Development (IID) as both a mediating and moderating construct in the association between HCD and TI in Kenyan universities. A cross-sectional quantitative design based on perceptual data is adopted. Data from 284 respondents across Kenyan universities are analysed using covariance-based structural equation modelling (SEM) in IBM SPSS Amos. The study tests a consolidated model incorporating direct, mediating, and moderating associations among HCD, IID, and TI. The findings indicate that HCD is positively and significantly associated with TI (β = 0.181, p = 0.019) and IID (β = 0.570, p < 0.001), while IID is also positively associated with TI (β = 0.299, p < 0.001). In addition, IID significantly mediates the association between HCD and TI (β = 0.102, p = 0.001) and moderates the relationship (β = 0.265, p < 0.001), such that the association between HCD and TI is stronger at higher levels of IID. Institutional age is also positively associated with TI (β = 0.119, p = 0.001). The study concludes that intermediary development is associated with the relationship between HCD and technological innovation in universities. The findings suggest that universities and policymakers may complement investments in human capital with efforts to strengthen intermediary structures, such as innovation hubs and technology transfer offices, to support innovation-related activities.

Human Capital Development

1. Abuzyarova, D., Belousova, V., Krayushkina, Z., Lonshcikova, Y., Nikiforova, E., & Chichkanov, N. (2019). The role of human capital in science, technology and innovation. Форсайт, 13(2 (eng)), 107–119. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/the-role-of-human-capital-in-science-technology-and-innovation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahnert, T., Doerr, S., Pierri, M. N., & Timmer, M. Y. (2021). Does IT help? Information technology in banking and entrepreneurship. International Monetary Fund. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=SEZEEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=%22firm+age+and+size+are+correlated+%22&ots=qD6Pc3Sjmn&sig=ymsxlSd59IUnvnI8N0jgC4CSW0o [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alexandre, F., Costa, H., Faria, A. P., & Portela, M. (2022). Enhancing University–Industry collaboration: The role of intermediary organizations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(5), 1584–1611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09889-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Atinc, G., Simmering, M. J., & Kroll, M. J. (2012). Control Variable Use and Reporting in Macro and Micro Management Research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110397773 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Awode, S. S., & Oduola, M. O. (2025). The interplay between technological innovation and human capital development in driving industrial productivity and competitiveness in Africa. Journal of Economics and Development, 27(1), 56–71. https://www.emerald.com/jed/article/27/1/56/1239739 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Azzahra, K., & Sampurno, R. D. (2023). Analisis pengaruh current ratio, firm size, debt to asset, dan debt to equity terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan dengan firm age sebagai variabel kontrol (studi pada perusahaan sub sektor property dan real estate terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia periode 2017-2021). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 12(2). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/djom/article/view/38743 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bambi, P. D. R., & Pea-Assounga, J. B. B. (2025). Unraveling the interplay of research investment, educational attainment, human capital development, and economic advancement in technological innovation: A panel VAR approach. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 3309–3341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12938-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bäumle, P. (2025). Knowledge intermediaries in regional innovation systems. https://ediss.uni-goettingen.de/handle/11858/15721 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Becker, G. S. (1994). Human capital revisited. In Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education, third edition (pp. 15–28). The University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c11229/c11229.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Büyükkurt, Ö. F. (2024). Detection of the Relationship Between Firm Age and Discretionary Accrual Manipulation Practices: Evidence From BIST. ACADEMIC SOCIAL RESOURCES JOURNAL, 9(5), 423–429. https://asrjournal.org/files/asrjournal/85b4eec5-2b70-43da-a3fa-9de5c0ea19bb.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chen, Y., Chen, L., & Li, G. (2025). Human capital expansion and urban innovation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 85, 870–887. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624003680 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cooper, A. M. (2013). Research mediation in education: A typology of research brokering organizations that exist across Canada. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59(2), 181–207. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/ajer/article/view/55613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Curado, C., Oliveira, M., Schniederjans, D. G., & Teixeira, E. K. (2024). Control variable use and reporting in operations management: A systematic literature review and revisit. Management Review Quarterly, 74(3), 1809–1839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00348-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. David, P. A. (2000). Knowledge, capabilities and human capital formation in economic growth. New Zealand Treasury Working Paper. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/205454 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Enders, J., & Naidoo, R. (2019). Audit-market intermediaries: Doing institutional work in British research-intensive universities. Studies in Higher Education, 44(7), 1290–1301. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1436536 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Feser, D. (2023). Innovation intermediaries revised: A systematic literature review on innovation intermediaries’ role for knowledge sharing. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1827–1862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00593-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Frølund, L., & Ziethen, M. (2016). The wisdom of the intermediary: The role, function, and ways-of-being of the intermediary in a strategic program for university-industry relations. Triple Helix, 3(1), 1–21. https://brill.com/view/journals/thj/3/1/article-p1_9.xml [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gaskin, J. E., Lowry, P. B., Rosengren, W., & Fife, P. T. (2025). Essential Validation Criteria for Rigorous Covariance‐Based Structural Equation Modelling. Information Systems Journal, 35(6), 1630–1661. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12598 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hanafiah, M. H. (2020). Formative vs. reflective measurement model: Guidelines for structural equation modeling research. International Journal of Analysis and Applications, 18(5), 876–889. https://etamaths.com/index.php/ijaa/article/view/2166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hayter, C. S. (2016). A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: The role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 633–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9756-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Khajavi, S., & Dehghani, G. (2016). Board characteristics and managerial overconfidence in an emerging market. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(2), 529–537. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijefi/article/352479 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Knight, C., & Lyall, C. (2013). Knowledge brokers: The role of intermediaries in producing research impact. Evidence & Policy, 9(3), 309. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/evp/9/3/article-p309.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Koria, M., Osorno, R. H., Telalbasic, I., Ramírez Vázquez, D. D. C., & Chirchir, E. (2021). An innovation intermediary for Nairobi, Kenya: Designing student-centric services for university-industry collaboration. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 13(6), 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2020.1796012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kozhushko, R. (2021). Human capital as a key factor in the development of university innovation. Management, 33(1), 52–60. http://167.235.6.87:8459/index.php/mng/article/view/861 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kruger, S., & Steyn, A. A. (2020). Enhancing technology transfer through entrepreneurial development: Practices from innovation spaces. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(6), 1655–1689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09769-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kyambo, B. K., Njihia, J., & Muindi, F. (2021). Effect of Human Resource Management on Operational Efficiency of Universities in Kenya. https://www.academia.edu/download/86766887/475280166.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lin, H., Zeng, S., Liu, H., & Li, C. (2020). Bridging the gaps or fecklessness? A moderated mediating examination of intermediaries’ effects on corporate innovation. Technovation, 94, 102018. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497218301226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lio, S. (2021). Human Capital Accounting Implications on Firm Market Value: A Survey of Kenyan Private Universities. Accounting and Finance Research, 10(2), 51. https://www.researchgate.net/ profile/Sammy-Lio/publication/357933086_Human Capital Accounting Implications_on Firm_Market Value_A_Survey_of_Kenyan_Private_Universities/links/61e822755779d35951bcc09c/Human-Capital-Accounting-Implications-on-Firm-Market-Value-A-Survey-of-Kenyan-Private-Universities.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435912000681 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mohaghegh, Z., & Mosleh, A. (2009). Measurement techniques for organizational safety causal models: Characterization and suggestions for enhancements. Safety Science, 47(10), 1398–1409. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753509000769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Okebukola, P. A. (2014). Human capital development and innovation. InT. Abioye, C, Awonuga and A. Amuwo (Eds) Leadership &Innovation in Africa’s Development Paradigm. https://www. academia.edu/download/35364927/OKEBUKOLA-Human_Capital_Development_and_Innovation.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Pan, J.-X., & Fang, K.-T. (2002). Maximum Likelihood Estimation. In J.-X. Pan & K.-T. Fang, Growth Curve Models and Statistical Diagnostics (pp. 77–158). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21812-0_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Pasban, M., & Nojedeh, S. H. (2016). A Review of the Role of Human Capital in the Organization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 249–253. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042816311338 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zCAUDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Penrose,+E.+T.+(1959).+The+theory+of+the+growth+of+the+firm.+Oxford+University+Press.&ots=HnL9-v53hp&sig=u3_rKl-ad0FtiJXNjx1YJWZAv28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Plans, E.-P. B. (2005). Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics. https://conference.iza.org/conference_files/TAM2005/decressin_a2135.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Podra, O., Litvin, N., Zhyvko, Z., Kopytko, M., & Kukharska, L. (2020). Innovative development and human capital as determinants of knowledge economy. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 252–260. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=951063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Santos, T. N., Dias, J. G., & Mendonça, S. (2023). University–industry cooperation: A taxonomy of intermediaries. Science and Public Policy, 50(3), 457–490. https://academic.oup.com/spp/article-abstract/50/3/457/7043715 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of Market Research (pp. 587–632). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Saunders, M., & Tosey, P. (2012). Research design. Academia. https://www.academia.edu/download/32495174/Research_30_-_Research_Onion_Layers_58.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Supriadi, A., Permana, I., Afandi, D. R., Arisondha, E., & Kusumaningsih, A. (2025). The triple helix model: University-industry-government collaboration and its role in smes innovation and development. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1(9), 75–90. https://wikep.net/index.php/IJEFE/article/view/946 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Teslenko, V., Melnikov, R., & Bazin, D. (2021). Evaluation of the impact of human capital on innovation activity in Russian regions. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 8(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2021.1900744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Wendo, D. R., Amoth, D., & Bosire, E. (2025). Effectiveness of knowledge sharing practices among youth entrepreneurs engaged in small and Medium enterprise (SMEs) in Kenya. Information Development, 02666669251330874. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251330874 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37(8), 1205–1223. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733308000887 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Entrepreneurship and Start-Up Ecosystem Vis-À-Vis Government Start-Up Scheme in Manipur: A Critical Review and a Way Forward
• Building Resilience: How Malaysian Women Entrepreneurs Use Strengths and Resources to Navigate Challenges
• Branding in Digital Entrepreneurship: Evaluating Branding Criteria in IT Entrepreneurship
• Bridging the Intention–Action Gap through Entrepreneurial Optimism: A Conceptual Exploration
• Entrepreneurial Orientation of Undergraduate Students in University Malaysia Perlis: A Conceptual Paper