Bridging the Gap: Transition of Pupils Abled Differently from Mainstream Primary Schools to Junior Secondary Schools in Rachuonyo Sub-County, Kenya

This study examined the transition of pupils abled differently from mainstream public primary schools to junior secondary schools in Rachuonyo Sub-County, Homabay County, Kenya. The study aimed to establish the transition rate and identify challenges influencing the transition of these learners within the framework of inclusive education. A descriptive research design was adopted and conducted in 32 mainstream public primary and junior secondary schools within the sub-county. The target population comprised learners with physical impairments in Grades 6, 7, and 8, their teachers, headteachers, and the County Officer in charge of special needs education. Using purposive sampling, a total of 141 respondents were selected, including 57 learners with physical impairments, 53 teachers, 30 headteachers, and one county special needs education officer. Data were collected using student questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis of class registers. Instrument validity was ensured through expert review, while reliability was confirmed through a pilot study which produced a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.865. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequencies, means, and percentages. Findings indicated that the transition rate for pupils with physical impairments in the study area was lower than the national average of 99.8 percent (Ouma et al.,2024), with most respondents estimating it at around 70% and above, while others reported lower rates. Document analysis further revealed a decline in enrolment and promotion of pupils with physical impairments from Grade 6 to Grade 8. Major challenges identified were inadequate infrastructure, limited teaching and learning resources, lack of assistive technologies, shortage of trained special needs teachers, social stigma, inadequate health support, and limited parental involvement. The study concludes that despite progress in inclusive education, systemic and institutional barriers continue to hinder the effective transition of pupils with physical impairments to junior secondary schools.

Transition rate, Physical impairments, Inclusive education, mainstream public primary schools, educational accessibility

1. Amunga, J., Wawire, V., & Mwakubo, S. (2020). Factors influencing transition from primary to secondary schools in Kenya. International Journal of Educational Development, 74, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aute, J., Otieno, K., & Onyango, P. (2020). Transition challenges of learners with disabilities in secondary education in Homa-Bay County, Kenya. African Journal of Inclusive Education, 5(2), 44–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Buhere, P., & Ochieng, P. (2013). Inclusive education in Kenya: Challenges and prospects for learners with disabilities. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(18), 128–134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fute, A. (2019). Educational access and transition challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Policy Research, 6(3), 45–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Republic of Kenya(1964). Kenya Education Commission report (Ominde Report). Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Republic of Kenya(1965). Sessional Paper No. 10 of 1965 on African Socialism and its Application to Planning in Kenya. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Republic of Kenya(1988). Sessional Paper No. 6 of 1988 on Education and Manpower Training for the Next Decade and Beyond. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Republic of Kenya Sessional Paper No. 1 of 2005 on A Policy Framework for Education, Training and Research. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Republic of Kenya Education sector report. Ministry of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Huebler, F. (2016). Educational transition rates and participation in secondary education. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ministry of Education. (2008). Special needs education policy framework. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ministry of Education. (2009). National special needs education policy framework. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ministry of Education. (2012). Education sector policy for learners and trainees with disabilities. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ministry of Education. (2018). Kenya Certificate of Primary Education (KCPE) examination report. Kenya National Examinations Council. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. (2004). Development of education in Kenya. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ouma, I., Amimo, C., & Ojwang’, J. (2024). Education transition rates in Siaya County, Kenya. Journal of African Educational Research, 12(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rasheed, M. (2016). Retention and completion rates of learners with special needs in primary schools in Pakistan. International Journal of Special Education, 31(2), 87–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Republic of Kenya. (2001). Children’s Act. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Republic of Kenya. (2010). The Constitution of Kenya. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Trainor, A. A., Morningstar, M. E., & Murray, A. (2019). Transition planning and post-school outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(3), 131–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. United Nations. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals report. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2000). The Dakar framework for action: Education for all. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2008). Education for all global monitoring report. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2019). Global education monitoring report. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Waddington, L., & Lawson, A. (2018). The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and inclusive education policies. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study